CTS Corporation (CTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS | $62.18 | -7.25% | 1.9B | 28.33 | $2.34 | +0.24% |
| SNDK | $1,524.83 | -16.74% | 260.6B | 60.18 | $29.24 | N/A |
| APH | $138.55 | -6.14% | 180.6B | 42.18 | $3.48 | +0.57% |
| GLW | $175.04 | -12.81% | 170.4B | 95.17 | $2.08 | +0.57% |
| COHR | $377.47 | -9.57% | 66.9B | 201.78 | $2.09 | N/A |
| TEL | $212.53 | -2.68% | 64.5B | 22.56 | $9.79 | +1.32% |
| KEYS | $328.76 | -6.20% | 58.8B | 55.34 | $6.20 | N/A |
| FLEX | $150.04 | -7.35% | 58.4B | 68.46 | $2.33 | N/A |
| CLS | $368.05 | -19.66% | 48.9B | 51.41 | $8.27 | N/A |
| GRMN | $237.88 | -0.03% | 46.7B | 26.97 | $8.97 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
CTS vs SNDK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 260.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SNDK trades at $1,524.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SNDK's competition here
CTS vs APH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 180.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while APH trades at $138.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check APH's competition here
CTS vs GLW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while GLW trades at $175.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 95.17. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GLW's competition here
CTS vs COHR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while COHR trades at $377.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 201.78. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check COHR's competition here
CTS vs TEL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while TEL trades at $212.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TEL's competition here
CTS vs KEYS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while KEYS trades at $328.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 55.34. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KEYS's competition here
CTS vs FLEX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while FLEX trades at $150.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 68.46. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check FLEX's competition here
CTS vs CLS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while CLS trades at $368.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 51.41. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check CLS's competition here
CTS vs GRMN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while GRMN trades at $237.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GRMN's competition here
CTS vs JBL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while JBL trades at $350.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 50.39. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check JBL's competition here
CTS vs IIVI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check IIVI's competition here
CTS vs TDY Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while TDY trades at $601.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TDY's competition here
CTS vs FN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while FN trades at $624.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check FN's competition here
CTS vs MKSI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MKSI trades at $301.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 68.94. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MKSI's competition here
CTS vs TTMI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while TTMI trades at $166.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 100.46. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TTMI's competition here
CTS vs WDCVV Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WDCVV's competition here
CTS vs SANM Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SANM trades at $253.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 59.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SANM's competition here
CTS vs VICR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while VICR trades at $266.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 102.38. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VICR's competition here
CTS vs TRMB Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while TRMB trades at $54.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TRMB's competition here
CTS vs LFUS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while LFUS trades at $459.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -289.30. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LFUS's competition here
CTS vs CGNX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while CGNX trades at $60.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 76.08. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check CGNX's competition here
CTS vs ST Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ST trades at $49.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 159.59. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ST's competition here
CTS vs PLXS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while PLXS trades at $272.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check PLXS's competition here
CTS vs ESE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ESE trades at $292.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.36. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ESE's competition here
CTS vs NOVT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while NOVT trades at $156.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 118.76. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NOVT's competition here
CTS vs MDA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MDA trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 70.84. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MDA's competition here
CTS vs OLED Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OLED trades at $86.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OLED's competition here
CTS vs VNT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while VNT trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VNT's competition here
CTS vs BMI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while BMI trades at $127.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BMI's competition here
CTS vs PENG Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while PENG trades at $59.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 101.59. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check PENG's competition here
CTS vs ITRI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ITRI trades at $79.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ITRI's competition here
CTS vs OSIS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OSIS trades at $200.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OSIS's competition here
CTS vs BELFB Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while BELFB trades at $261.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 66.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BELFB's competition here
CTS vs BHE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while BHE trades at $83.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 94.13. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BHE's competition here
CTS vs BELFA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while BELFA trades at $232.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BELFA's competition here
CTS vs OUST Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OUST trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -50.61. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OUST's competition here
CTS vs ROG Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ROG trades at $138.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -47.64. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ROG's competition here
CTS vs NOVTU Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while NOVTU trades at $66.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NOVTU's competition here
CTS vs VPG Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while VPG trades at $115.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 284.29. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VPG's competition here
CTS vs ALNT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ALNT trades at $83.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ALNT's competition here
CTS vs BKSY Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while BKSY trades at $34.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BKSY's competition here
CTS vs SATL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 978.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SATL trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SATL's competition here
