Corporación América Airports S.A. (CAAP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAAP | $25.35 | -2.31% | 4.1B | 14.60 | $1.74 | N/A |
| DAL | $79.42 | -0.11% | 52.2B | 11.59 | $6.85 | +0.95% |
| UAL | $105.73 | +0.75% | 34.3B | 9.46 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $56.98 | +0.02% | 29.7B | 11.97 | $4.76 | +1.74% |
| LUV | $41.54 | +0.56% | 20.3B | 27.69 | $1.50 | +1.74% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $48.32 | -2.80% | 14.2B | 8.38 | $5.78 | +3.17% |
| PAC | $228.80 | -4.52% | 11.5B | 19.99 | $11.43 | +5.31% |
| JOBY | $9.55 | -14.27% | 9.4B | -8.38 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| AAL | $13.50 | +1.50% | 8.9B | 43.55 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CAAP vs DAL Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while DAL trades at $79.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check DAL's competition here
CAAP vs UAL Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while UAL trades at $105.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check UAL's competition here
CAAP vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while RYAAY trades at $56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check RYAAY's competition here
CAAP vs LUV Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while LUV trades at $41.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check LUV's competition here
CAAP vs CEA Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check CEA's competition here
CAAP vs LTM Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while LTM trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check LTM's competition here
CAAP vs PAC Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while PAC trades at $228.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check PAC's competition here
CAAP vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while JOBY trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check JOBY's competition here
CAAP vs AAL Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while AAL trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check AAL's competition here
CAAP vs ASR Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ASR trades at $282.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ASR's competition here
CAAP vs CPA Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while CPA trades at $133.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check CPA's competition here
CAAP vs ALK Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ALK trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 87.39. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ALK's competition here
CAAP vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while OMAB trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check OMAB's competition here
CAAP vs GOL Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check GOL's competition here
CAAP vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SKYW trades at $84.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SKYW's competition here
CAAP vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check AAWW's competition here
CAAP vs AERO Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while AERO trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check AERO's competition here
CAAP vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while PBI-PB trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check PBI-PB's competition here
CAAP vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while JBLU trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check JBLU's competition here
CAAP vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ALGT trades at $84.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.81. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ALGT's competition here
CAAP vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ATSG's competition here
CAAP vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ULCC trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ULCC's competition here
CAAP vs HA Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check HA's competition here
CAAP vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SNCY's competition here
CAAP vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 844.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while VLRS trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check VLRS's competition here
CAAP vs RJET Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 826.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while RJET trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check RJET's competition here
CAAP vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 696.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while JOBY-WT trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
CAAP vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 501M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SRTA trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -30.47. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SRTA's competition here
CAAP vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check BLDE's competition here
CAAP vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ASLE trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ASLE's competition here
CAAP vs UP Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 261.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while UP trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check UP's competition here
CAAP vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check PACI-WT's competition here
CAAP vs FLYX Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while FLYX trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check FLYX's competition here
CAAP vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check AZUL's competition here
CAAP vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SAVE's competition here
CAAP vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SRFM trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SRFM's competition here
CAAP vs MATH Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while MATH trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check MATH's competition here
CAAP vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check FLYY's competition here
CAAP vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check BLDEW's competition here
CAAP vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
CAAP vs MESA Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check MESA's competition here
CAAP vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SOAR trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SOAR's competition here
CAAP vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check SRTAW's competition here
CAAP vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ASLEW's competition here
CAAP vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is less volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check UP-WT's competition here
CAAP vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
CAAP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAP stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAP is priced at $25.35, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.60, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAP's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAP is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAP.Check ZNH's competition here