Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NVTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVTS | $25.08 | -18.23% | 5.9B | -39.81 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| NVDA | $205.10 | -6.20% | 5T | 31.41 | $6.53 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $415.17 | -6.69% | 2.2T | 35.33 | $11.75 | +0.77% |
| AVGO | $385.73 | -7.92% | 1.8T | 64.40 | $5.99 | +0.64% |
| MU | $864.01 | -13.25% | 974.4B | 40.74 | $21.21 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $466.38 | -10.86% | 760.5B | 154.43 | $3.02 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,641.74 | -6.59% | 632.8B | 54.38 | $30.19 | +0.53% |
| INTC | $99.17 | -11.28% | 498.4B | -165.28 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $303.28 | -9.85% | 379.3B | 57.44 | $5.28 | +0.33% |
| ARM | $342.93 | -12.84% | 364.9B | 398.76 | $0.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NVTS vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while NVDA trades at $205.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVDA's competition here
NVTS vs TSM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while TSM trades at $415.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TSM's competition here
NVTS vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AVGO trades at $385.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 64.40. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AVGO's competition here
NVTS vs MU Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 974.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MU trades at $864.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MU's competition here
NVTS vs AMD Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 760.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AMD trades at $466.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 154.43. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMD's competition here
NVTS vs ASML Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 632.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ASML trades at $1,641.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.38. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASML's competition here
NVTS vs INTC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 498.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while INTC trades at $99.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -165.28. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INTC's competition here
NVTS vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 379.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while LRCX trades at $303.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LRCX's competition here
NVTS vs ARM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 364.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ARM trades at $342.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 398.76. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ARM's competition here
NVTS vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 359.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AMAT trades at $453.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMAT's competition here
NVTS vs TXN Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 259B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while TXN trades at $285.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.57. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TXN's competition here
NVTS vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 252B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while KLAC trades at $1,929.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KLAC's competition here
NVTS vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 230.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MRVL trades at $263.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 90.54. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MRVL's competition here
NVTS vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 227.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while QCOM trades at $215.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QCOM's competition here
NVTS vs ADI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 195.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ADI trades at $401.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 59.64. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ADI's competition here
NVTS vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while NXPI trades at $295.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NXPI's competition here
NVTS vs ASX Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ASX trades at $34.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASX's competition here
NVTS vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MPWR trades at $1,481.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 105.28. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MPWR's competition here
NVTS vs STM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while STM trades at $70.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 441.88. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check STM's competition here
NVTS vs TER Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while TER trades at $357.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 66.16. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TER's competition here
NVTS vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ALAB trades at $317.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 212.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALAB's competition here
NVTS vs UMC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while UMC trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check UMC's competition here
NVTS vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MCHP trades at $88.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 401.55. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MCHP's competition here
NVTS vs ON Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ON trades at $117.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 86.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ON's competition here
NVTS vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while CBRS trades at $201.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 490.27. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CBRS's competition here
NVTS vs GFS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while GFS trades at $75.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GFS's competition here
NVTS vs Q Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while Q trades at $142.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 45.82. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check Q's competition here
NVTS vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MTSI trades at $345.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 147.61. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MTSI's competition here
NVTS vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while TSEM trades at $235.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 108.52. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TSEM's competition here
NVTS vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ENTG trades at $125.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ENTG's competition here
NVTS vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while LSCC trades at $135.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 967.43. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LSCC's competition here
NVTS vs SITM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SITM trades at $625.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -672.77. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SITM's competition here
NVTS vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AMKR trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMKR's competition here
NVTS vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while RMBS trades at $145.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 69.20. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check RMBS's competition here
NVTS vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while NVMI trades at $475.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 59.77. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVMI's competition here
NVTS vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AAOI trades at $177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -272.31. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AAOI's competition here
NVTS vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SMTC trades at $151.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -368.34. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SMTC's competition here
NVTS vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ONTO trades at $253.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 118.35. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ONTO's competition here
NVTS vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SWKS trades at $73.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SWKS's competition here
NVTS vs CREE Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CREE's competition here
NVTS vs FORM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while FORM trades at $116.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 134.14. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check FORM's competition here
NVTS vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SIMO trades at $258.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SIMO's competition here
NVTS vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while QRVO trades at $98.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QRVO's competition here
NVTS vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ALGM trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -579.87. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALGM's competition here
NVTS vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while CRUS trades at $164.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CRUS's competition here
