Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | $484.65 | -0.67% | 12.3B | -288.48 | -$1.68 | +0.62% |
| SNDK | $1,831.50 | +6.71% | 271.2B | 62.64 | $29.24 | N/A |
| APH | $147.62 | -0.53% | 181.8B | 42.46 | $3.48 | +0.56% |
| GLW | $200.76 | +0.18% | 172.8B | 96.52 | $2.08 | +0.56% |
| COHR | $417.43 | -2.22% | 66.3B | 199.05 | $2.10 | N/A |
| TEL | $218.39 | +1.70% | 63.7B | 22.28 | $9.80 | +1.34% |
| KEYS | $350.48 | +1.13% | 60.1B | 56.53 | $6.20 | N/A |
| FLEX | $161.94 | +1.57% | 59.3B | 69.50 | $2.33 | N/A |
| CLS | $458.14 | -3.02% | 52.7B | 55.42 | $8.27 | N/A |
| GRMN | $237.94 | -1.28% | 45.9B | 26.57 | $8.95 | +1.52% |
Stock Comparison
LFUS vs SNDK Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 271.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SNDK trades at $1,831.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 62.64. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SNDK's competition here
LFUS vs APH Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 181.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while APH trades at $147.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check APH's competition here
LFUS vs GLW Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while GLW trades at $200.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 96.52. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GLW's competition here
LFUS vs COHR Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while COHR trades at $417.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 199.05. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check COHR's competition here
LFUS vs TEL Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while TEL trades at $218.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TEL's competition here
LFUS vs KEYS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while KEYS trades at $350.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 56.53. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KEYS's competition here
LFUS vs FLEX Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while FLEX trades at $161.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FLEX's competition here
LFUS vs CLS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while CLS trades at $458.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 55.42. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CLS's competition here
LFUS vs GRMN Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while GRMN trades at $237.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GRMN's competition here
LFUS vs JBL Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while JBL trades at $379.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 51.08. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check JBL's competition here
LFUS vs IIVI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check IIVI's competition here
LFUS vs TDY Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while TDY trades at $618.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TDY's competition here
LFUS vs FN Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while FN trades at $725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 62.27. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FN's competition here
LFUS vs MKSI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MKSI trades at $335.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 70.41. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MKSI's competition here
LFUS vs TTMI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while TTMI trades at $189.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 102.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TTMI's competition here
LFUS vs WDCVV Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WDCVV's competition here
LFUS vs SANM Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SANM trades at $282.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 60.03. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SANM's competition here
LFUS vs VICR Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while VICR trades at $330.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 110.53. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VICR's competition here
LFUS vs TRMB Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while TRMB trades at $55.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TRMB's competition here
LFUS vs CGNX Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while CGNX trades at $66.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 77.72. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CGNX's competition here
LFUS vs ST Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ST trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 162.27. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ST's competition here
LFUS vs PLXS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while PLXS trades at $287.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check PLXS's competition here
LFUS vs ESE Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ESE trades at $295.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 58.06. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ESE's competition here
LFUS vs NOVT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while NOVT trades at $166.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 120.10. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NOVT's competition here
LFUS vs MDA Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MDA trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MDA's competition here
LFUS vs OLED Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OLED trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OLED's competition here
LFUS vs VNT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while VNT trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VNT's competition here
LFUS vs BMI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while BMI trades at $129.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BMI's competition here
LFUS vs PENG Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while PENG trades at $71.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 102.01. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check PENG's competition here
LFUS vs ITRI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ITRI trades at $82.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ITRI's competition here
LFUS vs OSIS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OSIS trades at $213.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OSIS's competition here
LFUS vs BELFB Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while BELFB trades at $280.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 67.33. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BELFB's competition here
LFUS vs BHE Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while BHE trades at $88.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 93.97. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BHE's competition here
LFUS vs BELFA Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while BELFA trades at $248.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BELFA's competition here
LFUS vs OUST Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OUST trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -47.27. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OUST's competition here
LFUS vs ROG Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ROG trades at $148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -48.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ROG's competition here
LFUS vs NOVTU Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while NOVTU trades at $70.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NOVTU's competition here
LFUS vs CTS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while CTS trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CTS's competition here
LFUS vs VPG Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while VPG trades at $129.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 288.62. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VPG's competition here
LFUS vs ALNT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ALNT trades at $86.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 60.69. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ALNT's competition here
LFUS vs BKSY Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while BKSY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BKSY's competition here
LFUS vs KODK Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 958.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while KODK trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KODK's competition here
LFUS vs DAKT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 947.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while DAKT trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check DAKT's competition here
LFUS vs SATL Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 942M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SATL trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SATL's competition here
