Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $225.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check NVDA's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $450.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check TSM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $352.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AVGO's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $191.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SKHY's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $1,082.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MU's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $630.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 109.48. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AMD's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 672.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,743.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ASML's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 620.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 215.79. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check INTC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 394.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $315.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check LRCX's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 385.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $485.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.45. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AMAT's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $310.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 175.32. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ARM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $278.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check TXN's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $187.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check KLAC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 229.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $261.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 79.37. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MRVL's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $201.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check QCOM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $393.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ADI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $44.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ASX's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,367.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 72.62. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MPWR's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $218.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check TEL's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $364.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 147.02. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ALAB's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $398.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check TER's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $24.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check UMC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $238.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check NXPI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $206.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5168.75. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check CBRS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $51.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 87.99. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check STM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $78.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MCHP's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $210.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check CRDO's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MCHPP trades at $67.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 99.06. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MCHPP's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $77.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ON's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $124.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check Q's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $230.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check TSEM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check GFS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $151.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 47.32. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ENTG's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $285.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MTSI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $128.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 83.15. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check LSCC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $662.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 107.16. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SITM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $182.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 99.08. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SMTC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $287.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 59.32. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ONTO's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $89.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SWKS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $53.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AMKR's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $368.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check NVMI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $105.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check RMBS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $117.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check QRVO's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $129.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 80.06. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check FORM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check CREE's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $276.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.98. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SIMO's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $93.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 164.63. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MXL's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check BRKS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $221.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 145.55. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SLAB's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $147.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 47.13. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check CAMT's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $36.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ALGM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $119.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check CRUS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $178.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 88.28. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check PI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $77.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ACMR's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $91.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check KLIC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 112.26. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check VSH's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $95.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check DIOD's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $102.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SYNA's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $78.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -328.92. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AXTI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $123.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ACLS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $77.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 51.45. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check UCTT's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $104.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3479.67. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AEHR's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $78.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 80.54. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check IPGP's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $72.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 110.12. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AMBA's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -64.21. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check NVTS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -372.22. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check COHU's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $43.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -53.37. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check OUST's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $49.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 46.42. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check VECO's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $52.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check POWI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $56.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check PENG's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $14.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 70.10. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check HIMX's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $71.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check IMOS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $40.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 84.03. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check LASR's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $57.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 113.61. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ICHR's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $30.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check PLAB's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $69.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AMBQ's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SKYT's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $27.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check WOLF's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check SGH's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $23.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -85.32. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AIP's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $15.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AEVA's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check POET's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $36.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 90.50. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check CEVA's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 924.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 125.69. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check KOPN's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $27.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -96.31. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check AOSL's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 776.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check DQ's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 638.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check INDI's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 527.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $109.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check NVEC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $18.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -386.40. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check MRAM's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 414.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -41.56. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check QNC's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 409.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check VLN-WT's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check LAES's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check TGAN's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ASYS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check GSIT's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check VLN's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check GCTS's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check QUIK's competition here

Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ALMU stands at 243.3M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ALMU is priced at $13.29 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ALMU currently has a P/E ratio of -110.75, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, ALMU's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ALMU is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ALMU.Check ATOM's competition here