Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while ETN trades at $417.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ETN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PH trades at $836.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PH's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CMI trades at $672.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CMI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while JCI trades at $141.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 43.41. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JCI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while EMR trades at $142.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check EMR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while ITW trades at $248.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PCAR trades at $112.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PCAR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CARR trades at $66.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CARR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while ROK trades at $463.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 48.22. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ROK's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SYM trades at $49.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -613.62. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SYM's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while DOV trades at $211.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DOV's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while IR trades at $71.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 48.38. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while P trades at $82.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas P's P/E ratio is 125.77. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to P's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check P's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while OTIS trades at $70.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OTIS's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while XYL trades at $110.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XYL's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while MAIR trades at $43.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 123.43. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MAIR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while FTV trades at $60.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FTV's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while ITT trades at $194.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ITT's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GNRC trades at $284.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 88.83. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GNRC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while NDSN trades at $287.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NDSN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while IEX trades at $212.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check IEX's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while RRX trades at $213.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 49.73. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RRX's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GGG trades at $74.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GGG's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PNR trades at $71.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PNR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SPXC trades at $230.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 44.08. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SPXC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CR trades at $186.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while WTS trades at $310.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WTS's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GTLS trades at $208.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is -204.18. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while DCI trades at $85.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check DCI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while FLS trades at $76.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FLS's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while OSK trades at $131.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OSK's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while AOS trades at $56.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AOS's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while MIDD trades at $155.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIDD's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while JBTM trades at $129.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBTM's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GTES trades at $26.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTES's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while NPO trades at $316.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 153.50. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPO's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PSN trades at $60.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AEBIV's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSWI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CSW trades at $271.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CSW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while FELE trades at $99.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check FELE's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while MIR trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 180.40. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while XMTR trades at $85.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -83.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XMTR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIMC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JBT's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while MWA trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MWA's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while KAI trades at $321.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KAI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SXI trades at $288.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SXI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while ATS trades at $29.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 56.39. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check ATS's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HLIO trades at $83.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HLIO's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while BW-PA trades at $22.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 80.07. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW-PA's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while AMSC trades at $51.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AMSC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check MIR-WT's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CYD trades at $58.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CYD's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CFX's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CXT trades at $36.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CXT's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHPW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while BW trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while THR trades at $61.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check THR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GRC trades at $75.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GRC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while BLDP trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BLDP's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while TNC trades at $85.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 51.09. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TNC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while NNE trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -44.91. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NNE's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GHM trades at $105.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 78.51. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GHM's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CIR trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CIR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 934.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PSIX trades at $40.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PSIX's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 773M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while KRNT trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -43.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check KRNT's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 604.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SERV trades at $9.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SERV's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 552.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while XE trades at $27.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -51.07. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XE's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 549.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while RR trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check RR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 478.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PKOH trades at $33.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PKOH's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while LXFR trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LXFR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while AIRJ trades at $5.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIRJ's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BGRY's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while OFLX trades at $30.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check OFLX's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SHMD trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMD's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 253.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while TWIN trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TWIN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HUHU trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HUHU's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while NPWR trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check NPWR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while TAYD trades at $53.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TAYD's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HURC trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HURC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HDRN trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HDRN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while BWEN trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BWEN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while AIRJW trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check AIRJW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while SHMDW trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check SHMDW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while PYR trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check PYR's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CVV trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CVV's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while LASE trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LASE's ROE of -6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check LASE's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while XCH trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check XCH's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while BURU trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check BURU's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while GTEC trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check GTEC's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while WFF trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WFF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check WFF's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HDRNW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HDRNW trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HDRNW's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HDRNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HDRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HDRNW's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while HCAI trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check HCAI's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while JCSE trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check JCSE's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while CGRN trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check CGRN's competition here

EPAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EPAC stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EPAC is priced at $33.16, while TPIC trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 20.84, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EPAC's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EPAC is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EPAC.Check TPIC's competition here