LFUS vs FARO Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check FARO's competition here
LFUS vs LPTH Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 747.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while LPTH trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -31.24. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LPTH's competition here
LFUS vs LYTS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 711.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while LYTS trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LYTS's competition here
LFUS vs OUST-WTA Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
LFUS vs MLAB Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 576.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MLAB trades at $104.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 86.26. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MLAB's competition here
LFUS vs AMOT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check AMOT's competition here
LFUS vs BKSY-WT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 525.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
LFUS vs OPTX Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 508.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OPTX trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -157.87. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OPTX's competition here
LFUS vs MEI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 467.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MEI trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MEI's competition here
LFUS vs OUST-WT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
LFUS vs SATLW Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SATLW trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SATLW's competition here
LFUS vs SLNHP Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 316.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SLNHP trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SLNHP's competition here
LFUS vs VLDR Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VLDR's competition here
LFUS vs MPTI Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MPTI trades at $90.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MPTI's competition here
LFUS vs SLNH Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SLNH trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SLNH's competition here
LFUS vs RELL Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 238.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while RELL trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 61.07. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check RELL's competition here
LFUS vs KULR Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while KULR trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KULR's competition here
LFUS vs EMAN Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check EMAN's competition here
LFUS vs MVIS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MVIS trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MVIS's competition here
LFUS vs CPSH Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while CPSH trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 262.00. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check CPSH's competition here
LFUS vs USBC Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while USBC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check USBC's competition here
LFUS vs GNSS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while GNSS trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GNSS's competition here
LFUS vs SOTK Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SOTK trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 47.73. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SOTK's competition here
LFUS vs OPTXW Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 79.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OPTXW trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OPTXW's competition here
LFUS vs LINK Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while LINK trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -55.44. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LINK's competition here
LFUS vs WRAP Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while WRAP trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WRAP's competition here
LFUS vs ODYS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ODYS trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ODYS's competition here
LFUS vs ELTK Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ELTK trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -21.53. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ELTK's competition here
LFUS vs MIND Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MIND trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 75.11. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MIND's competition here
LFUS vs DSWL Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while DSWL trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check DSWL's competition here
LFUS vs UEIC Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while UEIC trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check UEIC's competition here
LFUS vs NSYS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while NSYS trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NSYS's competition here
LFUS vs WATT Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while WATT trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WATT's competition here
LFUS vs ACFN Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ACFN trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ACFN's competition here
LFUS vs LUNA Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while LUNA trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -38.33. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LUNA's competition here
LFUS vs DAIO Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while DAIO trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check DAIO's competition here
LFUS vs LGL Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while LGL trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 705.00. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check LGL's competition here
LFUS vs ISNS Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ISNS's competition here
LFUS vs NEON Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while NEON trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check NEON's competition here
LFUS vs WBX Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while WBX trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check WBX's competition here
LFUS vs ELSE Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while ELSE trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 95.88. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check ELSE's competition here
LFUS vs REFR Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while REFR trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check REFR's competition here
LFUS vs HOLO Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while HOLO trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check HOLO's competition here
LFUS vs TMPOW Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check TMPOW's competition here
LFUS vs AMPGZ Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while AMPGZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check AMPGZ's competition here
LFUS vs AMPGR Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while AMPGR trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check AMPGR's competition here
LFUS vs SGMA Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SGMA's competition here
LFUS vs SELX Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SELX trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SELX's competition here
LFUS vs VIAO Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check VIAO's competition here
LFUS vs KNW Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check KNW's competition here
LFUS vs GAUZ Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while GAUZ trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check GAUZ's competition here
LFUS vs MTEK Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while MTEK trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check MTEK's competition here
LFUS vs SVRE Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SVRE trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SVRE's competition here
LFUS vs OST Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check OST's competition here
LFUS vs SVREW Comparison June 2026
LFUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFUS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFUS is priced at $484.65, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFUS currently has a P/E ratio of -288.48, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFUS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LFUS is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFUS.Check SVREW's competition here