Spirit Airlines, Inc. (SAVE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SAVE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAVE | $1.08 | N/A | 118.3M | -0.17 | -$6.20 | +37.04% |
| DAL | $80.02 | -1.78% | 52.6B | 11.68 | $6.85 | +0.93% |
| UAL | $108.82 | -2.63% | 35.3B | 9.73 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $58.72 | -1.08% | 30.6B | 12.36 | $4.75 | +1.68% |
| LUV | $42.34 | -0.98% | 20.7B | 28.22 | $1.50 | +1.70% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $51.01 | -2.00% | 14.9B | 8.82 | $5.78 | +3.00% |
| PAC | $240.04 | +3.73% | 12.1B | 20.97 | $11.45 | +5.11% |
| JOBY | $11.87 | -0.84% | 11.7B | -10.41 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| AAL | $13.93 | -2.86% | 9.2B | 44.94 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SAVE vs DAL Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while DAL trades at $80.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check DAL's competition here
SAVE vs UAL Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while UAL trades at $108.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check UAL's competition here
SAVE vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while RYAAY trades at $58.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check RYAAY's competition here
SAVE vs LUV Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while LUV trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check LUV's competition here
SAVE vs CEA Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check CEA's competition here
SAVE vs LTM Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while LTM trades at $51.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check LTM's competition here
SAVE vs PAC Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while PAC trades at $240.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check PAC's competition here
SAVE vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while JOBY trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check JOBY's competition here
SAVE vs AAL Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AAL trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AAL's competition here
SAVE vs ASR Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ASR trades at $303.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ASR's competition here
SAVE vs CPA Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while CPA trades at $136.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check CPA's competition here
SAVE vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while OMAB trades at $103.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check OMAB's competition here
SAVE vs ALK Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ALK trades at $43.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 89.59. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ALK's competition here
SAVE vs CAAP Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while CAAP trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check CAAP's competition here
SAVE vs GOL Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check GOL's competition here
SAVE vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SKYW trades at $81.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SKYW's competition here
SAVE vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AAWW's competition here
SAVE vs AERO Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AERO trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AERO's competition here
SAVE vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while PBI-PB trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check PBI-PB's competition here
SAVE vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while JBLU trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check JBLU's competition here
SAVE vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
SAVE vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ALGT trades at $87.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -45.66. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ALGT's competition here
SAVE vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE and ATSG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATSG's competition here
SAVE vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ULCC trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ULCC's competition here
SAVE vs HA Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check HA's competition here
SAVE vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 898.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while VLRS trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check VLRS's competition here
SAVE vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE and SNCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNCY's competition here
SAVE vs RJET Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 870.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while RJET trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check RJET's competition here
SAVE vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 541.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SRTA trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SRTA's competition here
SAVE vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check BLDE's competition here
SAVE vs UP Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while UP trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check UP's competition here
SAVE vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ASLE trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ASLE's competition here
SAVE vs FLYX Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while FLYX trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check FLYX's competition here
SAVE vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check PACI-WT's competition here
SAVE vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check AZUL's competition here
SAVE vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SRFM trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SRFM's competition here
SAVE vs MATH Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while MATH trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check MATH's competition here
SAVE vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check FLYY's competition here
SAVE vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check BLDEW's competition here
SAVE vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
SAVE vs MESA Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check MESA's competition here
SAVE vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SOAR trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SOAR's competition here
SAVE vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check SRTAW's competition here
SAVE vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check UP-WT's competition here
SAVE vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ASLEW's competition here
SAVE vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
SAVE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAVE stands at 118.3M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAVE is priced at $1.08, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAVE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAVE's ROE is +15.24%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SAVE is less volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAVE.Check ZNH's competition here