CTS vs DAKT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 949.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while DAKT trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check DAKT's competition here
CTS vs KODK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 948.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while KODK trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KODK's competition here
CTS vs FARO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check FARO's competition here
CTS vs LPTH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 843.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while LPTH trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -35.24. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LPTH's competition here
CTS vs LYTS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 721.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while LYTS trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LYTS's competition here
CTS vs OUST-WTA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
CTS vs MLAB Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 602.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MLAB trades at $106.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 90.19. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MLAB's competition here
CTS vs AMOT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check AMOT's competition here
CTS vs OPTX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 529.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OPTX trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -164.25. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OPTX's competition here
CTS vs OUST-WT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
CTS vs MEI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MEI trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MEI's competition here
CTS vs BKSY-WT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 443.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
CTS vs SATLW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SATLW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SATLW's competition here
CTS vs SLNHP Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SLNHP trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SLNHP's competition here
CTS vs VLDR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VLDR's competition here
CTS vs MPTI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MPTI trades at $89.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MPTI's competition here
CTS vs RELL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 249.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while RELL trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 63.78. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check RELL's competition here
CTS vs SLNH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SLNH trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SLNH's competition here
CTS vs KULR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while KULR trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KULR's competition here
CTS vs EMAN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check EMAN's competition here
CTS vs MVIS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MVIS trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MVIS's competition here
CTS vs CPSH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while CPSH trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 259.33. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check CPSH's competition here
CTS vs USBC Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while USBC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check USBC's competition here
CTS vs OPTXW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OPTXW trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OPTXW's competition here
CTS vs GNSS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while GNSS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GNSS's competition here
CTS vs SOTK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SOTK trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SOTK's competition here
CTS vs LINK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while LINK trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LINK's competition here
CTS vs WRAP Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while WRAP trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WRAP's competition here
CTS vs ODYS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ODYS trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ODYS's competition here
CTS vs ELTK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ELTK trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -21.07. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ELTK's competition here
CTS vs MIND Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MIND trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 76.11. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MIND's competition here
CTS vs DSWL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while DSWL trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check DSWL's competition here
CTS vs UEIC Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while UEIC trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check UEIC's competition here
CTS vs NSYS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while NSYS trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NSYS's competition here
CTS vs ACFN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ACFN trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ACFN's competition here
CTS vs WATT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while WATT trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WATT's competition here
CTS vs LUNA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while LUNA trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -38.33. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LUNA's competition here
CTS vs LGL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while LGL trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 702.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LGL's competition here
CTS vs DAIO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while DAIO trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check DAIO's competition here
CTS vs ISNS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ISNS's competition here
CTS vs AMPGZ Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while AMPGZ trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check AMPGZ's competition here
CTS vs NEON Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while NEON trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NEON's competition here
CTS vs WBX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while WBX trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WBX's competition here
CTS vs AMPGR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while AMPGR trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check AMPGR's competition here
CTS vs ELSE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while ELSE trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ELSE's competition here
CTS vs REFR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while REFR trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check REFR's competition here
CTS vs HOLO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while HOLO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check HOLO's competition here
CTS vs TMPOW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TMPOW's competition here
CTS vs SGMA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SGMA's competition here
CTS vs VIAO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VIAO's competition here
CTS vs SELX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SELX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SELX's competition here
CTS vs KNW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KNW's competition here
CTS vs MTEK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while MTEK trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MTEK's competition here
CTS vs GAUZ Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while GAUZ trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GAUZ's competition here
CTS vs SVRE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SVRE trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SVRE's competition here
CTS vs OST Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OST's competition here
CTS vs SVREW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $62.18, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SVREW's competition here