Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSL | $345.98 | +0.99% | 14B | 20.19 | $17.14 | +1.28% |
| TT | $456.84 | -1.49% | 101B | 34.92 | $13.08 | +0.88% |
| LII | $508.43 | -1.86% | 17.7B | 22.56 | $22.52 | +1.03% |
| AAON | $132.62 | -7.68% | 10.9B | 93.39 | $1.42 | +0.30% |
| WMS | $130.15 | -0.80% | 10B | 23.88 | $5.45 | +0.57% |
| OC | $119.20 | -0.96% | 9.6B | -25.15 | -$4.74 | +2.50% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| BLDR | $73.64 | -1.79% | 7.9B | 28.11 | $2.62 | N/A |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
| BECN | $124.17 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 25.39 | $4.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSL vs TT Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while TT trades at $456.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check TT's competition here
CSL vs LII Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while LII trades at $508.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check LII's competition here
CSL vs AAON Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while AAON trades at $132.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 93.39. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AAON's competition here
CSL vs WMS Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while WMS trades at $130.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check WMS's competition here
CSL vs OC Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while OC trades at $119.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -25.15. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check OC's competition here
CSL vs FBHS Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FBHS's competition here
CSL vs BLDR Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while BLDR trades at $73.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BLDR's competition here
CSL vs AZEK Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AZEK's competition here
CSL vs BECN Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BECN's competition here
CSL vs SSD Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while SSD trades at $185.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SSD's competition here
CSL vs AWI Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while AWI trades at $155.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AWI's competition here
CSL vs FBIN Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while FBIN trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FBIN's competition here
CSL vs GMS Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check GMS's competition here
CSL vs TREX Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while TREX trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check TREX's competition here
CSL vs DOOR Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check DOOR's competition here
CSL vs PGTI Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PGTI's competition here
CSL vs ROCK Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while ROCK trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ROCK's competition here
CSL vs APOG Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 790.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while APOG trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check APOG's competition here
CSL vs NX Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 708.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while NX trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check NX's competition here
CSL vs JBI Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 693.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while JBI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JBI's competition here
CSL vs SWIM Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 619.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while SWIM trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 75.43. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SWIM's competition here
CSL vs ASPN Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 467.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while ASPN trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ASPN's competition here
CSL vs BXC Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while BXC trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -102.59. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check BXC's competition here
CSL vs PHOE Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 340.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while PHOE trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 525.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PHOE's competition here
CSL vs PPIH Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while PPIH trades at $31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check PPIH's competition here
CSL vs JELD Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while JELD trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check JELD's competition here
CSL vs SMJF Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while SMJF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 175.67. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check SMJF's competition here
CSL vs CSTE Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while CSTE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check CSTE's competition here
CSL vs APT Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while APT trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check APT's competition here
CSL vs ILAG Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while ILAG trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check ILAG's competition here
CSL vs VIEW Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check VIEW's competition here
CSL vs AEHL Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 581.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while AEHL trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AEHL's competition here
CSL vs VIEWW Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check VIEWW's competition here
CSL vs HW Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check HW's competition here
CSL vs FRTA Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check FRTA's competition here
CSL vs LAYN Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check LAYN's competition here
CSL vs AFI Comparison June 2026
CSL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSL stands at 14B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSL is priced at $345.98, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.19, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CSL's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSL is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSL.Check AFI's competition here