Lennox International Inc. (LII) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LII | $507.44 | -1.53% | 18B | 23.00 | $22.52 | +1.00% |
| TT | $455.18 | -2.29% | 102.5B | 35.45 | $13.08 | +0.84% |
| CSL | $344.17 | +0.37% | 13.9B | 19.98 | $17.14 | +1.29% |
| AAON | $135.36 | -8.70% | 11.8B | 101.16 | $1.42 | +0.28% |
| WMS | $130.46 | -1.55% | 10.1B | 24.08 | $5.45 | +0.56% |
| OC | $119.03 | -0.94% | 9.7B | -25.40 | -$4.74 | +2.47% |
| BLDR | $73.46 | -1.08% | 8.1B | 28.61 | $2.62 | N/A |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
| BECN | $124.17 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 25.39 | $4.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LII vs TT Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while TT trades at $455.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check TT's competition here
LII vs CSL Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while CSL trades at $344.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check CSL's competition here
LII vs AAON Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while AAON trades at $135.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 101.16. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AAON's competition here
LII vs WMS Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while WMS trades at $130.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check WMS's competition here
LII vs OC Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while OC trades at $119.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -25.40. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check OC's competition here
LII vs BLDR Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while BLDR trades at $73.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check BLDR's competition here
LII vs FBHS Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check FBHS's competition here
LII vs AZEK Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AZEK's competition here
LII vs BECN Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check BECN's competition here
LII vs SSD Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while SSD trades at $184.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check SSD's competition here
LII vs AWI Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while AWI trades at $153.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AWI's competition here
LII vs FBIN Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while FBIN trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check FBIN's competition here
LII vs GMS Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check GMS's competition here
LII vs TREX Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while TREX trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check TREX's competition here
LII vs DOOR Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check DOOR's competition here
LII vs PGTI Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check PGTI's competition here
LII vs ROCK Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while ROCK trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check ROCK's competition here
LII vs NX Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 818.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while NX trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check NX's competition here
LII vs APOG Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while APOG trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check APOG's competition here
LII vs JBI Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while JBI trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check JBI's competition here
LII vs SWIM Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 638.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while SWIM trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 77.71. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check SWIM's competition here
LII vs ASPN Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 517.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while ASPN trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check ASPN's competition here
LII vs BXC Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while BXC trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -105.17. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check BXC's competition here
LII vs PHOE Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 344.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while PHOE trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 532.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check PHOE's competition here
LII vs PPIH Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while PPIH trades at $31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check PPIH's competition here
LII vs JELD Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 173.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while JELD trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check JELD's competition here
LII vs SMJF Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while SMJF trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 173.33. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check SMJF's competition here
LII vs CSTE Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while CSTE trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check CSTE's competition here
LII vs APT Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while APT trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check APT's competition here
LII vs ILAG Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while ILAG trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check ILAG's competition here
LII vs VIEW Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check VIEW's competition here
LII vs AEHL Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 609.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while AEHL trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AEHL's competition here
LII vs VIEWW Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check VIEWW's competition here
LII vs FRTA Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check FRTA's competition here
LII vs AFI Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AFI's competition here
LII vs LAYN Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check LAYN's competition here
LII vs HW Comparison June 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 18B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $507.44, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 23.00, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check HW's competition here