SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LEDS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEDS | $1.95 | -6.70% | 16.1M | -6.72 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NVDA | $214.75 | -3.62% | 5.2T | 32.91 | $6.53 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $479.23 | -0.49% | 2.3T | 93.05 | $5.15 | +0.51% |
| TSM | $436.69 | -2.24% | 2.3T | 37.30 | $11.72 | +0.72% |
| MU | $1,079.57 | +1.45% | 1.2T | 50.85 | $21.23 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $542.52 | +4.02% | 884.6B | 179.64 | $3.02 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,726.36 | +1.23% | 665.4B | 57.55 | $30.00 | +0.51% |
| INTC | $112.71 | +4.43% | 566.5B | -187.85 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ARM | $411.83 | +2.26% | 438.2B | 484.51 | $0.85 | N/A |
| LRCX | $343.71 | +2.78% | 429.8B | 64.85 | $5.30 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
LEDS vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while NVDA trades at $214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVDA's competition here
LEDS vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AVGO trades at $479.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.05. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AVGO's competition here
LEDS vs TSM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while TSM trades at $436.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TSM's competition here
LEDS vs MU Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MU trades at $1,079.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MU's competition here
LEDS vs AMD Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 884.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AMD trades at $542.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 179.64. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMD's competition here
LEDS vs ASML Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 665.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ASML trades at $1,726.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 57.55. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ASML's competition here
LEDS vs INTC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 566.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while INTC trades at $112.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -187.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check INTC's competition here
LEDS vs ARM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 438.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ARM trades at $411.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 484.51. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ARM's competition here
LEDS vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 429.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while LRCX trades at $343.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 64.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LRCX's competition here
LEDS vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 397.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AMAT trades at $500.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 47.15. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMAT's competition here
LEDS vs TXN Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while TXN trades at $308.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.66. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TXN's competition here
LEDS vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 277.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while KLAC trades at $2,125.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 60.19. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check KLAC's competition here
LEDS vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 263.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MRVL trades at $301.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 103.66. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MRVL's competition here
LEDS vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 263.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while QCOM trades at $250.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QCOM's competition here
LEDS vs ADI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 213.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ADI trades at $437.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 65.03. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ADI's competition here
LEDS vs ASX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ASX trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 61.42. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ASX's competition here
LEDS vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MPWR trades at $1,689.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 120.36. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MPWR's competition here
LEDS vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while NXPI trades at $321.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NXPI's competition here
LEDS vs STM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while STM trades at $79.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 498.19. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check STM's competition here
LEDS vs TER Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while TER trades at $409.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TER's competition here
LEDS vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ALAB trades at $363.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 243.99. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ALAB's competition here
LEDS vs UMC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while UMC trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check UMC's competition here
LEDS vs ON Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ON trades at $133.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 99.19. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ON's competition here
LEDS vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MCHP trades at $96.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 438.68. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MCHP's competition here
LEDS vs GFS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while GFS trades at $85.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.80. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check GFS's competition here
LEDS vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while CBRS trades at $214.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 500.67. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CBRS's competition here
LEDS vs Q Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while Q trades at $155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.02. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check Q's competition here
LEDS vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while TSEM trades at $267.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 123.46. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TSEM's competition here
LEDS vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MTSI trades at $390.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 166.81. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MTSI's competition here
LEDS vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ENTG trades at $140.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 81.59. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ENTG's competition here
LEDS vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while LSCC trades at $154.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1104.29. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LSCC's competition here
LEDS vs SITM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SITM trades at $712.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -774.73. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SITM's competition here
LEDS vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AMKR trades at $75.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 43.22. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMKR's competition here
LEDS vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while RMBS trades at $170.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 81.66. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check RMBS's competition here
LEDS vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while NVMI trades at $530.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 66.34. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVMI's competition here
LEDS vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SMTC trades at $163.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -389.29. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SMTC's competition here
LEDS vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AAOI trades at $184.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -283.18. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AAOI's competition here
LEDS vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ONTO trades at $279.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 130.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ONTO's competition here
LEDS vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SWKS trades at $80.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SWKS's competition here
LEDS vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SIMO trades at $306.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SIMO's competition here
LEDS vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ALGM trades at $53.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -663.87. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ALGM's competition here
LEDS vs CREE Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CREE's competition here
LEDS vs FORM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while FORM trades at $126.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 144.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check FORM's competition here
LEDS vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while QRVO trades at $104.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QRVO's competition here
