Surf Air Mobility Inc. (SRFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRFM | $1.10 | -5.17% | 110.9M | -0.48 | -$2.32 | N/A |
| DAL | $79.42 | -0.11% | 52.2B | 11.59 | $6.85 | +0.95% |
| UAL | $105.73 | +0.75% | 34.3B | 9.46 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $56.98 | +0.02% | 29.7B | 11.97 | $4.76 | +1.74% |
| LUV | $41.54 | +0.56% | 20.3B | 27.69 | $1.50 | +1.74% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $48.32 | -2.80% | 14.2B | 8.38 | $5.78 | +3.17% |
| PAC | $228.80 | -4.52% | 11.5B | 19.99 | $11.43 | +5.31% |
| JOBY | $9.55 | -14.27% | 9.4B | -8.38 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| AAL | $13.50 | +1.50% | 8.9B | 43.55 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRFM vs DAL Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while DAL trades at $79.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check DAL's competition here
SRFM vs UAL Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while UAL trades at $105.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check UAL's competition here
SRFM vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while RYAAY trades at $56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check RYAAY's competition here
SRFM vs LUV Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while LUV trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check LUV's competition here
SRFM vs CEA Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check CEA's competition here
SRFM vs LTM Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while LTM trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check LTM's competition here
SRFM vs PAC Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while PAC trades at $228.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check PAC's competition here
SRFM vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while JOBY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check JOBY's competition here
SRFM vs AAL Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while AAL trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check AAL's competition here
SRFM vs ASR Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ASR trades at $282.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ASR's competition here
SRFM vs CPA Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while CPA trades at $133.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check CPA's competition here
SRFM vs ALK Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ALK trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 87.39. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ALK's competition here
SRFM vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while OMAB trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check OMAB's competition here
SRFM vs GOL Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check GOL's competition here
SRFM vs CAAP Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while CAAP trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check CAAP's competition here
SRFM vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while SKYW trades at $84.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check SKYW's competition here
SRFM vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check AAWW's competition here
SRFM vs AERO Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while AERO trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check AERO's competition here
SRFM vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while PBI-PB trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check PBI-PB's competition here
SRFM vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while JBLU trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check JBLU's competition here
SRFM vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ALGT trades at $84.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.81. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ALGT's competition here
SRFM vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ATSG's competition here
SRFM vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ULCC trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ULCC's competition here
SRFM vs HA Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check HA's competition here
SRFM vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check SNCY's competition here
SRFM vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 844.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while VLRS trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check VLRS's competition here
SRFM vs RJET Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 826.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while RJET trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check RJET's competition here
SRFM vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 696.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while JOBY-WT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
SRFM vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 501M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while SRTA trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -30.47. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check SRTA's competition here
SRFM vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check BLDE's competition here
SRFM vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ASLE trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ASLE's competition here
SRFM vs UP Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while UP trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check UP's competition here
SRFM vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check PACI-WT's competition here
SRFM vs FLYX Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while FLYX trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check FLYX's competition here
SRFM vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check AZUL's competition here
SRFM vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check SAVE's competition here
SRFM vs MATH Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while MATH trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check MATH's competition here
SRFM vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check FLYY's competition here
SRFM vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check BLDEW's competition here
SRFM vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
SRFM vs MESA Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check MESA's competition here
SRFM vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while SOAR trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check SOAR's competition here
SRFM vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check SRTAW's competition here
SRFM vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ASLEW's competition here
SRFM vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check UP-WT's competition here
SRFM vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
SRFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRFM stands at 110.9M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRFM is priced at $1.10, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.48, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRFM's ROE is +1.41%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRFM is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRFM.Check ZNH's competition here