Flowserve Corporation (FLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | $75.08 | -0.57% | 9.6B | 27.59 | $2.72 | +1.14% |
| ETN | $400.08 | -0.13% | 155.4B | 39.15 | $10.22 | +1.07% |
| PH | $823.30 | -2.53% | 103.8B | 30.38 | $27.11 | +0.89% |
| CMI | $643.50 | -0.48% | 88.8B | 33.40 | $19.27 | +1.26% |
| JCI | $133.91 | -0.11% | 81.7B | 40.96 | $3.27 | +1.18% |
| EMR | $141.65 | -1.51% | 79.3B | 32.87 | $4.31 | +1.55% |
| ITW | $245.81 | -0.59% | 70.7B | 22.80 | $10.78 | +2.59% |
| PCAR | $109.47 | -0.82% | 57.6B | 23.29 | $4.70 | +2.54% |
| CARR | $65.11 | +1.94% | 54.1B | 43.40 | $1.50 | +1.45% |
| ROK | $456.71 | +1.25% | 50.8B | 47.53 | $9.61 | +1.21% |
Stock Comparison
FLS vs ETN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while ETN trades at $400.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ETN's competition here
FLS vs PH Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PH trades at $823.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PH's competition here
FLS vs CMI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CMI trades at $643.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CMI's competition here
FLS vs JCI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while JCI trades at $133.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JCI's competition here
FLS vs EMR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while EMR trades at $141.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EMR's competition here
FLS vs ITW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while ITW trades at $245.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITW's competition here
FLS vs PCAR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PCAR trades at $109.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PCAR's competition here
FLS vs CARR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CARR trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 43.40. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CARR's competition here
FLS vs ROK Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while ROK trades at $456.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 47.53. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ROK's competition here
FLS vs SYM Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SYM trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SYM's competition here
FLS vs P Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while P trades at $84.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas P's P/E ratio is 128.03. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to P's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check P's competition here
FLS vs DOV Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while DOV trades at $207.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DOV's competition here
FLS vs IR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while IR trades at $70.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 47.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IR's competition here
FLS vs OTIS Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while OTIS trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OTIS's competition here
FLS vs XYL Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while XYL trades at $108.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XYL's competition here
FLS vs MAIR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while MAIR trades at $43.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 125.43. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MAIR's competition here
FLS vs FTV Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while FTV trades at $58.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check FTV's competition here
FLS vs ITT Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while ITT trades at $189.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ITT's competition here
FLS vs GNRC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GNRC trades at $269.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 84.12. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GNRC's competition here
FLS vs NDSN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while NDSN trades at $281.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NDSN's competition here
FLS vs IEX Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while IEX trades at $207.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check IEX's competition here
FLS vs RRX Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while RRX trades at $202.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 47.02. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RRX's competition here
FLS vs GGG Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GGG trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS and GGG have similar daily volatility (2.93).Check GGG's competition here
FLS vs PNR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PNR trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PNR's competition here
FLS vs SPXC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SPXC trades at $220.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SPXC's competition here
FLS vs CR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CR trades at $182.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CR's competition here
FLS vs WTS Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while WTS trades at $306.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check WTS's competition here
FLS vs GTLS Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GTLS trades at $207.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is -203.73. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS's competition here
FLS vs DCI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while DCI trades at $81.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check DCI's competition here
FLS vs OSK Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while OSK trades at $126.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OSK's competition here
FLS vs AOS Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while AOS trades at $55.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AOS's competition here
FLS vs MIDD Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while MIDD trades at $156.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIDD's competition here
FLS vs JBTM Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while JBTM trades at $129.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBTM's competition here
FLS vs GTES Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GTES trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTES's competition here
FLS vs PSN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PSN trades at $60.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PSN's competition here
FLS vs AEBIV Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AEBIV's competition here
FLS vs NPO Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while NPO trades at $305.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 149.89. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPO's competition here
FLS vs XMTR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while XMTR trades at $95.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -93.38. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XMTR's competition here
FLS vs CSWI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CSWI's competition here
FLS vs CSW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CSW trades at $268.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CSW's competition here
FLS vs MIR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while MIR trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 178.00. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR's competition here
FLS vs FELE Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while FELE trades at $97.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check FELE's competition here
FLS vs AIMC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIMC's competition here
FLS vs JBT Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JBT's competition here
FLS vs MWA Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while MWA trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MWA's competition here
FLS vs KAI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while KAI trades at $315.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KAI's competition here
FLS vs SXI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SXI trades at $282.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SXI's competition here
FLS vs GTLS-PB Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
FLS vs ATS Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while ATS trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 55.68. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check ATS's competition here
