Impinj, Inc. (PI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while NVDA trades at $211.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVDA's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while TSM trades at $429.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TSM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AVGO trades at $398.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 69.93. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AVGO's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MU trades at $934.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MU's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 853.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AMD trades at $487.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 173.25. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMD's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 677.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ASML trades at $1,689.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 58.21. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ASML's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 561.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while INTC trades at $104.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -186.33. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check INTC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 420.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while LRCX trades at $320.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 63.47. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LRCX's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 418.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ARM trades at $357.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 457.49. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ARM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 398.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AMAT trades at $479.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 47.20. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMAT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while KLAC trades at $2,007.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 60.35. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check KLAC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 277.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while TXN trades at $292.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.11. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TXN's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 276.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MRVL trades at $294.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 108.63. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MRVL's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 255.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while QCOM trades at $229.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QCOM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 208.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ADI trades at $416.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ADI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ASX trades at $35.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.04. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ASX's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while NXPI trades at $306.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NXPI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MPWR trades at $1,549.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 117.71. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MPWR's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while STM trades at $73.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 489.62. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check STM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while TER trades at $382.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 75.21. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TER's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ALAB trades at $340.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 240.30. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ALAB's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MCHP trades at $92.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 437.64. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MCHP's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while UMC trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check UMC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ON trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 97.64. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ON's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while CBRS trades at $215.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 500.93. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CBRS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while GFS trades at $78.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check GFS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while Q trades at $147.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check Q's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while TSEM trades at $247.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 120.42. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TSEM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MTSI trades at $368.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 163.56. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MTSI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ENTG trades at $133.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ENTG's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while LSCC trades at $142.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1085.14. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LSCC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SITM trades at $664.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -759.89. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SITM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while RMBS trades at $155.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 80.60. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check RMBS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AMKR trades at $69.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMKR's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while NVMI trades at $497.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVMI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AAOI trades at $196.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -312.05. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AAOI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SMTC trades at $161.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -403.21. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SMTC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ONTO trades at $264.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 128.43. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ONTO's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SWKS trades at $75.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SWKS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ALGM trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -670.25. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ALGM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SIMO trades at $280.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SIMO's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while FORM trades at $121.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 145.52. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check FORM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CREE's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while QRVO trades at $99.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QRVO's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while CRUS trades at $168.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CRUS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while VSH trades at $60.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6367.30. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VSH's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MXL trades at $87.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -61.98. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MXL's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while CAMT trades at $172.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 184.86. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CAMT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check BRKS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while NVTS trades at $26.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -48.63. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVTS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SLAB trades at $218.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -145.03. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SLAB's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ACMR trades at $81.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 68.86. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ACMR's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while KLIC trades at $102.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 103.38. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check KLIC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SYNA trades at $131.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -112.87. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SYNA's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while IPGP trades at $115.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 180.21. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check IPGP's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while DIOD trades at $105.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 60.81. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check DIOD's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ACLS trades at $156.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ACLS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AXTI trades at $101.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -331.22. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AXTI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while POWI trades at $81.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 284.33. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check POWI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while LASR trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -249.63. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LASR's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while UCTT trades at $87.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check UCTT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while HIMX trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 125.95. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check HIMX's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while VECO trades at $61.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 167.49. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VECO's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AEHR trades at $107.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -306.79. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AEHR's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while WOLF trades at $60.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check WOLF's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AMBA trades at $67.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.75. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMBA's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while COHU trades at $52.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -46.93. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check COHU's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ICHR trades at $67.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.01. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ICHR's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while IMOS trades at $59.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 81.10. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check IMOS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while POET trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check POET's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SKYT trades at $36.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SKYT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while PLAB trades at $30.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check PLAB's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AMBQ trades at $78.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMBQ's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AIP trades at $35.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AIP's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while AOSL trades at $45.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AOSL's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while CEVA trades at $45.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.78. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CEVA's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SGH's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while INDI trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check INDI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 721.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while QNC trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QNC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 666.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MRAM trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2842.00. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MRAM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while NVEC trades at $102.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVEC's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 517.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while LAES trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LAES's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while QUIK trades at $21.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -31.65. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QUIK's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 385.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ALMU trades at $23.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -77.74. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ALMU's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while XPER trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check XPER's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while VLN trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VLN's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TGAN's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 317.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ASYS trades at $20.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.72. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ASYS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while MX trades at $7.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MX's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 294.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ATOM trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ATOM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while GSIT trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -22.74. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check GSIT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while INTT trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 429.75. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check INTT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while BZAI trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check BZAI's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while GCTS trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check GCTS's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while NA trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NA's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check OIIM's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while ARBE trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ARBE's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while TRT trades at $11.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 250.20. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TRT's competition here

PI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $128.82, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of -151.31, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check IDBA's competition here