LEDS vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while CRUS trades at $178.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CRUS's competition here
LEDS vs VSH Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while VSH trades at $63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6398.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check VSH's competition here
LEDS vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while CAMT trades at $183.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 187.19. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CAMT's competition here
LEDS vs MXL Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MXL trades at $91.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -60.12. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MXL's competition here
LEDS vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check BRKS's competition here
LEDS vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SLAB trades at $219.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -144.16. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SLAB's competition here
LEDS vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while NVTS trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -48.90. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVTS's competition here
LEDS vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ACMR trades at $88.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 67.83. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ACMR's competition here
LEDS vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while KLIC trades at $108.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.24. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check KLIC's competition here
LEDS vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SYNA trades at $144.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -115.98. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SYNA's competition here
LEDS vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while DIOD trades at $116.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check DIOD's competition here
LEDS vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while IPGP trades at $121.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 178.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check IPGP's competition here
LEDS vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AXTI trades at $106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -333.44. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AXTI's competition here
LEDS vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ACLS trades at $159.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ACLS's competition here
LEDS vs POWI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while POWI trades at $84.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 283.30. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check POWI's competition here
LEDS vs LASR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while LASR trades at $76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.63. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LASR's competition here
LEDS vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while HIMX trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 127.32. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check HIMX's competition here
LEDS vs PI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while PI trades at $137.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -153.07. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check PI's competition here
LEDS vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while UCTT trades at $92.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check UCTT's competition here
LEDS vs VECO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while VECO trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 159.11. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check VECO's competition here
LEDS vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AEHR trades at $114.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -301.55. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AEHR's competition here
LEDS vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AMBA trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -45.84. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMBA's competition here
LEDS vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while WOLF trades at $61.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check WOLF's competition here
LEDS vs COHU Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while COHU trades at $56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -47.16. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check COHU's competition here
LEDS vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ICHR trades at $72.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.95. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ICHR's competition here
LEDS vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while IMOS trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 79.43. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check IMOS's competition here
LEDS vs POET Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while POET trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check POET's competition here
LEDS vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while PLAB trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check PLAB's competition here
LEDS vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SKYT trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SKYT's competition here
LEDS vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AMBQ trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -18.02. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMBQ's competition here
LEDS vs AIP Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AIP trades at $37.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -47.46. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AIP's competition here
LEDS vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while AOSL trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AOSL's competition here
LEDS vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while CEVA trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -108.83. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CEVA's competition here
LEDS vs SGH Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SGH's competition here
LEDS vs INDI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while INDI trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check INDI's competition here
LEDS vs QNC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while QNC trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QNC's competition here
LEDS vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MRAM trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2857.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MRAM's competition here
LEDS vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while NVEC trades at $110.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVEC's competition here
LEDS vs LAES Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 493.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while LAES trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LAES's competition here
LEDS vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 408.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while QUIK trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -30.73. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QUIK's competition here
LEDS vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 379.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ALMU trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -76.57. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ALMU's competition here
LEDS vs XPER Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 361.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while XPER trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check XPER's competition here
LEDS vs VLN Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while VLN trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check VLN's competition here
LEDS vs MX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while MX trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -21.77. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MX's competition here
LEDS vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TGAN's competition here
LEDS vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ASYS trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 117.06. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ASYS's competition here
LEDS vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ATOM trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ATOM's competition here
LEDS vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while GSIT trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check GSIT's competition here
LEDS vs INTT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while INTT trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 414.75. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check INTT's competition here
LEDS vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while BZAI trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check BZAI's competition here
LEDS vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while GCTS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check GCTS's competition here
LEDS vs NA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while NA trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NA's competition here
LEDS vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check OIIM's competition here
LEDS vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while ARBE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ARBE's competition here
LEDS vs TRT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 16.1M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.95, while TRT trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.72, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 237.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TRT's competition here