Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 252.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GEV trades at $962.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GEV's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PH trades at $968.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PH's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while TT trades at $451.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check TT's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ITW trades at $271.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITW's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ITW's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CMI trades at $521.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CMI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PCAR trades at $111.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PCAR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ROK trades at $430.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ROK's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CARR trades at $55.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CARR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while IR trades at $76.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check IR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while SYM trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is 50.59. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check SYM's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while DOV trades at $190.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check DOV's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while OTIS trades at $66.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check OTIS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while XYL trades at $101.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check XYL's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ITT trades at $206.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to ITT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ITT's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while NDSN trades at $329.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check NDSN's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while IEX trades at $229.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check IEX's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, INIO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while INIO trades at $18.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas INIO's P/E ratio is 605.33. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INIO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to INIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check INIO's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while LII trades at $366.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check LII's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GGG trades at $77.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GGG's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MAIR trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 58.07. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MAIR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GNRC trades at $207.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GNRC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while WTS trades at $357.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to WTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check WTS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CR trades at $207.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while RRX trades at $157.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to RRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check RRX's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while DCI trades at $87.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to DCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check DCI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GTLS trades at $209.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GTLS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while FLS trades at $73.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to FLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check FLS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MOD trades at $184.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MOD's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PNR trades at $53.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PNR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while AOS trades at $58.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check AOS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ZWS trades at $46.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ZWS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while AAON trades at $85.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 44.22. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check AAON's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MIDDV has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MIDDV trades at $139.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MIDDV's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIDDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to MIDDV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MIDDV's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GTES trades at $26.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GTES's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while NPO trades at $308.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check NPO's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check AEBIV's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while TEX trades at $55.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check TEX's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while JBTM trades at $110.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check JBTM's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CSWI trades at $305.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CSWI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MIDD trades at $106.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MIDD's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ALH trades at $21.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ALH's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while FELE trades at $97.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to FELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check FELE's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ESAB trades at $68.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ESAB's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while AIMC trades at $61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check AIMC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while JBT trades at $125.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check JBT's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BMI trades at $126.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BMI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MIR trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MIR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MWA trades at $21.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to MWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MWA's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while SXI trades at $276.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check SXI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GTLS-PB's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while KAI trades at $272.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check KAI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CXT trades at $47.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CXT's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MIR-WT's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while HLIO trades at $68.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check HLIO's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while HI trades at $31.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check HI's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CFX trades at $39.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CFX's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while SHPW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check SHPW's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GRC trades at $76.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GRC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ALG trades at $157.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ALG's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MFP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MFP trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MFP's P/E ratio is 114.31. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to MFP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MFP's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ATS trades at $18.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to ATS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ATS's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while EPAC trades at $34.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check EPAC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MFPVV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MFPVV trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MFPVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFPVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to MFPVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MFPVV's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BW-PA trades at $17.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is -18.81. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BW-PA's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while TNC trades at $68.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check TNC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PSIX trades at $45.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PSIX's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GHM trades at $87.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 60.56. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to GHM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GHM's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 945.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while ASTE trades at $41.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check ASTE's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 938.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while KODK trades at $9.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check KODK's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 915.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PLOW trades at $39.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PLOW's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 856.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BW trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BW's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 795.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while MTW trades at $22.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 63.29. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check MTW's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 741.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while KRNT trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is 55.17. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check KRNT's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 683.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PKOH trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PKOH's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 566.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while HY trades at $32.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check HY's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 472M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while CMCO trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check CMCO's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 462.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while LXFR trades at $17.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check LXFR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while TWIN trades at $26.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check TWIN's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BURU trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BURU's ROE of +4.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BURU's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while SERV trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check SERV's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BGRY trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BGRY's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, FISN has a market cap of 327M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while FISN trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FISN's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FISN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to FISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check FISN's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while VELO trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check VELO's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while XE trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check XE's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while RR trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check RR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 287.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while SHMD trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check SHMD's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while OFLX trades at $26.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check OFLX's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 259M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while PPIH trades at $31.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check PPIH's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while GENC trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check GENC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BNC trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BNC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 209.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while TAYD trades at $65.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check TAYD's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while SHMDW trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check SHMDW's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while HUHU trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -114.34. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check HUHU's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while HURC trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check HURC's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 137.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while NPWR trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check NPWR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while KULR trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check KULR's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BWEN trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is -70.33. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BWEN's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while HDRN trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HDRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check HDRN's competition here

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE: EMR) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EMR stands at 89.3B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EMR is priced at $157.89 on the NYSE, while BWNB trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EMR currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, EMR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EMR is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EMR.Check BWNB's competition here