Forterra, Inc. (FRTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRTA | $24.00 | +0.00% | 0 | 14.37 | $1.67 | N/A |
| TT | $458.92 | +2.33% | 101.5B | 35.07 | $13.09 | +0.85% |
| LII | $516.37 | +3.95% | 18B | 22.95 | $22.50 | +1.01% |
| CSL | $344.24 | +1.62% | 13.9B | 20.08 | $17.14 | +1.28% |
| AAON | $143.50 | +3.49% | 11.8B | 101.06 | $1.42 | +0.28% |
| WMS | $135.66 | +0.01% | 10.4B | 24.88 | $5.45 | +0.54% |
| OC | $120.41 | -1.80% | 9.7B | -25.41 | -$4.74 | +2.47% |
| BLDR | $75.37 | -0.33% | 8.1B | 28.77 | $2.62 | N/A |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRTA vs TT Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while TT trades at $458.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check TT's competition here
FRTA vs LII Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while LII trades at $516.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check LII's competition here
FRTA vs CSL Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while CSL trades at $344.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check CSL's competition here
FRTA vs AAON Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AAON trades at $143.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 101.06. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AAON's competition here
FRTA vs WMS Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while WMS trades at $135.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check WMS's competition here
FRTA vs OC Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while OC trades at $120.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -25.41. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check OC's competition here
FRTA vs BLDR Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while BLDR trades at $75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check BLDR's competition here
FRTA vs FBHS Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check FBHS's competition here
FRTA vs AZEK Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AZEK's competition here
FRTA vs SSD Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while SSD trades at $187.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check SSD's competition here
FRTA vs BECN Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check BECN's competition here
FRTA vs AWI Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AWI trades at $152.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AWI's competition here
FRTA vs FBIN Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while FBIN trades at $39.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check FBIN's competition here
FRTA vs TREX Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while TREX trades at $41.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check TREX's competition here
FRTA vs GMS Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check GMS's competition here
FRTA vs DOOR Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check DOOR's competition here
FRTA vs PGTI Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check PGTI's competition here
FRTA vs ROCK Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while ROCK trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check ROCK's competition here
FRTA vs NX Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 844.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while NX trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check NX's competition here
FRTA vs APOG Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 823.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while APOG trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check APOG's competition here
FRTA vs JBI Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 696.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while JBI trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check JBI's competition here
FRTA vs SWIM Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while SWIM trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check SWIM's competition here
FRTA vs ASPN Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 516.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while ASPN trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check ASPN's competition here
FRTA vs BXC Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while BXC trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -107.16. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check BXC's competition here
FRTA vs PHOE Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while PHOE trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 500.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check PHOE's competition here
FRTA vs PPIH Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while PPIH trades at $32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check PPIH's competition here
FRTA vs JELD Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while JELD trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check JELD's competition here
FRTA vs SMJF Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while SMJF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 169.67. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check SMJF's competition here
FRTA vs CSTE Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while CSTE trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check CSTE's competition here
FRTA vs APT Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while APT trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check APT's competition here
FRTA vs ILAG Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while ILAG trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check ILAG's competition here
FRTA vs VIEW Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check VIEW's competition here
FRTA vs AEHL Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 632.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AEHL trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AEHL's competition here
FRTA vs VIEWW Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check VIEWW's competition here
FRTA vs AFI Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AFI's competition here
FRTA vs LAYN Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check LAYN's competition here
FRTA vs HW Comparison June 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check HW's competition here