Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KINS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINS | $14.92 | -0.67% | 217.7M | 6.80 | $2.21 | +1.33% |
| CB | $312.96 | +1.03% | 121.2B | 11.05 | $28.28 | +1.24% |
| PGR | $195.25 | +1.34% | 115B | 10.01 | $19.67 | +7.06% |
| TRV | $291.12 | +0.76% | 62.1B | 8.71 | $33.52 | +1.50% |
| ALL | $210.83 | +1.74% | 54.2B | 4.66 | $45.19 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PB | $25.94 | +0.04% | 54B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| ALL-PH | $19.90 | -1.44% | 50.1B | 3.37 | $5.98 | +1.96% |
| HIG | $126.59 | +0.02% | 34.9B | 8.95 | $14.21 | +1.81% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.96% |
| CINF | $157.81 | +0.62% | 24.4B | 9.03 | $17.50 | +2.24% |
Stock Comparison
KINS vs CB Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 121.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while CB trades at $312.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CB's competition here
KINS vs PGR Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while PGR trades at $195.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PGR's competition here
KINS vs TRV Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while TRV trades at $291.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check TRV's competition here
KINS vs ALL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ALL trades at $210.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PB Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ALL-PB trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PB's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PH Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ALL-PH trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PH's competition here
KINS vs HIG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HIG trades at $126.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HIG's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PG's competition here
KINS vs CINF Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while CINF trades at $157.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CINF's competition here
KINS vs WRB Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while WRB trades at $65.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB's competition here
KINS vs MKL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while MKL trades at $1,769.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MKL's competition here
KINS vs L Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, L has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while L trades at $105.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check L's competition here
KINS vs HIG-PG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HIG-PG trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HIG-PG's competition here
KINS vs CNA Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while CNA trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNA's competition here
KINS vs AFG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFG trades at $128.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while WRB-PE trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PE's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PF Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while WRB-PF trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PF's competition here
KINS vs AXS-PE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AXS-PE trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AXS-PE's competition here
KINS vs AXS Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AXS trades at $94.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AXS's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PJ Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
KINS vs KNSL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while KNSL trades at $290.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KNSL's competition here
KINS vs THG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while THG trades at $185.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check THG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while WRB-PG trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PG's competition here
KINS vs WRB-PH Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while WRB-PH trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WRB-PH's competition here
KINS vs MCY Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while MCY trades at $97.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MCY's competition here
KINS vs SIGI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while SIGI trades at $85.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGI's competition here
KINS vs WTM Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while WTM trades at $2,027.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check WTM's competition here
KINS vs ALL-PI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ALL-PI trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ALL-PI's competition here
KINS vs RLI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while RLI trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check RLI's competition here
KINS vs LMND Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while LMND trades at $52.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -27.54. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check LMND's competition here
KINS vs HGTY-WT Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
KINS vs HGTY Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HGTY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HGTY's competition here
KINS vs AHL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL's competition here
KINS vs PLMR Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while PLMR trades at $101.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PLMR's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PD Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AHL-PD trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -81.60. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PD's competition here
KINS vs SLDE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while SLDE trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SLDE's competition here
KINS vs STC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while STC trades at $62.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STC's competition here
KINS vs HCI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HCI trades at $147.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HCI's competition here
KINS vs HMN Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HMN trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HMN's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AHL-PE trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.43. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PE's competition here
KINS vs SKWD Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while SKWD trades at $43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SKWD's competition here
KINS vs AFGB Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFGB trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGB's competition here
KINS vs AFGD Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFGD trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGD's competition here
KINS vs AFGC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFGC trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGC's competition here
KINS vs KMPR Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while KMPR trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPR's competition here
KINS vs KMPB Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while KMPB trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check KMPB's competition here
KINS vs AFGE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFGE trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFGE's competition here
KINS vs PRA Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while PRA trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRA's competition here
KINS vs UFCS Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while UFCS trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UFCS's competition here
KINS vs ARGO Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO's competition here
KINS vs SAFT Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while SAFT trades at $68.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SAFT's competition here
KINS vs UVE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while UVE trades at $35.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UVE's competition here
KINS vs MHLA Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 996.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while MHLA trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MHLA's competition here
KINS vs SIGIP Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 967.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while SIGIP trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check SIGIP's competition here
KINS vs ASIC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 952M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ASIC trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ASIC's competition here
KINS vs BOW Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 844.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while BOW trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check BOW's competition here
KINS vs ROOT Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 781.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ROOT trades at $51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ROOT's competition here
KINS vs DGICB Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 662.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while DGICB trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICB's competition here
KINS vs HRTG Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 643.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HRTG trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HRTG's competition here
KINS vs DGICA Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 622.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while DGICA trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check DGICA's competition here
KINS vs ACIC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 505.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ACIC trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ACIC's competition here
KINS vs GBLI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while GBLI trades at $26.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLI's competition here
KINS vs UIHC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UIHC's competition here
KINS vs AII Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 328.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AII trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AII's competition here
KINS vs NODK Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 296.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while NODK trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -68.98. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NODK's competition here
KINS vs PRHIZ Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 236.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while PRHIZ trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHIZ's competition here
KINS vs CNFR Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFR's competition here
KINS vs PRHI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while PRHI trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check PRHI's competition here
KINS vs CNFRZ Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRZ's competition here
KINS vs UNAM Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check UNAM's competition here
KINS vs HALL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check HALL's competition here
KINS vs ARGO-PA Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
KINS vs AHL-PC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AHL-PC's competition here
KINS vs GBLIL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GBLIL's competition here
KINS vs CNFRL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check CNFRL's competition here
KINS vs ENH Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check ENH's competition here
KINS vs AFHBL Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFHBL's competition here
KINS vs MILEW Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILEW's competition here
KINS vs MILE Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check MILE's competition here
KINS vs Y Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check Y's competition here
KINS vs STFC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check STFC's competition here
KINS vs AFSI Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check AFSI's competition here
KINS vs FNHC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check FNHC's competition here
KINS vs GFZ Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check GFZ's competition here
KINS vs NSEC Comparison June 2026
KINS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINS stands at 217.7M. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KINS is priced at $14.92, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.80, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, KINS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KINS is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINS.Check NSEC's competition here