Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | $230.43 | -4.27% | 12.1B | 20.95 | $11.43 | +5.10% |
| DAL | $79.19 | +0.52% | 52.2B | 11.61 | $6.85 | +0.95% |
| UAL | $105.17 | +0.03% | 34.1B | 9.39 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $57.02 | -0.23% | 29.7B | 11.97 | $4.76 | +1.73% |
| LUV | $41.39 | +1.26% | 20.2B | 27.54 | $1.50 | +1.74% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $48.32 | -2.80% | 14.5B | 8.60 | $5.78 | +3.09% |
| JOBY | $9.58 | -16.23% | 10.9B | -9.76 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| AAL | $13.36 | -1.55% | 8.8B | 42.90 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ASR | $284.90 | -4.00% | 8.8B | 15.58 | $18.79 | +7.25% |
Stock Comparison
PAC vs DAL Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while DAL trades at $79.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check DAL's competition here
PAC vs UAL Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while UAL trades at $105.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check UAL's competition here
PAC vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while RYAAY trades at $57.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check RYAAY's competition here
PAC vs LUV Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while LUV trades at $41.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check LUV's competition here
PAC vs CEA Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check CEA's competition here
PAC vs LTM Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while LTM trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check LTM's competition here
PAC vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while JOBY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check JOBY's competition here
PAC vs AAL Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while AAL trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AAL's competition here
PAC vs ASR Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ASR trades at $284.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ASR's competition here
PAC vs CPA Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while CPA trades at $133.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check CPA's competition here
PAC vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while OMAB trades at $97.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check OMAB's competition here
PAC vs ALK Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ALK trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 87.11. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ALK's competition here
PAC vs GOL Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check GOL's competition here
PAC vs CAAP Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while CAAP trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check CAAP's competition here
PAC vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SKYW trades at $84.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SKYW's competition here
PAC vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AAWW's competition here
PAC vs AERO Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while AERO trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AERO's competition here
PAC vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while PBI-PB trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check PBI-PB's competition here
PAC vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while JBLU trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check JBLU's competition here
PAC vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ALGT trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.99. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ALGT's competition here
PAC vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ATSG's competition here
PAC vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ULCC trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ULCC's competition here
PAC vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while JOBY-WT trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
PAC vs HA Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check HA's competition here
PAC vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 897M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while VLRS trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check VLRS's competition here
PAC vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SNCY's competition here
PAC vs RJET Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 829.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while RJET trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check RJET's competition here
PAC vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 541.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SRTA trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SRTA's competition here
PAC vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check BLDE's competition here
PAC vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ASLE trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ASLE's competition here
PAC vs UP Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while UP trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check UP's competition here
PAC vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check PACI-WT's competition here
PAC vs FLYX Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while FLYX trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check FLYX's competition here
PAC vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check AZUL's competition here
PAC vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SAVE's competition here
PAC vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SRFM trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SRFM's competition here
PAC vs MATH Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while MATH trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check MATH's competition here
PAC vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check FLYY's competition here
PAC vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check BLDEW's competition here
PAC vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
PAC vs MESA Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check MESA's competition here
PAC vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SOAR trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SOAR's competition here
PAC vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check SRTAW's competition here
PAC vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ZNH's competition here
PAC vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check ASLEW's competition here
PAC vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
PAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAC stands at 12.1B. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAC is priced at $230.43, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.95, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAC's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PAC is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAC.Check UP-WT's competition here