Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HOOD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOOD | $90.73 | -3.79% | 81.7B | 44.04 | $2.06 | N/A |
| MS | $211.01 | +1.45% | 332.9B | 19.11 | $11.04 | +1.91% |
| GS | $1,048.58 | +2.24% | 309.3B | 19.15 | $54.76 | +1.65% |
| GS-PD | $19.52 | +0.41% | 207.6B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.65% |
| GS-PA | $19.77 | +0.36% | 203.7B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.65% |
| SCHW | $88.74 | +1.59% | 154.3B | 17.64 | $5.03 | +1.34% |
| MS-PA | $19.67 | -0.05% | 69.4B | 2.51 | $7.86 | +1.91% |
| GS-PJ | $25.20 | -0.03% | 68.9B | 0.49 | $51.53 | +1.65% |
| MS-PI | $25.15 | +0.20% | 67B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +1.91% |
| MS-PF | $25.31 | +0.04% | 65.5B | 3.22 | $7.86 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
HOOD vs MS Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 332.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS trades at $211.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS's competition here
HOOD vs GS Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 309.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GS trades at $1,048.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GS's competition here
HOOD vs GS-PD Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 207.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GS-PD trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GS-PD's competition here
HOOD vs GS-PA Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GS-PA trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GS-PA's competition here
HOOD vs SCHW Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 154.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SCHW trades at $88.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SCHW's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PA Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PA trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PA's competition here
HOOD vs GS-PJ Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GS-PJ's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PI Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PI's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PF Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PF's competition here
HOOD vs GS-PK Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GS-PK's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PE Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PE trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PE's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PK Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PK trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PK's competition here
HOOD vs SCHW-PD Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PQ Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PQ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PQ's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PP Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PP trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PP's competition here
HOOD vs SCHW-PJ Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SCHW-PJ trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PL Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PL trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PL's competition here
HOOD vs RJF Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while RJF trades at $145.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check RJF's competition here
HOOD vs CRCL Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while CRCL trades at $104.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -455.70. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check CRCL's competition here
HOOD vs MS-PO Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MS-PO trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MS-PO's competition here
HOOD vs NMR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while NMR trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check NMR's competition here
HOOD vs IREN Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while IREN trades at $65.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 84.84. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check IREN's competition here
HOOD vs LPLA Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while LPLA trades at $275.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check LPLA's competition here
HOOD vs TW Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while TW trades at $100.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check TW's competition here
HOOD vs STRD Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while STRD trades at $70.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check STRD's competition here
HOOD vs HUT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while HUT trades at $132.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -46.94. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check HUT's competition here
HOOD vs FUTU Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while FUTU trades at $102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check FUTU's competition here
HOOD vs EVR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while EVR trades at $346.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check EVR's competition here
HOOD vs WULF Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while WULF trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check WULF's competition here
HOOD vs VIRT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while VIRT trades at $51.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check VIRT's competition here
HOOD vs JEF Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while JEF trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check JEF's competition here
HOOD vs RIOT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while RIOT trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check RIOT's competition here
HOOD vs SF Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SF trades at $69.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SF's competition here
HOOD vs GLXY Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GLXY trades at $30.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -128.37. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GLXY's competition here
HOOD vs BMNR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BMNR trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check BMNR's competition here
HOOD vs CIFR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while CIFR trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check CIFR's competition here
HOOD vs HLI Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while HLI trades at $140.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check HLI's competition here
HOOD vs SCE-PJ Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
HOOD vs FRHC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while FRHC trades at $150.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 15047.00. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check FRHC's competition here
HOOD vs SNEX Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SNEX trades at $115.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SNEX's competition here
HOOD vs XP Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while XP trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check XP's competition here
HOOD vs GS-PC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GS-PC trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GS-PC's competition here
HOOD vs GSIW Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GSIW trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GSIW's competition here
HOOD vs FIGR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while FIGR trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check FIGR's competition here
HOOD vs MARA Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MARA trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MARA's competition here
HOOD vs PIPR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while PIPR trades at $77.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check PIPR's competition here
HOOD vs RJF-PA Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check RJF-PA's competition here
