Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 256.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GEV trades at $962.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GEV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $455.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while EMR trades at $157.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check EMR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $267.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ITW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $521.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CMI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $111.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PCAR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $431.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ROK's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $55.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CARR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while IR trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check IR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $41.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SYM's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $189.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check DOV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $65.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check OTIS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $100.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check XYL's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $329.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check NDSN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $204.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ITT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $230.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check IEX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 612.67. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check INIO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $78.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GGG's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $212.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GNRC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MAIR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $360.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check LII's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $208.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $357.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check WTS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $155.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check RRX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $87.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check DCI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GTLS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $183.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MOD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while FLS trades at $73.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check FLS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $53.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PNR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $58.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AOS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $46.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ZWS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIDDV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $85.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 44.10. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AAON's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GTES's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $307.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check NPO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AEBIV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $53.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TEX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $110.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check JBTM's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CSWI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $105.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIDD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $21.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ALH's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $96.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check FELE's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $67.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ESAB's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check AIMC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check JBT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $125.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BMI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $14.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $21.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MWA's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $273.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SXI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $267.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KAI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $47.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CXT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $68.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HLIO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HI's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CFX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SHPW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $75.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GRC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $158.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ALG's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MFP trades at $40.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is 113.03. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MFP's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $35.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check EPAC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ATS's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MFPVV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -20.07. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BW-PA's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $67.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TNC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $47.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PSIX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $86.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 59.83. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GHM's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KODK's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 935.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $40.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check ASTE's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 920.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while PLOW trades at $39.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PLOW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 865.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 794.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $22.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 63.19. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check MTW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 766.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $16.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 57.07. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KRNT's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 679M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $47.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PKOH's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 569.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HY's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 469.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check CMCO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check LXFR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 381.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $26.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TWIN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SERV's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BGRY's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check VELO's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while FISN trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check FISN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 313.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -20.41. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check XE's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 294.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SHMD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 292M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check RR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check OFLX's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 253.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while PPIH trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check PPIH's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $17.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check GENC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BNC trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BNC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $62.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TAYD's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while SHMDW trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check SHMDW's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -21.44. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HURC's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while HUHU trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -107.07. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HUHU's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 133.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check NPWR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check KULR's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BWEN trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -67.67. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BWEN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while BWNB trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check BWNB's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while HDRN trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check HDRN's competition here

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PH stands at 122.4B. In comparison, TRBG has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PH is priced at $970.37 on the NYSE, while TRBG trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PH currently has a P/E ratio of 30.04, whereas TRBG's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, PH's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PH is less volatile compared to TRBG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PH.Check TRBG's competition here