NVTS vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check BRKS's competition here
NVTS vs VSH Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while VSH trades at $57.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5719.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VSH's competition here
NVTS vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while CAMT trades at $164.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 167.56. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CAMT's competition here
NVTS vs MXL Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MXL trades at $80.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -53.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MXL's competition here
NVTS vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SLAB trades at $218.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -144.44. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SLAB's competition here
NVTS vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while KLIC trades at $98.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 94.38. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KLIC's competition here
NVTS vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ACMR trades at $76.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ACMR's competition here
NVTS vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SYNA trades at $122.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -97.44. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SYNA's competition here
NVTS vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while DIOD trades at $101.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 54.63. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check DIOD's competition here
NVTS vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while IPGP trades at $107.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 155.61. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IPGP's competition here
NVTS vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ACLS trades at $147.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ACLS's competition here
NVTS vs POWI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while POWI trades at $77.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 256.73. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check POWI's competition here
NVTS vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AXTI trades at $89.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AXTI's competition here
NVTS vs LASR Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while LASR trades at $65.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -219.50. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LASR's competition here
NVTS vs PI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while PI trades at $120.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -135.88. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check PI's competition here
NVTS vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while UCTT trades at $82.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check UCTT's competition here
NVTS vs VECO Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while VECO trades at $58.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 153.82. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VECO's competition here
NVTS vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while HIMX trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 105.68. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check HIMX's competition here
NVTS vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AEHR trades at $98.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -259.08. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AEHR's competition here
NVTS vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AMBA trades at $63.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -39.45. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMBA's competition here
NVTS vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while WOLF trades at $55.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check WOLF's competition here
NVTS vs COHU Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while COHU trades at $49.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -41.86. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check COHU's competition here
NVTS vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ICHR trades at $62.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -42.51. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ICHR's competition here
NVTS vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while IMOS trades at $57.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 72.99. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IMOS's competition here
NVTS vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SKYT trades at $34.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SKYT's competition here
NVTS vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while PLAB trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check PLAB's competition here
NVTS vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AMBQ trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -16.19. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMBQ's competition here
NVTS vs AIP Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AIP trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -43.39. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AIP's competition here
NVTS vs POET Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while POET trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check POET's competition here
NVTS vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while AOSL trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AOSL's competition here
NVTS vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while CEVA trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -94.73. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CEVA's competition here
NVTS vs SGH Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SGH's competition here
NVTS vs INDI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 855.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while INDI trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INDI's competition here
NVTS vs QNC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 653.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while QNC trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QNC's competition here
NVTS vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 554.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MRAM trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2366.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MRAM's competition here
NVTS vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 493.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while NVEC trades at $102.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVEC's competition here
NVTS vs LAES Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while LAES trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LAES's competition here
NVTS vs XPER Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while XPER trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check XPER's competition here
NVTS vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 354.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while QUIK trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QUIK's competition here
NVTS vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TGAN's competition here
NVTS vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ALMU trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -64.54. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALMU's competition here
NVTS vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ATOM trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ATOM's competition here
NVTS vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ASYS trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 102.72. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASYS's competition here
NVTS vs MX Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 252.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while MX trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MX's competition here
NVTS vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while GSIT trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GSIT's competition here
NVTS vs VLN Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 222.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while VLN trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VLN's competition here
NVTS vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 185.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while BZAI trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check BZAI's competition here
NVTS vs INTT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 185.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while INTT trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 368.75. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INTT's competition here
NVTS vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while GCTS trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GCTS's competition here
NVTS vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check OIIM's competition here
NVTS vs NA Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while NA trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NA's competition here
NVTS vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while ARBE trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ARBE's competition here
NVTS vs TRT Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while TRT trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 208.60. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TRT's competition here
NVTS vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $25.08, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -39.81, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IDBA's competition here