flyExclusive, Inc. (FLYX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLYX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYX | $2.46 | -5.02% | 200.5M | -2.82 | -$0.88 | N/A |
| DAL | $78.78 | -1.55% | 51.8B | 11.50 | $6.85 | +0.95% |
| UAL | $105.14 | -3.38% | 34.1B | 9.40 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $57.15 | -2.67% | 29.8B | 12.03 | $4.75 | +1.73% |
| LUV | $40.87 | -3.47% | 20B | 27.25 | $1.50 | +1.75% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $49.71 | -2.55% | 14.6B | 8.60 | $5.78 | +3.08% |
| PAC | $240.72 | +0.28% | 12.2B | 21.03 | $11.45 | +5.03% |
| JOBY | $11.43 | -3.71% | 11.2B | -10.03 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| AAL | $13.57 | -2.58% | 9B | 43.77 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLYX vs DAL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while DAL trades at $78.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check DAL's competition here
FLYX vs UAL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while UAL trades at $105.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check UAL's competition here
FLYX vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while RYAAY trades at $57.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check RYAAY's competition here
FLYX vs LUV Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while LUV trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check LUV's competition here
FLYX vs CEA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check CEA's competition here
FLYX vs LTM Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while LTM trades at $49.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check LTM's competition here
FLYX vs PAC Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while PAC trades at $240.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check PAC's competition here
FLYX vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while JOBY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check JOBY's competition here
FLYX vs AAL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while AAL trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 43.77. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AAL's competition here
FLYX vs ASR Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ASR trades at $296.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ASR's competition here
FLYX vs CPA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while CPA trades at $135.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check CPA's competition here
FLYX vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while OMAB trades at $101.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check OMAB's competition here
FLYX vs ALK Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ALK trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 85.45. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ALK's competition here
FLYX vs GOL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check GOL's competition here
FLYX vs CAAP Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while CAAP trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check CAAP's competition here
FLYX vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SKYW trades at $81.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SKYW's competition here
FLYX vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AAWW's competition here
FLYX vs AERO Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while AERO trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AERO's competition here
FLYX vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while PBI-PB trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check PBI-PB's competition here
FLYX vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while JBLU trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check JBLU's competition here
FLYX vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ALGT trades at $82.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.22. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ALGT's competition here
FLYX vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ATSG's competition here
FLYX vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
FLYX vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ULCC trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ULCC's competition here
FLYX vs HA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check HA's competition here
FLYX vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 910.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while VLRS trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check VLRS's competition here
FLYX vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SNCY's competition here
FLYX vs RJET Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 826.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while RJET trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check RJET's competition here
FLYX vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 537.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SRTA trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -32.68. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SRTA's competition here
FLYX vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check BLDE's competition here
FLYX vs UP Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 315.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while UP trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check UP's competition here
FLYX vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ASLE trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ASLE's competition here
FLYX vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check PACI-WT's competition here
FLYX vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AZUL's competition here
FLYX vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SAVE's competition here
FLYX vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SRFM trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SRFM's competition here
FLYX vs MATH Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while MATH trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check MATH's competition here
FLYX vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check FLYY's competition here
FLYX vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check BLDEW's competition here
FLYX vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
FLYX vs MESA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check MESA's competition here
FLYX vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SOAR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SOAR's competition here
FLYX vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SRTAW's competition here
FLYX vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ASLEW's competition here
FLYX vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ZNH's competition here
FLYX vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 200.5M. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.46, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.82, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check UP-WT's competition here