Plexus Corp. (PLXS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 260.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SNDK trades at $1,759.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SNDK's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 180.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while APH trades at $146.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check APH's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while GLW trades at $197.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 95.17. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check GLW's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while COHR trades at $421.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 201.78. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check COHR's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while TEL trades at $220.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check TEL's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while KEYS trades at $343.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 55.34. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check KEYS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while FLEX trades at $159.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 68.46. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check FLEX's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while CLS trades at $425.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 51.41. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check CLS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while GRMN trades at $241.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check GRMN's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while JBL trades at $373.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 50.39. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check JBL's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check IIVI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while TDY trades at $618.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check TDY's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while FN trades at $714.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check FN's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MKSI trades at $330.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 68.94. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MKSI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while TTMI trades at $184.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 100.46. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check TTMI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check WDCVV's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SANM trades at $280.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 59.48. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SANM's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while VICR trades at $306.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 102.38. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check VICR's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while TRMB trades at $55.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check TRMB's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while LFUS trades at $480.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -289.30. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check LFUS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while CGNX trades at $64.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 76.08. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check CGNX's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ST trades at $52.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 159.59. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ST's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ESE trades at $291.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.36. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ESE's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while NOVT trades at $165.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 118.76. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check NOVT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MDA trades at $41.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 70.84. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MDA's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OLED trades at $90.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OLED's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while VNT trades at $28.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check VNT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while BMI trades at $127.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check BMI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while PENG trades at $71.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 101.59. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check PENG's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ITRI trades at $81.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ITRI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OSIS trades at $212.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OSIS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while BELFB trades at $276.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 66.48. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check BELFB's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while BHE trades at $88.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 94.13. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check BHE's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while BELFA trades at $246.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check BELFA's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OUST trades at $47.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -50.61. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OUST's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ROG trades at $145.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -47.64. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ROG's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while NOVTU trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check NOVTU's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while CTS trades at $66.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check CTS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while VPG trades at $128.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 284.29. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check VPG's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ALNT trades at $89.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ALNT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while BKSY trades at $39.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check BKSY's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SATL trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SATL's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 949.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while DAKT trades at $19.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check DAKT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 948.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while KODK trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check KODK's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check FARO's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 843.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while LPTH trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -35.24. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check LPTH's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 721.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while LYTS trades at $23.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check LYTS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 602.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MLAB trades at $109.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 90.19. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS and MLAB have similar daily volatility (5.70).Check MLAB's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check AMOT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 529.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OPTX trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -164.25. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OPTX's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OUST-WT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MEI trades at $12.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MEI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 443.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SATLW trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SATLW's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SLNHP trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SLNHP's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check VLDR's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MPTI trades at $92.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MPTI's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while RELL trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 63.78. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check RELL's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SLNH trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SLNH's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while KULR trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check KULR's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check EMAN's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MVIS trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MVIS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while CPSH trades at $7.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 259.33. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check CPSH's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while USBC trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check USBC's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OPTXW trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OPTXW's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while GNSS trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check GNSS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SOTK trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SOTK's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while LINK trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check LINK's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while WRAP trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check WRAP's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ODYS trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ODYS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ELTK trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ELTK's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MIND trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 76.11. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MIND's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while DSWL trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check DSWL's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while UEIC trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check UEIC's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while NSYS trades at $16.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check NSYS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ACFN trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ACFN's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while WATT trades at $28.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check WATT's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while LUNA trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -38.33. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check LUNA's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while LGL trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 702.00. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check LGL's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while DAIO trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check DAIO's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ISNS's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while AMPGZ trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check AMPGZ's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while NEON trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check NEON's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while WBX trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check WBX's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while AMPGR trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check AMPGR's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while ELSE trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check ELSE's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while REFR trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check REFR's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while HOLO trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check HOLO's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check TMPOW's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SGMA's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check VIAO's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SELX trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SELX's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check KNW's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while MTEK trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check MTEK's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while GAUZ trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check GAUZ's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SVRE trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SVRE's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check OST's competition here

PLXS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PLXS stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PLXS is priced at $284.35, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PLXS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.63, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLXS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PLXS is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLXS.Check SVREW's competition here