
CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNX | $33.46 | -0.68% | 4.7B | 4.46 | $7.50 | N/A |
| COP | $115.58 | +1.40% | 140.8B | 19.58 | $5.90 | +2.82% |
| CNQ | $45.96 | +1.30% | 95.8B | 11.93 | $3.85 | +3.74% |
| EOG | $136.62 | +2.43% | 72.8B | 13.44 | $10.16 | +2.93% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $58.92 | +4.04% | 58.6B | 79.62 | $0.74 | +1.65% |
| FANG | $199.03 | +3.94% | 56B | 203.09 | $0.98 | +2.07% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $22.19 | +1.65% | 42.1B | 15.64 | $1.42 | +5.02% |
| OXY-WT | $37.01 | +6.95% | 36.8B | N/A | N/A | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
CNX vs COP Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while COP trades at $115.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check COP's competition here
CNX vs CNQ Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CNQ trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CNQ's competition here
CNX vs EOG Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EOG trades at $136.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EOG's competition here
CNX vs PXD Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check PXD's competition here
CNX vs OXY Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while OXY trades at $58.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 79.62. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check OXY's competition here
CNX vs FANG Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while FANG trades at $199.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 203.09. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check FANG's competition here
CNX vs HES Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check HES's competition here
CNX vs WDS Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while WDS trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check WDS's competition here
CNX vs OXY-WT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while OXY-WT trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check OXY-WT's competition here
CNX vs EQT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EQT trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EQT's competition here
CNX vs DVN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while DVN trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check DVN's competition here
CNX vs TPL Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while TPL trades at $368.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 50.66. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check TPL's competition here
CNX vs CTRA Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CTRA's competition here
CNX vs EXE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EXE trades at $92.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EXE's competition here
CNX vs COG Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check COG's competition here
CNX vs OVV Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while OVV trades at $58.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check OVV's competition here
CNX vs MRO Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check MRO's competition here
CNX vs PR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while PR trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check PR's competition here
CNX vs APA Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while APA trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check APA's competition here
CNX vs AR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while AR trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check AR's competition here
CNX vs CHK Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CHK's competition here
CNX vs CHKEW Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CHKEW's competition here
CNX vs RRC Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while RRC trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check RRC's competition here
CNX vs CHKEZ Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CHKEZ's competition here
CNX vs CHKEL Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CHKEL's competition here
CNX vs VIST Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while VIST trades at $76.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX and VIST have similar daily volatility (3.21).Check VIST's competition here
CNX vs SWN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SWN's competition here
CNX vs SM Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SM trades at $32.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SM's competition here
CNX vs CHRD Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CHRD trades at $138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -133.98. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CHRD's competition here
CNX vs MTDR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while MTDR trades at $56.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check MTDR's competition here
CNX vs CEO Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CEO's competition here
CNX vs CRC Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CRC trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CRC's competition here
CNX vs MUR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while MUR trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check MUR's competition here
CNX vs CPG Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CPG's competition here
CNX vs MGY Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while MGY trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check MGY's competition here
CNX vs OAS Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check OAS's competition here
CNX vs DEN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check DEN's competition here
CNX vs BCEI Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check BCEI's competition here
CNX vs CDEV Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CDEV's competition here
CNX vs ERF Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check ERF's competition here
CNX vs CRGY Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CRGY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CRGY's competition here
CNX vs CRK Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CRK trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CRK's competition here
CNX vs VRN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check VRN's competition here
CNX vs BTE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while BTE trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check BTE's competition here
CNX vs CLMT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CLMT trades at $35.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CLMT's competition here
CNX vs GPOR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while GPOR trades at $168.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check GPOR's competition here
CNX vs ESTE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check ESTE's competition here
CNX vs BKV Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while BKV trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check BKV's competition here
CNX vs BSM Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while BSM trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check BSM's competition here
CNX vs TALO Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while TALO trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check TALO's competition here
CNX vs CPE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CPE's competition here
CNX vs NOG Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while NOG trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check NOG's competition here
CNX vs CIVI Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check CIVI's competition here
CNX vs MNR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while MNR trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check MNR's competition here
CNX vs NEXT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while NEXT trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check NEXT's competition here
CNX vs STRDW Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check STRDW's competition here
CNX vs VET Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while VET trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check VET's competition here
CNX vs KRP Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while KRP trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check KRP's competition here
CNX vs HHRS Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check HHRS's competition here
CNX vs KOS Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while KOS trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check KOS's competition here
CNX vs DMLP Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while DMLP trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check DMLP's competition here
CNX vs FLMN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check FLMN's competition here
CNX vs SBR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SBR trades at $75.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SBR's competition here
CNX vs DEC Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while DEC trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check DEC's competition here
CNX vs IMPPP Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while IMPPP trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.88. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check IMPPP's competition here
CNX vs HPK Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 942.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while HPK trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check HPK's competition here
CNX vs SBOW Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SBOW's competition here
CNX vs TBN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 939.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while TBN trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check TBN's competition here
CNX vs TELL Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check TELL's competition here
CNX vs OBE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 778.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while OBE trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1157.00. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check OBE's competition here
CNX vs REPX Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 772.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while REPX trades at $35.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check REPX's competition here
CNX vs VTS Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 739.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while VTS trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -36.18. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check VTS's competition here
CNX vs TXO Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while TXO trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check TXO's competition here
CNX vs ROCC Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check ROCC's competition here
CNX vs VTLE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check VTLE's competition here
CNX vs GRNT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while GRNT trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check GRNT's competition here
CNX vs WTI Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while WTI trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check WTI's competition here
CNX vs GPRK Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 595M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while GPRK trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check GPRK's competition here
CNX vs PVAC Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check PVAC's competition here
CNX vs EGY Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 568.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EGY trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EGY's competition here
CNX vs SD Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SD trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SD's competition here
CNX vs GFR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while GFR trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -53.09. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check GFR's competition here
CNX vs GTE Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while GTE trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check GTE's competition here
CNX vs PNRG Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while PNRG trades at $182.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check PNRG's competition here
CNX vs REI Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 279.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while REI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check REI's competition here
CNX vs BRY Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check BRY's competition here
CNX vs INR Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while INR trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check INR's competition here
CNX vs IMPP Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while IMPP trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check IMPP's competition here
CNX vs AMPY Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while AMPY trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check AMPY's competition here
CNX vs KGEI Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while KGEI trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check KGEI's competition here
CNX vs SJT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 179.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SJT trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -192.50. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SJT's competition here
CNX vs PHX Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check PHX's competition here
CNX vs EPM Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EPM trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -35.75. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EPM's competition here
CNX vs EPSN Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EPSN trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EPSN's competition here
CNX vs ANNA Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while ANNA trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check ANNA's competition here
CNX vs SAFX Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while SAFX trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check SAFX's competition here
CNX vs EP Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while EP trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check EP's competition here
CNX vs GLND Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while GLND trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check GLND's competition here
CNX vs NRT Comparison June 2026
CNX plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNX stands at 4.7B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNX is priced at $33.46, while NRT trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNX currently has a P/E ratio of 4.46, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CNX's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CNX is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNX.Check NRT's competition here