TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See WULF's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for WULF and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | $15.74 | -3.38% | 7.8B | -3.61 | -$4.36 | N/A |
| GS-PC | $19.61 | +0.26% | 337.4B | 0.30 | $65.55 | +1.93% |
| MS-PE | $25.42 | -0.02% | 332.8B | 2.04 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
| MS-PF | $25.16 | -0.16% | 331.4B | 2.02 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
| MS-PQ | $24.88 | -0.28% | 325.9B | 1.99 | $12.50 | +2.11% |
| MS-PP | $24.51 | -0.73% | 324.9B | 1.97 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
| MS-PI | $23.55 | -0.72% | 315.5B | 1.89 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
| MS-PL | $18.34 | +0.16% | 315.3B | 1.47 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
| MS-PO | $15.70 | -0.76% | 314.2B | 1.26 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
| MS-PK | $21.65 | -0.18% | 311.8B | 1.74 | $12.47 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PFD 1/1000 C (NYSE: GS-PC)
WULF vs GS-PC Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 337.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PC trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PC's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PE)
WULF vs MS-PE Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 332.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PE trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PE's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PF)
WULF vs MS-PF Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PF trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PF's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PQ)
WULF vs MS-PQ Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 325.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PQ trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PQ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PP)
WULF vs MS-PP Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PP trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PP's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PI)
WULF vs MS-PI Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 315.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PI trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PI's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PL)
WULF vs MS-PL Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 315.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PL trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PL's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PO)
WULF vs MS-PO Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 314.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PO trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PO's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PK)
WULF vs MS-PK Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 311.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PK trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PK's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)
WULF vs MS Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 309.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS trades at $196.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS)
WULF vs GS Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 272.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GS trades at $935.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PD)
WULF vs GS-PD Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PD trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PA)
WULF vs GS-PA Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 197.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PA trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PA's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW)
WULF vs SCHW Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 172.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW trades at $99.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCHW's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PJ)
WULF vs SCHW-PJ Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PJ trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
The Charles Schwab Corporation (NYSE: SCHW-PD)
WULF vs SCHW-PD Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SCHW-PD trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD)
WULF vs HOOD Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while HOOD trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 52.60. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HOOD's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PJ)
WULF vs GS-PJ Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PJ's competition here
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS-PA)
WULF vs MS-PA Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MS-PA trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PA's competition here
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS-PK)
WULF vs GS-PK Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PK's competition here
Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: NMR)
WULF vs NMR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while NMR trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NMR's competition here
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LPLA)
WULF vs LPLA Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while LPLA trades at $314.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LPLA's competition here
Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL)
WULF vs CRCL Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CRCL trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is 60.92. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CRCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CRCL's competition here
Tradeweb Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: TW)
WULF vs TW Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while TW trades at $101.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TW's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNR)
WULF vs BMNR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BMNR trades at $27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BMNR's competition here
Futu Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FUTU)
WULF vs FUTU Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while FUTU trades at $111.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FUTU's competition here
Virtu Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VIRT)
WULF vs VIRT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while VIRT trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check VIRT's competition here
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: BMNP)
WULF vs BMNP Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BMNP has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BMNP trades at $99.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BMNP's P/E ratio is 1168.24. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BMNP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BMNP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BMNP's competition here
Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ: HUT)
WULF vs HUT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while HUT trades at $96.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HUT's competition here
XP Inc. (NASDAQ: XP)
WULF vs XP Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while XP trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check XP's competition here
Evercore Inc. (NYSE: EVR)
WULF vs EVR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while EVR trades at $262.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check EVR's competition here
Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (NYSE: JEF)
WULF vs JEF Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while JEF trades at $47.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check JEF's competition here
SCE Trust IV (NYSE: SCE-PJ)
WULF vs SCE-PJ Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
WULF vs RIOT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check RIOT's competition here
Galaxy Digital (NASDAQ: GLXY)
WULF vs GLXY Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GLXY trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -44.89. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GLXY's competition here
StoneX Group Inc. (NASDAQ: SNEX)
WULF vs SNEX Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SNEX trades at $66.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SNEX's competition here
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FIGR)
WULF vs FIGR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while FIGR trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FIGR's competition here
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX)
WULF vs MKTX Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MKTX trades at $164.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MKTX's competition here
BGC Group, Inc (NASDAQ: BGC)
WULF vs BGC Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BGC trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BGC's competition here
Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE: RJF-PA)
WULF vs RJF-PA Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check RJF-PA's competition here
Marex Group Limited (NASDAQ: MRX)
WULF vs MRX Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MRX trades at $71.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MRX's competition here
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MARA)
WULF vs MARA Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MARA trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MARA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MARA's competition here
Moelis & Company (NYSE: MC)
WULF vs MC Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MC trades at $58.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MC's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSK)
WULF vs CLSK Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CLSK trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CLSK's competition here
Lazard Inc (NYSE: LAZ)
WULF vs LAZ Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while LAZ trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LAZ's competition here
Miami International Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: MIAX)
WULF vs MIAX Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MIAX trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MIAX's competition here
CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLSKW)
WULF vs CLSKW Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CLSKW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CLSKW's competition here
eToro Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETOR)
WULF vs ETOR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while ETOR trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ETOR's competition here
Sharplink, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBET)
WULF vs SBET Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SBET trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SBET's competition here
BGC Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: BGCP)
WULF vs BGCP Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BGCP's competition here
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc Common Stock (NASDAQ: PURR)
WULF vs PURR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while PURR trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to PURR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PURR's competition here
