Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while NVDA trades at $225.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check NVDA's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while TSM trades at $450.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check TSM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AVGO trades at $352.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AVGO's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SKHY trades at $191.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SKHY's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MU trades at $1,082.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MU's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AMD trades at $630.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 109.48. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AMD's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 672.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ASML trades at $1,743.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ASML's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 620.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while INTC trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 215.79. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check INTC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 394.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while LRCX trades at $315.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check LRCX's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 385.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AMAT trades at $485.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.45. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AMAT's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ARM trades at $310.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 175.32. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ARM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while TXN trades at $278.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check TXN's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while KLAC trades at $187.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check KLAC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 229.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MRVL trades at $261.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 79.37. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MRVL's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while QCOM trades at $201.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check QCOM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ADI trades at $393.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ADI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ASX trades at $44.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 51.53. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ASX's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MPWR trades at $1,367.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 72.62. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MPWR's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while TEL trades at $218.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check TEL's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ALAB trades at $364.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 147.02. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ALAB's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while TER trades at $398.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check TER's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while UMC trades at $24.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check UMC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while NXPI trades at $238.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check NXPI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while CBRS trades at $206.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5168.75. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check CBRS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while STM trades at $51.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 87.99. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check STM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MCHP trades at $78.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MCHP's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while CRDO trades at $210.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check CRDO's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MCHPP trades at $67.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 99.06. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MCHPP's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ON trades at $77.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ON's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while Q trades at $124.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check Q's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while TSEM trades at $230.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check TSEM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while GFS trades at $49.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check GFS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ENTG trades at $151.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 47.32. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ENTG's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MTSI trades at $285.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MTSI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while LSCC trades at $128.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 83.15. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check LSCC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SITM trades at $662.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 107.16. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SITM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SMTC trades at $182.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 99.08. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SMTC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SWKS trades at $89.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SWKS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AMKR trades at $53.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AMKR's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while NVMI trades at $368.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check NVMI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while RMBS trades at $105.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check RMBS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while QRVO trades at $117.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check QRVO's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while FORM trades at $129.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 80.06. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check FORM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check CREE's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SIMO trades at $276.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.98. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SIMO's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MXL trades at $93.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 164.63. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MXL's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check BRKS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SLAB trades at $221.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 145.55. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SLAB's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while CAMT trades at $147.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 47.13. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check CAMT's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ALGM trades at $36.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ALGM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while CRUS trades at $119.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check CRUS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while PI trades at $178.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 88.28. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check PI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ACMR trades at $77.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ACMR's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while KLIC trades at $91.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check KLIC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while VSH trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 112.26. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check VSH's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while DIOD trades at $95.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check DIOD's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SYNA trades at $102.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SYNA's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AXTI trades at $78.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -328.92. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AXTI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ACLS trades at $123.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ACLS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while UCTT trades at $77.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 51.45. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check UCTT's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AEHR trades at $104.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3479.67. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AEHR's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while IPGP trades at $78.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 80.54. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check IPGP's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AMBA trades at $72.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 110.12. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AMBA's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while NVTS trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -64.21. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check NVTS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while COHU trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -372.22. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check COHU's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while OUST trades at $43.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -53.37. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check OUST's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while VECO trades at $49.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 46.42. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check VECO's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while POWI trades at $52.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check POWI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while PENG trades at $56.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check PENG's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while HIMX trades at $14.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 70.10. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check HIMX's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while IMOS trades at $71.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check IMOS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while LASR trades at $40.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 84.03. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check LASR's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ICHR trades at $57.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 113.61. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ICHR's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while PLAB trades at $30.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check PLAB's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AMBQ trades at $69.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AMBQ's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SKYT's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while WOLF trades at $27.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check WOLF's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check SGH's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AIP trades at $23.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -85.32. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AIP's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AEVA trades at $15.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AEVA's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while POET trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check POET's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while CEVA trades at $36.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 90.50. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check CEVA's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 924.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while KOPN trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 125.69. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check KOPN's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 835.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while AOSL trades at $27.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -96.31. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check AOSL's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 776.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while DQ trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check DQ's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 638.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while INDI trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check INDI's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 527.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while NVEC trades at $109.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check NVEC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while MRAM trades at $18.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -386.40. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check MRAM's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 414.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while QNC trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -41.56. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check QNC's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 409.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check VLN-WT's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while LAES trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check LAES's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check TGAN's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ASYS trades at $15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ASYS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ALMU trades at $13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -110.75. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ALMU's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while GSIT trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check GSIT's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while VLN trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check VLN's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while GCTS trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check GCTS's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 194.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while QUIK trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check QUIK's competition here

Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONTO stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONTO is priced at $287.64 on the NYSE, while ATOM trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONTO currently has a P/E ratio of 59.32, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, ONTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ONTO is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONTO.Check ATOM's competition here