Fabrinet (FN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 260.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SNDK trades at $1,761.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 60.08. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SNDK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 180B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while APH trades at $146.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check APH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while GLW trades at $176.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 84.93. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GLW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while TEL trades at $211.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TEL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while COHR trades at $362.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 172.80. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check COHR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while KEYS trades at $330.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KEYS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while FLEX trades at $148.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 63.80. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FLEX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while CLS trades at $426.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 51.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CLS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while GRMN trades at $236.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GRMN's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while JBL trades at $359.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 48.39. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check JBL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IIVI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while TDY trades at $609.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TDY's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MKSI trades at $317.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 66.59. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MKSI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while TTMI trades at $172.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 93.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TTMI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WDCVV's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while VICR trades at $328.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 110.35. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VICR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SANM trades at $264.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SANM's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while TRMB trades at $58.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TRMB's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while LFUS trades at $463.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -275.87. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LFUS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while CGNX trades at $64.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 76.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CGNX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ESE trades at $287.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 56.62. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ESE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while PLXS trades at $271.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PLXS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ST trades at $49.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 149.27. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ST's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MDA trades at $42.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 72.95. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MDA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while NOVT trades at $163.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 117.60. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OLED trades at $95.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OLED's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while VNT trades at $28.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VNT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ITRI trades at $84.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ITRI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while BMI trades at $122.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BMI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OSIS trades at $213.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OSIS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while BELFB trades at $269.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 65.03. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFB's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while PENG trades at $59.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 85.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PENG's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while BHE trades at $85.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 90.55. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BHE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while BELFA trades at $239.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 57.65. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OUST trades at $44.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -48.31. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ROG trades at $147.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -47.96. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ROG's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while NOVTU trades at $69.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVTU's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while CTS trades at $63.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CTS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while VPG trades at $126.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 280.76. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VPG's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while BKSY trades at $42.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BKSY's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ALNT trades at $83.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ALNT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SATL trades at $8.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SATL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 991M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while DAKT trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAKT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 953.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while KODK trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KODK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FARO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while LYTS trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LYTS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while LPTH trades at $16.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -33.11. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LPTH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MLAB trades at $105.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 86.99. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MLAB's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMOT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 436.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OPTX trades at $10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -135.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SATLW trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SATLW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MEI trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MEI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 384.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 306.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SLNHP trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNHP's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VLDR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MPTI trades at $92.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MPTI's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 263.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SLNH trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while RELL trades at $16.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 62.19. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RELL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 213.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while KULR trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KULR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MVIS trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MVIS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check EMAN's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while CPSH trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 315.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CPSH's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while USBC trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check USBC's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while GNSS trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GNSS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SOTK trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SOTK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while LINK trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -56.22. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LINK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while WRAP trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WRAP's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ODYS trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ODYS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ELTK trades at $9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELTK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OPTXW trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTXW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MIND trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 71.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MIND's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while DSWL trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DSWL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while UEIC trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check UEIC's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while NSYS trades at $17.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 46.16. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NSYS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while WATT trades at $29.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WATT's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ACFN trades at $17.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ACFN's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while DAIO trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAIO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while LUNA trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LUNA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while LGL trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 709.16. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LGL's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ISNS's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while WBX trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WBX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while HOLO trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check HOLO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while NEON trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NEON's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while ELSE trades at $7.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 95.88. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELSE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while REFR trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check REFR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TMPOW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while AMPGR trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMPGR's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while AMPGZ trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMPGZ's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SGMA's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VIAO's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KNW's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while GAUZ trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GAUZ's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SVRE trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVRE's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while MTEK trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MTEK's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OST's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SELX trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SELX's competition here

FN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $622.36, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 53.45, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVREW's competition here