SM Energy Company (SM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | $30.71 | -1.44% | 7.4B | 12.96 | $2.37 | +2.69% |
| COP | $113.98 | -0.88% | 138.9B | 19.32 | $5.90 | +2.90% |
| CNQ | $45.37 | -0.96% | 94.6B | 11.69 | $3.88 | +3.88% |
| EOG | $133.38 | -0.89% | 71.1B | 13.12 | $10.17 | +3.04% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $56.63 | -1.20% | 56.4B | 76.57 | $0.74 | +1.74% |
| FANG | $191.48 | -1.37% | 53.9B | 195.37 | $0.98 | +2.18% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $21.83 | +0.23% | 41.4B | 15.38 | $1.42 | +5.14% |
| OXY-WT | $34.60 | -1.31% | 34.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.74% |
Stock Comparison
SM vs COP Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while COP trades at $113.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check COP's competition here
SM vs CNQ Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CNQ trades at $45.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CNQ's competition here
SM vs EOG Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EOG trades at $133.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EOG's competition here
SM vs PXD Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check PXD's competition here
SM vs OXY Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while OXY trades at $56.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 76.57. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check OXY's competition here
SM vs FANG Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while FANG trades at $191.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 195.37. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check FANG's competition here
SM vs HES Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check HES's competition here
SM vs WDS Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while WDS trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check WDS's competition here
SM vs OXY-WT Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while OXY-WT trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check OXY-WT's competition here
SM vs EQT Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EQT trades at $54.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EQT's competition here
SM vs DVN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while DVN trades at $44.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check DVN's competition here
SM vs TPL Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while TPL trades at $393.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check TPL's competition here
SM vs CTRA Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CTRA's competition here
SM vs EXE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EXE trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EXE's competition here
SM vs COG Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check COG's competition here
SM vs MRO Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check MRO's competition here
SM vs OVV Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while OVV trades at $56.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check OVV's competition here
SM vs PR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while PR trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check PR's competition here
SM vs APA Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while APA trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check APA's competition here
SM vs AR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while AR trades at $35.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check AR's competition here
SM vs CHK Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CHK's competition here
SM vs CHKEW Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CHKEW's competition here
SM vs RRC Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while RRC trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check RRC's competition here
SM vs CHKEZ Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CHKEZ's competition here
SM vs CHKEL Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CHKEL's competition here
SM vs SWN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check SWN's competition here
SM vs VIST Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while VIST trades at $74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check VIST's competition here
SM vs CHRD Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CHRD trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -128.17. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CHRD's competition here
SM vs MTDR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while MTDR trades at $53.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check MTDR's competition here
SM vs CEO Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CEO's competition here
SM vs CPG Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CPG's competition here
SM vs CRC Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CRC trades at $59.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CRC's competition here
SM vs MUR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while MUR trades at $36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 61.35. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check MUR's competition here
SM vs MGY Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while MGY trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check MGY's competition here
SM vs CNX Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CNX trades at $33.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CNX's competition here
SM vs OAS Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check OAS's competition here
SM vs DEN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check DEN's competition here
SM vs BCEI Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check BCEI's competition here
SM vs CDEV Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CDEV's competition here
SM vs ERF Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check ERF's competition here
SM vs CRK Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CRK trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CRK's competition here
SM vs CRGY Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CRGY trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CRGY's competition here
SM vs VRN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check VRN's competition here
SM vs BTE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while BTE trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check BTE's competition here
SM vs CLMT Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CLMT trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CLMT's competition here
SM vs GPOR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while GPOR trades at $168.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check GPOR's competition here
SM vs ESTE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check ESTE's competition here
SM vs BKV Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while BKV trades at $26.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check BKV's competition here
SM vs BSM Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while BSM trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check BSM's competition here
SM vs TALO Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while TALO trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check TALO's competition here
SM vs CPE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CPE's competition here
SM vs CIVI Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check CIVI's competition here
SM vs NOG Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while NOG trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check NOG's competition here
SM vs MNR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while MNR trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check MNR's competition here
SM vs NEXT Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while NEXT trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check NEXT's competition here
SM vs STRDW Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check STRDW's competition here
SM vs VET Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while VET trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check VET's competition here
SM vs KRP Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while KRP trades at $15.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check KRP's competition here
SM vs HHRS Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check HHRS's competition here
SM vs KOS Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while KOS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check KOS's competition here
SM vs DMLP Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while DMLP trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check DMLP's competition here
SM vs FLMN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check FLMN's competition here
SM vs SBR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while SBR trades at $74.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check SBR's competition here
SM vs DEC Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while DEC trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check DEC's competition here
SM vs TBN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 954.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while TBN trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check TBN's competition here
SM vs SBOW Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check SBOW's competition here
SM vs HPK Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while HPK trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check HPK's competition here
SM vs TELL Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check TELL's competition here
SM vs IMPPP Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 884.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while IMPPP trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.38. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check IMPPP's competition here
SM vs OBE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 737.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while OBE trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1096.00. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check OBE's competition here
SM vs REPX Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 721.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while REPX trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check REPX's competition here
SM vs VTS Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 720.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while VTS trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -35.27. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check VTS's competition here
SM vs ROCC Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check ROCC's competition here
SM vs TXO Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 703.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while TXO trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check TXO's competition here
SM vs VTLE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check VTLE's competition here
SM vs GRNT Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 641.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while GRNT trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -19.46. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check GRNT's competition here
SM vs PVAC Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check PVAC's competition here
SM vs WTI Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 549M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while WTI trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check WTI's competition here
SM vs EGY Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 545.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EGY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EGY's competition here
SM vs SD Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 542M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while SD trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check SD's competition here
SM vs GPRK Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 536.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while GPRK trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check GPRK's competition here
SM vs GFR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while GFR trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -51.36. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check GFR's competition here
SM vs GTE Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 274.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while GTE trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check GTE's competition here
SM vs REI Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while REI trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check REI's competition here
SM vs PNRG Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 266.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while PNRG trades at $164.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check PNRG's competition here
SM vs BRY Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check BRY's competition here
SM vs INR Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 208.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while INR trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check INR's competition here
SM vs IMPP Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 192.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while IMPP trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check IMPP's competition here
SM vs AMPY Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while AMPY trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check AMPY's competition here
SM vs KGEI Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while KGEI trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check KGEI's competition here
SM vs SJT Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while SJT trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -193.00. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check SJT's competition here
SM vs PHX Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check PHX's competition here
SM vs EPM Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EPM trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -35.42. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EPM's competition here
SM vs EPSN Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EPSN trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EPSN's competition here
SM vs ANNA Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while ANNA trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check ANNA's competition here
SM vs SAFX Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while SAFX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check SAFX's competition here
SM vs EP Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while EP trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check EP's competition here
SM vs GLND Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, GLND has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while GLND trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas GLND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to GLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check GLND's competition here
SM vs HUSA Comparison June 2026
SM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SM stands at 7.4B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SM is priced at $30.71, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SM currently has a P/E ratio of 12.96, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SM is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SM.Check HUSA's competition here