Cipher Mining Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFRW)
WULF vs CIFRW Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CIFRW's competition here
AMTD International Inc. (NYSE: HKIB)
WULF vs HKIB Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HKIB's competition here
Perella Weinberg Partners (NASDAQ: PWP)
WULF vs PWP Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while PWP trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PWP's competition here
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (NYSE: OPY)
WULF vs OPY Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while OPY trades at $119.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check OPY's competition here
Gold.com, Inc. (NYSE: GOLD)
WULF vs GOLD Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GOLD trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GOLD's competition here
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMRK)
WULF vs AMRK Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AMRK's competition here
Cowen Inc. (NASDAQ: COWN)
WULF vs COWN Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check COWN's competition here
UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (NASDAQ: TIGR)
WULF vs TIGR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 829.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while TIGR trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TIGR's competition here
Lincoln International Inc. (NYSE: LCLN)
WULF vs LCLN Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 810.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while LCLN trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to LCLN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LCLN's competition here
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BTGO)
WULF vs BTGO Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 801.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BTGO trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BTGO's competition here
CoinShares PLC Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CSHR)
WULF vs CSHR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 728.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CSHR trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CSHR's competition here
Gemini Space Station, Inc. (NASDAQ: GEMI)
WULF vs GEMI Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 676.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GEMI trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GEMI's competition here
American Bitcoin Corp (NASDAQ: ABTC)
WULF vs ABTC Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 663.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while ABTC trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ABTC's competition here
Associated Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: AC)
WULF vs AC Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AC's competition here
Bit Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: BTBT)
WULF vs BTBT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 614.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BTBT trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BTBT's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
WULF vs CD Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 423.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CD's competition here
Mercurity Fintech Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: MFH)
WULF vs MFH Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MFH's competition here
ProCap Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRR)
WULF vs BRR Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BRR trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BRR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BRR's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFUW)
WULF vs FUFUW Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 327.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while FUFUW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FUFUW's competition here
Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE: GHL)
WULF vs GHL Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GHL's competition here
BitFuFu Inc. (NASDAQ: FUFU)
WULF vs FUFU Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while FUFU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FUFU's competition here
Coincheck Group N.V. (NASDAQ: CNCK)
WULF vs CNCK Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CNCK has a market cap of 216.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CNCK trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CNCK's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CNCK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CNCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CNCK's competition here
DeFi Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT)
WULF vs DEFT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while DEFT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DEFT's competition here
Nakamoto Inc. (NASDAQ: NAKA)
WULF vs NAKA Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 173.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while NAKA trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NAKA's competition here
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: SWIN)
WULF vs SWIN Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SWIN's competition here
MMTec, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTC)
WULF vs MTC Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MTC trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MTC's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MTC's competition here
Bluemount Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: BMHL)
WULF vs BMHL Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BMHL has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BMHL trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BMHL's P/E ratio is 100.39. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BMHL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BMHL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BMHL's competition here
Waton Financial Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: WTF)
WULF vs WTF Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WTF has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while WTF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas WTF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to WTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to WTF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check WTF's competition here
TOP Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: TOP)
WULF vs TOP Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while TOP trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -100.13. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TOP's competition here
Siebert Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: SIEB)
WULF vs SIEB Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SIEB trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -70.97. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SIEB's competition here
Top KingWin Ltd (NASDAQ: TCJH)
WULF vs TCJH Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TCJH's competition here
Scully Royalty Ltd. (NYSE: SRL)
WULF vs SRL Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 84.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SRL trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -39.57. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SRL's competition here
BTCS Inc. (NASDAQ: BTCS)
WULF vs BTCS Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while BTCS trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BTCS's competition here
Cango Inc. (NYSE: CANG)
WULF vs CANG Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while CANG trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to CANG's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CANG's competition here
GRIID Infrastructure Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: GRDI)
WULF vs GRDI Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRDI's competition here
The9 Limited (NASDAQ: NCTY)
WULF vs NCTY Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while NCTY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to NCTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NCTY's competition here
Dominari Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DOMH)
WULF vs DOMH Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while DOMH trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DOMH's competition here
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GREE)
WULF vs GREE Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GREE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GREE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GREE's competition here
Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp. R (NYSE: ADEX-WT)
WULF vs ADEX-WT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
Heritage Global Inc. (NASDAQ: HGBL)
WULF vs HGBL Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while HGBL trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to HGBL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HGBL's competition here
Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDIG)
WULF vs SDIG Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SDIG's competition here
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited (NASDAQ: MATH)
WULF vs MATH Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MATH trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MATH's competition here
Plutus Financial Group Limited (NASDAQ: PLUT)
WULF vs PLUT Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while PLUT trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PLUT's competition here
Cohen & Company Inc. (AMEX: COHN)
WULF vs COHN Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while COHN trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check COHN's competition here
Grande Group Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GRAN)
WULF vs GRAN Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GRAN has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while GRAN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas GRAN's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to GRAN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GRAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRAN's competition here
AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (AMEX: ATCH)
WULF vs ATCH Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ATCH has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while ATCH trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas ATCH's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to ATCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to ATCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ATCH's competition here
Fold Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLD)
WULF vs FLD Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FLD has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while FLD trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas FLD's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to FLD's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FLD's competition here
MDB Capital Holdings, LLC Class A common (NASDAQ: MDBH)
WULF vs MDBH Comparison September 2026
TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $15.74 on the NASDAQ, while MDBH trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.61, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -17.09%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MDBH's competition here