Trane Technologies plc (TT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | $459.09 | -1.45% | 102.5B | 35.45 | $13.08 | +0.84% |
| LII | $510.27 | -0.98% | 18B | 23.00 | $22.52 | +1.00% |
| CSL | $345.69 | +0.81% | 13.9B | 19.98 | $17.14 | +1.29% |
| AAON | $137.70 | -7.12% | 11.8B | 101.16 | $1.42 | +0.28% |
| WMS | $130.39 | -1.60% | 10.1B | 24.08 | $5.45 | +0.56% |
| OC | $119.40 | -0.63% | 9.7B | -25.40 | -$4.74 | +2.47% |
| BLDR | $74.03 | -0.31% | 8.1B | 28.61 | $2.62 | N/A |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
| BECN | $124.17 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 25.39 | $4.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TT vs LII Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while LII trades at $510.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check LII's competition here
TT vs CSL Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while CSL trades at $345.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSL's competition here
TT vs AAON Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while AAON trades at $137.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 101.16. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AAON's competition here
TT vs WMS Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while WMS trades at $130.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check WMS's competition here
TT vs OC Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while OC trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -25.40. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check OC's competition here
TT vs BLDR Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while BLDR trades at $74.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BLDR's competition here
TT vs FBHS Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FBHS's competition here
TT vs AZEK Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AZEK's competition here
TT vs BECN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BECN's competition here
TT vs SSD Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while SSD trades at $185.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SSD's competition here
TT vs AWI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while AWI trades at $154.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AWI's competition here
TT vs FBIN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while FBIN trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FBIN's competition here
TT vs GMS Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GMS's competition here
TT vs TREX Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while TREX trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check TREX's competition here
TT vs DOOR Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check DOOR's competition here
TT vs PGTI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PGTI's competition here
TT vs ROCK Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while ROCK trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ROCK's competition here
TT vs NX Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 818.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while NX trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check NX's competition here
TT vs APOG Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while APOG trades at $37.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check APOG's competition here
TT vs JBI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while JBI trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JBI's competition here
TT vs SWIM Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while SWIM trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 77.71. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SWIM's competition here
TT vs ASPN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while ASPN trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ASPN's competition here
TT vs BXC Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while BXC trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -105.17. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BXC's competition here
TT vs PHOE Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 344.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while PHOE trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 532.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PHOE's competition here
TT vs PPIH Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while PPIH trades at $32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PPIH's competition here
TT vs JELD Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 173.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while JELD trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JELD's competition here
TT vs SMJF Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while SMJF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 173.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SMJF's competition here
TT vs CSTE Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while CSTE trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSTE's competition here
TT vs APT Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while APT trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check APT's competition here
TT vs ILAG Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while ILAG trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ILAG's competition here
TT vs VIEW Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VIEW's competition here
TT vs AEHL Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 609.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while AEHL trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AEHL's competition here
TT vs VIEWW Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VIEWW's competition here
TT vs FRTA Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FRTA's competition here
TT vs AFI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AFI's competition here
TT vs LAYN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check LAYN's competition here
TT vs HW Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 102.5B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $459.09, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.45, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HW's competition here