Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (MATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATH | $0.87 | -15.53% | 38.6M | 4.94 | $0.18 | N/A |
| DAL | $79.51 | +0.93% | 52.2B | 11.61 | $6.85 | +0.95% |
| UAL | $104.94 | -0.19% | 34.1B | 9.39 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $56.97 | -0.31% | 29.7B | 11.97 | $4.76 | +1.73% |
| LUV | $41.31 | +1.08% | 20.2B | 27.54 | $1.50 | +1.74% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $49.71 | +0.00% | 14.5B | 8.60 | $5.78 | +3.09% |
| PAC | $239.64 | -0.45% | 12.1B | 20.95 | $11.43 | +5.10% |
| JOBY | $11.14 | -2.54% | 10.9B | -9.76 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| AAL | $13.30 | -1.99% | 8.8B | 42.90 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MATH vs DAL Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while DAL trades at $79.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check DAL's competition here
MATH vs UAL Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while UAL trades at $104.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check UAL's competition here
MATH vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while RYAAY trades at $56.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check RYAAY's competition here
MATH vs LUV Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while LUV trades at $41.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LUV's competition here
MATH vs CEA Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CEA's competition here
MATH vs LTM Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while LTM trades at $49.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check LTM's competition here
MATH vs PAC Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while PAC trades at $239.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PAC's competition here
MATH vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while JOBY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JOBY's competition here
MATH vs AAL Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while AAL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AAL's competition here
MATH vs ASR Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ASR trades at $292.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ASR's competition here
MATH vs CPA Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while CPA trades at $133.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CPA's competition here
MATH vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while OMAB trades at $99.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check OMAB's competition here
MATH vs ALK Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ALK trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 87.11. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ALK's competition here
MATH vs GOL Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check GOL's competition here
MATH vs CAAP Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while CAAP trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check CAAP's competition here
MATH vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SKYW trades at $83.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SKYW's competition here
MATH vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AAWW's competition here
MATH vs AERO Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while AERO trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AERO's competition here
MATH vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while PBI-PB trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PBI-PB's competition here
MATH vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while JBLU trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JBLU's competition here
MATH vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ALGT trades at $84.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -43.99. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ALGT's competition here
MATH vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ATSG's competition here
MATH vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ULCC trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ULCC's competition here
MATH vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while JOBY-WT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
MATH vs HA Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check HA's competition here
MATH vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 897M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while VLRS trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check VLRS's competition here
MATH vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SNCY's competition here
MATH vs RJET Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 829.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while RJET trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check RJET's competition here
MATH vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 541.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SRTA trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -32.95. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SRTA's competition here
MATH vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BLDE's competition here
MATH vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ASLE trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ASLE's competition here
MATH vs UP Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while UP trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check UP's competition here
MATH vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check PACI-WT's competition here
MATH vs FLYX Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, FLYX has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while FLYX trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas FLYX's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FLYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLYX's competition here
MATH vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check AZUL's competition here
MATH vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SAVE's competition here
MATH vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SRFM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SRFM's competition here
MATH vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLYY's competition here
MATH vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check BLDEW's competition here
MATH vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
MATH vs MESA Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check MESA's competition here
MATH vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SOAR trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SOAR's competition here
MATH vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check SRTAW's competition here
MATH vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ASLEW's competition here
MATH vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check ZNH's competition here
MATH vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
MATH plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MATH stands at 38.6M. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MATH is priced at $0.87, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MATH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.94, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MATH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MATH is more volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MATH.Check UP-WT's competition here