FLS vs HLIO Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HLIO trades at $83.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HLIO's competition here
FLS vs BW-PA Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while BW-PA trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 79.76. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW-PA's competition here
FLS vs AMSC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while AMSC trades at $51.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AMSC's competition here
FLS vs MIR-WT Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check MIR-WT's competition here
FLS vs HI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HI's competition here
FLS vs CYD Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CYD trades at $57.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CYD's competition here
FLS vs CFX Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CFX's competition here
FLS vs CXT Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CXT trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CXT's competition here
FLS vs SHPW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHPW's competition here
FLS vs THR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while THR trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check THR's competition here
FLS vs GRC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GRC trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GRC's competition here
FLS vs BW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while BW trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BW's competition here
FLS vs BLDP Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while BLDP trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BLDP's competition here
FLS vs EPAC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while EPAC trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check EPAC's competition here
FLS vs TNC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while TNC trades at $85.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 51.03. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TNC's competition here
FLS vs NNE Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while NNE trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -43.68. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NNE's competition here
FLS vs CIR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CIR's competition here
FLS vs GHM Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GHM trades at $99.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 73.64. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GHM's competition here
FLS vs PSIX Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 907.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PSIX trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PSIX's competition here
FLS vs KRNT Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while KRNT trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -43.21. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check KRNT's competition here
FLS vs SERV Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SERV trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SERV's competition here
FLS vs RR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 569.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while RR trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -23.85. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check RR's competition here
FLS vs XE Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 529.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while XE trades at $26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -48.96. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XE's competition here
FLS vs LXFR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 471M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while LXFR trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LXFR's competition here
FLS vs PKOH Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PKOH trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PKOH's competition here
FLS vs AIRJ Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 356.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while AIRJ trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIRJ's competition here
FLS vs BGRY Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BGRY's competition here
FLS vs OFLX Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while OFLX trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is more volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check OFLX's competition here
FLS vs SHMD Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 285.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SHMD trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMD's competition here
FLS vs TWIN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while TWIN trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TWIN's competition here
FLS vs HUHU Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HUHU trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HUHU's competition here
FLS vs NPWR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 181.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while NPWR trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check NPWR's competition here
FLS vs TAYD Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while TAYD trades at $53.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TAYD's competition here
FLS vs HURC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HURC trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HURC's competition here
FLS vs HDRN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HDRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HDRN trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HDRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HDRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HDRN's competition here
FLS vs BWEN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while BWEN trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BWEN's competition here
FLS vs AIRJW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while AIRJW trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check AIRJW's competition here
FLS vs SHMDW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while SHMDW trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check SHMDW's competition here
FLS vs PYR Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check PYR's competition here
FLS vs CVV Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CVV trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CVV's competition here
FLS vs XCH Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while XCH trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check XCH's competition here
FLS vs BURU Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while BURU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check BURU's competition here
FLS vs GTEC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while GTEC trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check GTEC's competition here
FLS vs LASE Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while LASE trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LASE's ROE of -6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check LASE's competition here
FLS vs WFF Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while WFF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WFF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check WFF's competition here
FLS vs HDRNW Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HDRNW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HDRNW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HDRNW's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HDRNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HDRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HDRNW's competition here
FLS vs HCAI Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while HCAI trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check HCAI's competition here
FLS vs JCSE Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while JCSE trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check JCSE's competition here
FLS vs CGRN Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check CGRN's competition here
FLS vs TPIC Comparison June 2026
FLS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLS stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLS is priced at $75.08, while TPIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.59, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLS is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLS.Check TPIC's competition here