United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UFCS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | $43.75 | +0.12% | 1.1B | 8.71 | $4.96 | +1.57% |
| CB | $314.27 | +0.64% | 121.3B | 11.06 | $28.28 | +1.24% |
| PGR | $194.54 | -1.16% | 113.1B | 9.84 | $19.67 | +7.18% |
| TRV | $292.80 | +0.32% | 61.7B | 8.65 | $33.52 | +1.52% |
| ALL | $210.21 | -0.12% | 53.9B | 4.63 | $45.19 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PB | $25.82 | +0.08% | 53.9B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PH | $20.03 | -0.55% | 49.5B | 3.33 | $5.98 | +1.98% |
| HIG | $127.37 | +0.16% | 34.5B | 8.87 | $14.20 | +1.84% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| CINF | $160.42 | +1.53% | 24.4B | 9.03 | $17.49 | +2.25% |
Stock Comparison
UFCS vs CB Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while CB trades at $314.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CB's competition here
UFCS vs PGR Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while PGR trades at $194.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PGR's competition here
UFCS vs TRV Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while TRV trades at $292.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check TRV's competition here
UFCS vs ALL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ALL trades at $210.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PB Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ALL-PB trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PH Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ALL-PH trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
UFCS vs HIG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HIG trades at $127.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HIG's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
UFCS vs CINF Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while CINF trades at $160.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CINF's competition here
UFCS vs WRB Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while WRB trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB's competition here
UFCS vs MKL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while MKL trades at $1,786.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MKL's competition here
UFCS vs L Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while L trades at $104.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check L's competition here
UFCS vs HIG-PG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HIG-PG trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HIG-PG's competition here
UFCS vs CNA Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while CNA trades at $42.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNA's competition here
UFCS vs AFG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFG trades at $128.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFG's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while WRB-PE trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PF Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while WRB-PF trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
UFCS vs AXS-PE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AXS-PE trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AXS-PE's competition here
UFCS vs AXS Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AXS trades at $95.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AXS's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PJ Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
UFCS vs KNSL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while KNSL trades at $291.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KNSL's competition here
UFCS vs THG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while THG trades at $187.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check THG's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while WRB-PG trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
UFCS vs WRB-PH Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while WRB-PH trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
UFCS vs MCY Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while MCY trades at $97.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MCY's competition here
UFCS vs SIGI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while SIGI trades at $85.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SIGI's competition here
UFCS vs WTM Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while WTM trades at $2,017.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check WTM's competition here
UFCS vs ALL-PI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ALL-PI trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
UFCS vs RLI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while RLI trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check RLI's competition here
UFCS vs LMND Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while LMND trades at $51.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -24.95. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check LMND's competition here
UFCS vs HGTY-WT Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
UFCS vs HGTY Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HGTY trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HGTY's competition here
UFCS vs AHL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL's competition here
UFCS vs PLMR Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while PLMR trades at $102.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PLMR's competition here
UFCS vs AHL-PD Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AHL-PD trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -81.36. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL-PD's competition here
UFCS vs HCI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HCI trades at $151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HCI's competition here
UFCS vs STC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while STC trades at $63.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check STC's competition here
UFCS vs SLDE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while SLDE trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SLDE's competition here
UFCS vs AHL-PE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AHL-PE trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.30. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL-PE's competition here
UFCS vs HMN Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HMN trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HMN's competition here
UFCS vs AFGB Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFGB trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGB's competition here
UFCS vs SKWD Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while SKWD trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SKWD's competition here
UFCS vs AFGD Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFGD trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGD's competition here
UFCS vs AFGC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFGC trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGC's competition here
UFCS vs KMPB Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while KMPB trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KMPB's competition here
UFCS vs KMPR Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while KMPR trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KMPR's competition here
UFCS vs AFGE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFGE trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFGE's competition here
UFCS vs PRA Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while PRA trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PRA's competition here
UFCS vs ARGO Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ARGO's competition here
UFCS vs MHLA Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while MHLA trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MHLA's competition here
UFCS vs SAFT Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while SAFT trades at $68.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SAFT's competition here
UFCS vs UVE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while UVE trades at $35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check UVE's competition here
UFCS vs SIGIP Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 974.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while SIGIP trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check SIGIP's competition here
UFCS vs ASIC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 920.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ASIC trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ASIC's competition here
UFCS vs BOW Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 798.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while BOW trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check BOW's competition here
UFCS vs ROOT Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ROOT trades at $52.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ROOT's competition here
UFCS vs DGICB Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 663.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while DGICB trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check DGICB's competition here
UFCS vs HRTG Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 634M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HRTG trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HRTG's competition here
UFCS vs DGICA Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 606.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while DGICA trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check DGICA's competition here
UFCS vs ACIC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ACIC trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ACIC's competition here
UFCS vs GBLI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while GBLI trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check GBLI's competition here
UFCS vs UIHC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check UIHC's competition here
UFCS vs AII Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AII trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AII's competition here
UFCS vs NODK Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 294.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while NODK trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -68.38. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check NODK's competition here
UFCS vs PRHIZ Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while PRHIZ trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
UFCS vs KINS Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while KINS trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check KINS's competition here
UFCS vs CNFR Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNFR's competition here
UFCS vs PRHI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while PRHI trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check PRHI's competition here
UFCS vs CNFRZ Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
UFCS vs UNAM Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check UNAM's competition here
UFCS vs HALL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check HALL's competition here
UFCS vs ARGO-PA Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
UFCS vs AFHBL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFHBL's competition here
UFCS vs GFZ Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check GFZ's competition here
UFCS vs MILE Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MILE's competition here
UFCS vs ENH Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check ENH's competition here
UFCS vs Y Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check Y's competition here
UFCS vs MILEW Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check MILEW's competition here
UFCS vs STFC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check STFC's competition here
UFCS vs AFSI Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AFSI's competition here
UFCS vs FNHC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check FNHC's competition here
UFCS vs GBLIL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check GBLIL's competition here
UFCS vs NSEC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check NSEC's competition here
UFCS vs AHL-PC Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
UFCS vs CNFRL Comparison June 2026
UFCS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFCS stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFCS is priced at $43.75, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFCS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFCS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UFCS is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFCS.Check CNFRL's competition here