Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $228.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVDA's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $452.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TSM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $349.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AVGO's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $181.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SKHY's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $1,053.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MU's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 991.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $607.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 105.53. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMD's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 682.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,771.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 55.32. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ASML's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 585.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $116.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 203.56. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check INTC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 386.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $486.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.62. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMAT's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 302.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $283.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 160.07. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ARM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 254.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $278.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TXN's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 247.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $189.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 50.31. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check KLAC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 220.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $251.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 76.33. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MRVL's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 196.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $187.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QCOM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $395.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ADI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $43.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ASX's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,351.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 71.76. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MPWR's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $401.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TER's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $214.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TEL's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $351.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 141.66. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ALAB's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $236.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NXPI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $23.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check UMC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $52.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 89.38. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check STM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $196.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4918.50. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CBRS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $77.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MCHP's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MCHPP trades at $66.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 98.23. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MCHPP's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $192.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 56.34. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CRDO's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $75.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ON's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $47.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check GFS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $124.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check Q's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $226.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 79.03. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TSEM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $150.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 46.93. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ENTG's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $278.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 62.60. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MTSI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $656.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 106.25. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SITM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $124.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 80.54. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check LSCC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $174.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 94.99. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SMTC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $288.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 59.52. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ONTO's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $53.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMKR's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $87.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SWKS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $370.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVMI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $102.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check RMBS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $116.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QRVO's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $130.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 80.85. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check FORM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CREE's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $278.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 61.38. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SIMO's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 157.89. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MXL's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check BRKS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $221.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 145.41. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SLAB's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $36.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 68.41. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ALGM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $142.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CAMT's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $119.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CRUS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $176.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 87.58. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check PI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $75.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 50.97. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ACMR's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $91.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check KLIC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $32.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 111.16. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VSH's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $96.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check DIOD's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $100.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SYNA's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $124.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ACLS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $73.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -306.96. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AXTI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $78.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 51.70. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check UCTT's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $77.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 79.62. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check IPGP's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $98.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3283.00. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AEHR's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $66.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -367.06. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check COHU's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -61.74. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVTS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $68.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 104.06. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMBA's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $49.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VECO's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $40.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -49.88. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check OUST's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check POWI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $54.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check PENG's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $71.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check IMOS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $13.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 67.77. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check HIMX's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $39.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 82.40. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check LASR's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $59.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 116.51. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ICHR's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check PLAB's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $68.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMBQ's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SKYT's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $27.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check WOLF's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SGH's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $23.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -82.57. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AIP's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 978.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check POET's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 966.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $34.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 86.73. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CEVA's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 963.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $14.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AEVA's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 880.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 119.65. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check KOPN's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 818.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $27.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -94.34. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AOSL's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 737.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check DQ's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 612.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check INDI's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 531.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $109.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVEC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 484.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -48.55. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QNC's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 425.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $18.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -379.29. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MRAM's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 389.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VLN-WT's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check LAES's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TGAN's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ASYS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 233.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -106.33. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ALMU's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $5.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check GSIT's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 198.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check GCTS's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VLN's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QUIK's competition here

Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 393.3B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $314.47 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 54.03, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ATOM's competition here