Falcon Minerals Corporation (FLMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMN | $7.77 | +0.52% | 1.2B | 64.75 | $0.12 | +8.11% |
| COP | $117.57 | -1.24% | 145.3B | 20.24 | $5.89 | +2.77% |
| CNQ | $45.98 | -3.59% | 99.4B | 12.22 | $3.90 | +3.65% |
| EOG | $138.86 | -1.87% | 75B | 13.85 | $10.17 | +2.87% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $57.27 | -3.97% | 58.3B | 79.26 | $0.74 | +1.68% |
| FANG | $195.90 | -6.98% | 57.1B | 209.23 | $0.97 | +2.03% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $21.43 | -4.03% | 42.3B | 15.71 | $1.42 | +5.01% |
| OXY-WT | $35.32 | -6.11% | 36.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.68% |
Stock Comparison
FLMN vs COP Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while COP trades at $117.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check COP's competition here
FLMN vs CNQ Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CNQ trades at $45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CNQ's competition here
FLMN vs EOG Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EOG trades at $138.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EOG's competition here
FLMN vs PXD Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PXD's competition here
FLMN vs OXY Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OXY trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 79.26. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OXY's competition here
FLMN vs FANG Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while FANG trades at $195.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 209.23. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check FANG's competition here
FLMN vs HES Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HES's competition here
FLMN vs WDS Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while WDS trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check WDS's competition here
FLMN vs OXY-WT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OXY-WT trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OXY-WT's competition here
FLMN vs EQT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EQT trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EQT's competition here
FLMN vs DVN Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DVN trades at $44.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DVN's competition here
FLMN vs TPL Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TPL trades at $392.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 55.64. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TPL's competition here
FLMN vs CTRA Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CTRA's competition here
FLMN vs EXE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EXE trades at $92.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EXE's competition here
FLMN vs COG Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check COG's competition here
FLMN vs OVV Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OVV trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OVV's competition here
FLMN vs MRO Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MRO's competition here
FLMN vs PR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PR trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PR's competition here
FLMN vs APA Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while APA trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check APA's competition here
FLMN vs AR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while AR trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check AR's competition here
FLMN vs CHK Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHK's competition here
FLMN vs RRC Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while RRC trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check RRC's competition here
FLMN vs CHKEW Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHKEW's competition here
FLMN vs CHKEZ Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHKEZ's competition here
FLMN vs CHKEL Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHKEL's competition here
FLMN vs SM Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SM trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SM's competition here
FLMN vs VIST Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VIST trades at $74.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VIST's competition here
FLMN vs CHRD Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CHRD trades at $136.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -134.68. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CHRD's competition here
FLMN vs SWN Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SWN's competition here
FLMN vs MTDR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MTDR trades at $53.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MTDR's competition here
FLMN vs CEO Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CEO's competition here
FLMN vs MUR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MUR trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 67.80. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MUR's competition here
FLMN vs CRC Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CRC trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CRC's competition here
FLMN vs CPG Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CPG's competition here
FLMN vs MGY Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MGY trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MGY's competition here
FLMN vs CNX Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CNX trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN and CNX have similar daily volatility (1.99).Check CNX's competition here
FLMN vs OAS Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OAS's competition here
FLMN vs DEN Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DEN's competition here
FLMN vs BCEI Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BCEI's competition here
FLMN vs CDEV Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CDEV's competition here
FLMN vs ERF Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ERF's competition here
FLMN vs CRK Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CRK trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CRK's competition here
FLMN vs CRGY Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CRGY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CRGY's competition here
FLMN vs BTE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BTE trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BTE's competition here
FLMN vs VRN Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VRN's competition here
FLMN vs CLMT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CLMT trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CLMT's competition here
FLMN vs GPOR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GPOR trades at $170.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GPOR's competition here
FLMN vs ESTE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ESTE's competition here
FLMN vs BKV Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BKV trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BKV's competition here
FLMN vs BSM Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BSM trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BSM's competition here
FLMN vs TALO Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TALO trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TALO's competition here
FLMN vs CPE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CPE's competition here
FLMN vs CIVI Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check CIVI's competition here
FLMN vs NOG Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while NOG trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check NOG's competition here
FLMN vs MNR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while MNR trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check MNR's competition here
FLMN vs NEXT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while NEXT trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check NEXT's competition here
FLMN vs STRDW Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check STRDW's competition here
FLMN vs VET Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VET trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VET's competition here
FLMN vs KRP Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while KRP trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check KRP's competition here
FLMN vs KOS Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while KOS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check KOS's competition here
FLMN vs HHRS Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HHRS's competition here
FLMN vs DMLP Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DMLP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DMLP's competition here
FLMN vs SBR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SBR trades at $78.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SBR's competition here
FLMN vs HPK Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HPK trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HPK's competition here
FLMN vs DEC Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while DEC trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check DEC's competition here
FLMN vs TBN Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 999.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TBN trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -19.28. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TBN's competition here
FLMN vs IMPPP Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 965.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while IMPPP trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.54. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check IMPPP's competition here
FLMN vs SBOW Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SBOW's competition here
FLMN vs TELL Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TELL's competition here
FLMN vs OBE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while OBE trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1212.00. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check OBE's competition here
FLMN vs REPX Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 785.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while REPX trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check REPX's competition here
FLMN vs TXO Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 762.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while TXO trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check TXO's competition here
FLMN vs VTS Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VTS trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -36.29. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VTS's competition here
FLMN vs ROCC Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ROCC's competition here
FLMN vs VTLE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check VTLE's competition here
FLMN vs GRNT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 657.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GRNT trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GRNT's competition here
FLMN vs WTI Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while WTI trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check WTI's competition here
FLMN vs EGY Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 585.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EGY trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EGY's competition here
FLMN vs GPRK Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 583M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GPRK trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GPRK's competition here
FLMN vs PVAC Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PVAC's competition here
FLMN vs SD Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 578.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SD trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SD's competition here
FLMN vs GFR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 433.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GFR trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -54.41. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GFR's competition here
FLMN vs PNRG Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PNRG trades at $185.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PNRG's competition here
FLMN vs GTE Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while GTE trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check GTE's competition here
FLMN vs REI Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while REI trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check REI's competition here
FLMN vs BRY Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check BRY's competition here
FLMN vs INR Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while INR trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check INR's competition here
FLMN vs KGEI Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while KGEI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check KGEI's competition here
FLMN vs IMPP Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while IMPP trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check IMPP's competition here
FLMN vs AMPY Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while AMPY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check AMPY's competition here
FLMN vs SJT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SJT trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -195.00. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SJT's competition here
FLMN vs PHX Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check PHX's competition here
FLMN vs EPM Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EPM trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -37.83. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EPM's competition here
FLMN vs EPSN Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EPSN trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EPSN's competition here
FLMN vs ANNA Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while ANNA trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check ANNA's competition here
FLMN vs EP Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while EP trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check EP's competition here
FLMN vs SAFX Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while SAFX trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check SAFX's competition here
FLMN vs NRT Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while NRT trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check NRT's competition here
FLMN vs HUSA Comparison June 2026
FLMN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLMN stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLMN is priced at $7.77, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 64.75, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLMN's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLMN is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLMN.Check HUSA's competition here