HOOD vs MC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MC trades at $69.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MC's competition here
HOOD vs NAKA Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while NAKA trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check NAKA's competition here
HOOD vs BGC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BGC trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check BGC's competition here
HOOD vs LAZ Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while LAZ trades at $48.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check LAZ's competition here
HOOD vs MKTX Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MKTX trades at $129.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MKTX's competition here
HOOD vs MIAX Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MIAX trades at $46.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MIAX's competition here
HOOD vs PJT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while PJT trades at $156.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check PJT's competition here
HOOD vs MRX Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MRX trades at $53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MRX's competition here
HOOD vs SF-PB Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SF-PB trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SF-PB's competition here
HOOD vs ETOR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while ETOR trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check ETOR's competition here
HOOD vs SF-PC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SF-PC trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SF-PC's competition here
HOOD vs BGCP Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check BGCP's competition here
HOOD vs SF-PD Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SF-PD trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SF-PD's competition here
HOOD vs CIFRW Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check CIFRW's competition here
HOOD vs PWP Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while PWP trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 66.76. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check PWP's competition here
HOOD vs HKIB Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check HKIB's competition here
HOOD vs BITF Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD and BITF have similar daily volatility (7.69).Check BITF's competition here
HOOD vs SBET Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SBET trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SBET's competition here
HOOD vs ABTC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while ABTC trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check ABTC's competition here
HOOD vs AMRK Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check AMRK's competition here
HOOD vs GOLD Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GOLD trades at $39.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GOLD's competition here
HOOD vs COWN Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check COWN's competition here
HOOD vs DFIN Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while DFIN trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check DFIN's competition here
HOOD vs OPY Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while OPY trades at $95.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check OPY's competition here
HOOD vs TIGR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 923M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while TIGR trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check TIGR's competition here
HOOD vs LCLN Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 772.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while LCLN trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LCLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check LCLN's competition here
HOOD vs BTBT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 736.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BTBT trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check BTBT's competition here
HOOD vs AC Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check AC's competition here
HOOD vs GEMI Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 630.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GEMI trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GEMI's competition here
HOOD vs RJF-PB Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while RJF-PB trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check RJF-PB's competition here
HOOD vs MFH Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MFH's competition here
HOOD vs FUFU Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 341.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while FUFU trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check FUFU's competition here
HOOD vs CSHR Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while CSHR trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check CSHR's competition here
HOOD vs GHL Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GHL's competition here
HOOD vs BTGO Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BTGO trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check BTGO's competition here
HOOD vs DEFT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while DEFT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check DEFT's competition here
HOOD vs SWIN Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SWIN's competition here
HOOD vs WHG Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while WHG trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check WHG's competition here
HOOD vs AXG Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 151.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while AXG trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check AXG's competition here
HOOD vs SUIG Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SUIG trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SUIG's competition here
HOOD vs SRL Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SRL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -43.79. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SRL's competition here
HOOD vs TCJH Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check TCJH's competition here
HOOD vs BTCS Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while BTCS trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check BTCS's competition here
HOOD vs SIEB Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SIEB trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SIEB's competition here
HOOD vs GRDI Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check GRDI's competition here
HOOD vs DOMH Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while DOMH trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check DOMH's competition here
HOOD vs PLUT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while PLUT trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check PLUT's competition here
HOOD vs ADEX-WT Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
HOOD vs HGBL Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while HGBL trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check HGBL's competition here
HOOD vs PROP Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while PROP trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -46.89. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PROP's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check PROP's competition here
HOOD vs SDIG Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check SDIG's competition here
HOOD vs MDBH Comparison June 2026
HOOD plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOOD stands at 81.7B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOOD is priced at $90.73, while MDBH trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOOD currently has a P/E ratio of 44.04, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, HOOD's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDBH's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HOOD is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOOD.Check MDBH's competition here