EQT Corporation (EQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQT | $53.75 | -2.70% | 33.6B | 10.20 | $5.27 | +1.21% |
| COP | $117.14 | -1.75% | 142.7B | 19.85 | $5.90 | +2.81% |
| CNQ | $45.70 | -4.11% | 95.3B | 11.31 | $4.04 | +3.80% |
| EOG | $137.78 | -2.20% | 73.4B | 13.55 | $10.17 | +2.92% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $56.93 | -2.97% | 56.6B | 76.94 | $0.74 | +1.71% |
| FANG | $192.62 | -5.09% | 54.2B | 198.58 | $0.97 | +2.13% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $21.33 | -4.39% | 40.5B | 15.05 | $1.42 | +5.24% |
| OXY-WT | $34.88 | -4.62% | 34.8B | N/A | N/A | +1.71% |
Stock Comparison
EQT vs COP Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while COP trades at $117.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check COP's competition here
EQT vs CNQ Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CNQ trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CNQ's competition here
EQT vs EOG Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while EOG trades at $137.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EOG's competition here
EQT vs PXD Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PXD's competition here
EQT vs OXY Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while OXY trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 76.94. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OXY's competition here
EQT vs FANG Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while FANG trades at $192.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 198.58. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check FANG's competition here
EQT vs HES Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HES's competition here
EQT vs WDS Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while WDS trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WDS's competition here
EQT vs OXY-WT Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while OXY-WT trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OXY-WT's competition here
EQT vs DVN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while DVN trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DVN's competition here
EQT vs TPL Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while TPL trades at $389.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TPL's competition here
EQT vs CTRA Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CTRA's competition here
EQT vs EXE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while EXE trades at $92.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EXE's competition here
EQT vs COG Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check COG's competition here
EQT vs MRO Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MRO's competition here
EQT vs OVV Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while OVV trades at $56.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OVV's competition here
EQT vs PR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while PR trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PR's competition here
EQT vs APA Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while APA trades at $36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check APA's competition here
EQT vs AR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while AR trades at $35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check AR's competition here
EQT vs CHK Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHK's competition here
EQT vs CHKEW Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEW's competition here
EQT vs RRC Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while RRC trades at $39.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check RRC's competition here
EQT vs CHKEZ Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEZ's competition here
EQT vs CHKEL Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHKEL's competition here
EQT vs SWN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SWN's competition here
EQT vs VIST Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while VIST trades at $74.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VIST's competition here
EQT vs SM Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SM trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SM's competition here
EQT vs CHRD Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CHRD trades at $134.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -129.61. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CHRD's competition here
EQT vs MTDR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while MTDR trades at $53.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MTDR's competition here
EQT vs CEO Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CEO's competition here
EQT vs MUR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while MUR trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 65.54. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MUR's competition here
EQT vs CPG Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CPG's competition here
EQT vs CRC Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CRC trades at $58.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRC's competition here
EQT vs MGY Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while MGY trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MGY's competition here
EQT vs CNX Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CNX trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CNX's competition here
EQT vs OAS Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OAS's competition here
EQT vs DEN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DEN's competition here
EQT vs BCEI Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BCEI's competition here
EQT vs CDEV Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CDEV's competition here
EQT vs ERF Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ERF's competition here
EQT vs CRK Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CRK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRK's competition here
EQT vs CRGY Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CRGY trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CRGY's competition here
EQT vs VRN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VRN's competition here
EQT vs BTE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while BTE trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BTE's competition here
EQT vs CLMT Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CLMT trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -16.28. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CLMT's competition here
EQT vs GPOR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while GPOR trades at $168.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GPOR's competition here
EQT vs ESTE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ESTE's competition here
EQT vs BSM Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while BSM trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BSM's competition here
EQT vs BKV Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while BKV trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BKV's competition here
EQT vs TALO Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while TALO trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TALO's competition here
EQT vs CPE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CPE's competition here
EQT vs CIVI Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check CIVI's competition here
EQT vs NEXT Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while NEXT trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NEXT's competition here
EQT vs MNR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while MNR trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check MNR's competition here
EQT vs NOG Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while NOG trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NOG's competition here
EQT vs STRDW Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check STRDW's competition here
EQT vs VET Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while VET trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VET's competition here
EQT vs KRP Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while KRP trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KRP's competition here
EQT vs HHRS Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HHRS's competition here
EQT vs KOS Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while KOS trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KOS's competition here
EQT vs DMLP Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while DMLP trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DMLP's competition here
EQT vs FLMN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check FLMN's competition here
EQT vs SBR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SBR trades at $77.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SBR's competition here
EQT vs TBN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while TBN trades at $35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -19.41. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TBN's competition here
EQT vs DEC Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while DEC trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check DEC's competition here
EQT vs IMPPP Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 964.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while IMPPP trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.45. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check IMPPP's competition here
EQT vs HPK Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 955.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while HPK trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HPK's competition here
EQT vs SBOW Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SBOW's competition here
EQT vs TELL Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TELL's competition here
EQT vs REPX Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 754.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while REPX trades at $34.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check REPX's competition here
EQT vs OBE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 745.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while OBE trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1108.00. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check OBE's competition here
EQT vs TXO Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 744.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while TXO trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check TXO's competition here
EQT vs VTS Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while VTS trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -35.92. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VTS's competition here
EQT vs ROCC Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ROCC's competition here
EQT vs VTLE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check VTLE's competition here
EQT vs GRNT Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while GRNT trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GRNT's competition here
EQT vs PVAC Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PVAC's competition here
EQT vs GPRK Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 555.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while GPRK trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GPRK's competition here
EQT vs EGY Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while EGY trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EGY's competition here
EQT vs WTI Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 550.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while WTI trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check WTI's competition here
EQT vs SD Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 546.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SD trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SD's competition here
EQT vs GFR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 409.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while GFR trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -51.45. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GFR's competition here
EQT vs PNRG Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 297.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while PNRG trades at $183.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PNRG's competition here
EQT vs GTE Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 269.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while GTE trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check GTE's competition here
EQT vs REI Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while REI trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check REI's competition here
EQT vs BRY Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check BRY's competition here
EQT vs INR Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while INR trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check INR's competition here
EQT vs KGEI Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while KGEI trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check KGEI's competition here
EQT vs IMPP Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while IMPP trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check IMPP's competition here
EQT vs AMPY Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while AMPY trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check AMPY's competition here
EQT vs SJT Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 172.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SJT trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -185.50. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SJT's competition here
EQT vs PHX Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check PHX's competition here
EQT vs EPM Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while EPM trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -36.58. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EPM's competition here
EQT vs EPSN Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while EPSN trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EPSN's competition here
EQT vs ANNA Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while ANNA trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check ANNA's competition here
EQT vs EP Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while EP trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check EP's competition here
EQT vs SAFX Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while SAFX trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check SAFX's competition here
EQT vs HUSA Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check HUSA's competition here
EQT vs NRT Comparison June 2026
EQT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EQT stands at 33.6B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EQT is priced at $53.75, while NRT trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EQT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.20, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, EQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EQT is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EQT.Check NRT's competition here