SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while DAL trades at $81.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check DAL's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while UAL trades at $111.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check UAL's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while RYAAY trades at $59.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check RYAAY's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while LUV trades at $42.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check LUV's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while CEA trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check CEA's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while LTM trades at $52.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check LTM's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while JOBY trades at $11.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check JOBY's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while PAC trades at $231.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check PAC's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while AAL trades at $14.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 46.26. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check AAL's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ASR trades at $296.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ASR's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while CPA trades at $140.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check CPA's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ALK trades at $44.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 90.86. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ALK's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while OMAB trades at $100.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check OMAB's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while CAAP trades at $26.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check CAAP's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while GOL trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check GOL's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while AAWW trades at $102.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check AAWW's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while AERO trades at $16.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.75. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check AERO's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while PBI-PB trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check PBI-PB's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while JBLU trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check JBLU's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check JOBY-WT's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ALGT trades at $89.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -46.44. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ALGT's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ATSG trades at $22.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ATSG's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ULCC trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ULCC's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while HA trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check HA's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 879.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while VLRS trades at $7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check VLRS's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while SNCY trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check SNCY's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 856.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while RJET trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check RJET's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 529.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while SRTA trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -32.21. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check SRTA's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while BLDE trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check BLDE's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 358.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while UP trades at $9.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check UP's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 308.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ASLE trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ASLE's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 213.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while FLYX trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check FLYX's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check PACI-WT's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while AZUL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZUL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check AZUL's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while SAVE trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check SAVE's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while SRFM trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check SRFM's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while MATH trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check MATH's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while FLYY trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check FLYY's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check BLDEW's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check FLYX-WT's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while MESA trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check MESA's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while SOAR trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check SOAR's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check SRTAW's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ZNH trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ZNH's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check UP-WT's competition here

SKYW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKYW stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKYW is priced at $81.90, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKYW currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, SKYW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYW is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYW.Check ASLEW's competition here