Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 207.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $82.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check APH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $149.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GLW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $356.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check KEYS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $277.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 60.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check COHR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $291.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GRMN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $111.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FLEX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while CLS trades at $353.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CLS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check IIVI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $609.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TDY's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $253.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MKSI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WDCVV's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while FTV trades at $55.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FTV's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while FN trades at $404.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $57.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TRMB's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $120.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TTMI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $273.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 94.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VICR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $219.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SANM's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $273.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AEIS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $427.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LFUS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $58.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CGNX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check RAL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $261.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check PLXS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $266.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ESE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $41.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ST's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $140.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NOVT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $30.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VNT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $87.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ITRI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $75.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OLED's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $194.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OSIS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $36.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check KN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $245.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BELFB's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $197.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BELFA's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $81.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BHE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $135.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ROG's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $60.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NOVTU's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $59.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CTS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while UMAC trades at $24.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -150.44. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check UMAC's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $68.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 162.82. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VPG's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FARO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 821.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check DAKT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 626.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LPTH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AMOT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MEI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is -26.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OPTXW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 329.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $11.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SLNHP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VLDR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -68.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OPTX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $73.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MPTI's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $17.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 56.52. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check RELL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check USBC's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SLNH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check EMAN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -32.66. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LINK's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WRAP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WBX's ROE of -13.28%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WBX's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while CPSH trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 5500.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check CPSH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ELTK's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 61.27. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ACFN's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ODYS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check DSWL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -16.71. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MIND's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MIND's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 586.15. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LGL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LGL's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MVIS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ISNS's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check DAIO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check REFR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AMPGR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check ELSE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TMPOW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SGMA's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VIAO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check KNW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check NEON's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while INHD trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check INHD's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check WETH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OST's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SVREW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SVRE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check BNSO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MINDP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MINDP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check GAUZ's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MMAT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check IMTE's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 912K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FCUV's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 298K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check SOBR's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUSTZ's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check OUSTW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, IIVIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while IIVIP trades at $187.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas IIVIP's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IIVIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to IIVIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check IIVIP's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while HTCH trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check HTCH's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MOCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while MOCO trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas MOCO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MOCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to MOCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check MOCO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, TMPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while TMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas TMPO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TMPO's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to TMPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check TMPO's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, QNGY-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while QNGY-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas QNGY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to QNGY-WT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to QNGY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check QNGY-WT's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FEIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while FEIC trades at $106.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas FEIC's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FEIC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to FEIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check FEIC's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, VLDRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is less volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check VLDRW's competition here

Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, JBL stands at 33.2B. In comparison, QNGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JBL is priced at $313.51 on the NYSE, while QNGY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

JBL currently has a P/E ratio of 26.41, whereas QNGY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JBL's ROE is +0.62%, compared to QNGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, JBL is more volatile compared to QNGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JBL.Check QNGY's competition here