Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while COP trades at $116.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check COP's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CNQ trades at $46.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CNQ's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EOG trades at $137.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EOG's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check PXD's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while OXY trades at $58.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 79.62. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check OXY's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while FANG trades at $200.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 203.09. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check FANG's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check HES's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while WDS trades at $22.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check WDS's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while OXY-WT trades at $36.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check OXY-WT's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EQT trades at $54.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EQT's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while DVN trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check DVN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while TPL trades at $369.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 50.66. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check TPL's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CTRA trades at $32.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CTRA's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EXE trades at $91.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EXE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check COG's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while OVV trades at $58.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check OVV's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check MRO's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while PR trades at $19.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check PR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while APA trades at $37.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check APA's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while AR trades at $36.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check AR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CHK's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CHKEW's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while RRC trades at $39.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check RRC's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CHKEZ's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CHKEL's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while VIST trades at $76.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check VIST's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SWN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SM trades at $32.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SM's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CHRD trades at $137.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -133.98. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CHRD's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while MTDR trades at $55.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check MTDR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CEO's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CRC trades at $60.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CRC's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while MUR trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check MUR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CPG's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while MGY trades at $27.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check MGY's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CNX trades at $33.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CNX's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check OAS's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check DEN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check BCEI's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CDEV's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check ERF's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CRGY trades at $11.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CRGY's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CRK trades at $13.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CRK's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check VRN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while BTE trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check BTE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CLMT trades at $35.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CLMT's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while GPOR trades at $168.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check GPOR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check ESTE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while BKV trades at $26.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check BKV's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while BSM trades at $13.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check BSM's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while TALO trades at $14.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check TALO's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CPE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while NOG trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check NOG's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while CIVI trades at $27.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check CIVI's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while MNR trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check MNR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while NEXT trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check NEXT's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check STRDW's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while KRP trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check KRP's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check HHRS's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while KOS trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check KOS's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while DMLP trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check DMLP's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check FLMN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SBR trades at $76.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SBR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while DEC trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check DEC's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while IMPPP trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.88. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check IMPPP's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 942.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while HPK trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check HPK's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SBOW's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 939.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while TBN trades at $32.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check TBN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check TELL's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 778.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while OBE trades at $12.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1157.00. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check OBE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 772.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while REPX trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check REPX's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 739.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while VTS trades at $18.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -36.18. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check VTS's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while TXO trades at $13.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check TXO's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check ROCC's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while VTLE trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check VTLE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while GRNT trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check GRNT's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while WTI trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check WTI's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while GPRK trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check GPRK's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check PVAC's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 568.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EGY trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EGY's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SD trades at $15.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SD's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while GFR trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -53.09. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check GFR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while GTE trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check GTE's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while PNRG trades at $183.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check PNRG's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while REI trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check REI's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while BRY trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check BRY's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while INR trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check INR's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while IMPP trades at $5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check IMPP's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while AMPY trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check AMPY's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while KGEI trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check KGEI's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SJT trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -192.50. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SJT's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check PHX's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EPM trades at $4.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -35.75. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EPM's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EPSN trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EPSN's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while ANNA trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check ANNA's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while SAFX trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check SAFX's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while EP trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check EP's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while GLND trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check GLND's competition here

VET plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VET stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VET is priced at $11.64, while NRT trades at $8.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VET currently has a P/E ratio of -4.85, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, VET's ROE is -0.34%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VET is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VET.Check NRT's competition here