GMS Inc. (GMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | $109.96 | +0.00% | 4.2B | 41.81 | $2.63 | N/A |
| TT | $448.47 | -0.63% | 99.2B | 34.27 | $13.09 | +0.86% |
| LII | $496.77 | -1.07% | 17.3B | 22.06 | $22.50 | +1.04% |
| CSL | $338.75 | -1.76% | 13.7B | 19.77 | $17.14 | +1.31% |
| AAON | $138.66 | -1.10% | 11.4B | 97.65 | $1.42 | +0.29% |
| WMS | $135.65 | -2.52% | 10.4B | 24.84 | $5.46 | +0.55% |
| OC | $122.62 | -2.54% | 9.9B | -25.87 | -$4.74 | +2.42% |
| BLDR | $75.62 | -0.84% | 8.1B | 28.87 | $2.62 | N/A |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GMS vs TT Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while TT trades at $448.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check TT's competition here
GMS vs LII Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while LII trades at $496.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check LII's competition here
GMS vs CSL Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while CSL trades at $338.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check CSL's competition here
GMS vs AAON Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while AAON trades at $138.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 97.65. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check AAON's competition here
GMS vs WMS Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while WMS trades at $135.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check WMS's competition here
GMS vs OC Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while OC trades at $122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -25.87. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check OC's competition here
GMS vs BLDR Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while BLDR trades at $75.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check BLDR's competition here
GMS vs FBHS Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check FBHS's competition here
GMS vs AZEK Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check AZEK's competition here
GMS vs BECN Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check BECN's competition here
GMS vs SSD Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while SSD trades at $187.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check SSD's competition here
GMS vs AWI Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while AWI trades at $155.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check AWI's competition here
GMS vs FBIN Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while FBIN trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check FBIN's competition here
GMS vs TREX Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while TREX trades at $41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check TREX's competition here
GMS vs DOOR Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check DOOR's competition here
GMS vs PGTI Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check PGTI's competition here
GMS vs ROCK Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while ROCK trades at $37.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check ROCK's competition here
GMS vs NX Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 835.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while NX trades at $18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check NX's competition here
GMS vs APOG Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 821.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while APOG trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check APOG's competition here
GMS vs JBI Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 716.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while JBI trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check JBI's competition here
GMS vs SWIM Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while SWIM trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check SWIM's competition here
GMS vs ASPN Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 515.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while ASPN trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check ASPN's competition here
GMS vs BXC Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 393.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while BXC trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -103.14. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check BXC's competition here
GMS vs PHOE Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 320.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while PHOE trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 494.33. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check PHOE's competition here
GMS vs PPIH Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 252.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while PPIH trades at $31.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check PPIH's competition here
GMS vs JELD Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while JELD trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check JELD's competition here
GMS vs SMJF Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while SMJF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 160.43. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check SMJF's competition here
GMS vs CSTE Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while CSTE trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check CSTE's competition here
GMS vs APT Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while APT trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check APT's competition here
GMS vs ILAG Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while ILAG trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check ILAG's competition here
GMS vs VIEW Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check VIEW's competition here
GMS vs AEHL Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 649.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while AEHL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check AEHL's competition here
GMS vs VIEWW Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check VIEWW's competition here
GMS vs FRTA Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check FRTA's competition here
GMS vs AFI Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check AFI's competition here
GMS vs LAYN Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check LAYN's competition here
GMS vs HW Comparison June 2026
GMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMS stands at 4.2B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GMS is priced at $109.96, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.81, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GMS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMS is less volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMS.Check HW's competition here