Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SAFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | $70.27 | +2.82% | 1B | 16.61 | $4.23 | +5.21% |
| CB | $326.27 | +3.74% | 126.6B | 11.54 | $28.27 | +1.19% |
| PGR | $204.02 | +4.42% | 119.2B | 10.38 | $19.66 | +6.82% |
| TRV | $303.25 | +3.35% | 64.5B | 9.05 | $33.52 | +1.45% |
| ALL | $221.01 | +4.82% | 56.9B | 4.89 | $45.20 | +1.89% |
| ALL-PB | $25.76 | -0.08% | 53.8B | 2.14 | $12.04 | +1.89% |
| ALL-PH | $19.91 | -0.35% | 49.5B | 3.36 | $5.91 | +1.89% |
| HIG | $132.14 | +3.78% | 36.2B | 9.30 | $14.20 | +1.76% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.89% |
| CINF | $165.29 | +2.88% | 25.6B | 9.45 | $17.49 | +2.15% |
Stock Comparison
SAFT vs CB Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 126.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while CB trades at $326.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CB's competition here
SAFT vs PGR Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 119.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while PGR trades at $204.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PGR's competition here
SAFT vs TRV Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while TRV trades at $303.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check TRV's competition here
SAFT vs ALL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ALL trades at $221.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PB Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ALL-PB trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PB's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PH Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ALL-PH trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PH's competition here
SAFT vs HIG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HIG trades at $132.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HIG's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PG's competition here
SAFT vs CINF Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while CINF trades at $165.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CINF's competition here
SAFT vs WRB Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while WRB trades at $68.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB's competition here
SAFT vs MKL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while MKL trades at $1,818.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MKL's competition here
SAFT vs L Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while L trades at $107.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check L's competition here
SAFT vs HIG-PG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HIG-PG trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HIG-PG's competition here
SAFT vs CNA Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while CNA trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNA's competition here
SAFT vs AFG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFG trades at $132.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while WRB-PE trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PE's competition here
SAFT vs AXS Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AXS trades at $98.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PF Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while WRB-PF trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PF's competition here
SAFT vs AXS-PE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AXS-PE trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AXS-PE's competition here
SAFT vs KNSL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while KNSL trades at $306.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KNSL's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PJ Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
SAFT vs THG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while THG trades at $193.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check THG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while WRB-PG trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PG's competition here
SAFT vs WRB-PH Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while WRB-PH trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WRB-PH's competition here
SAFT vs MCY Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while MCY trades at $101.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MCY's competition here
SAFT vs SIGI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while SIGI trades at $88.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGI's competition here
SAFT vs WTM Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while WTM trades at $2,065.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check WTM's competition here
SAFT vs ALL-PI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ALL-PI trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ALL-PI's competition here
SAFT vs RLI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while RLI trades at $52.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check RLI's competition here
SAFT vs LMND Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while LMND trades at $51.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -27.09. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check LMND's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY-WT Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
SAFT vs HGTY Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HGTY trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HGTY's competition here
SAFT vs AHL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL's competition here
SAFT vs PLMR Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while PLMR trades at $108.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PLMR's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PD Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AHL-PD trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -80.70. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PD's competition here
SAFT vs HCI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HCI trades at $156.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HCI's competition here
SAFT vs STC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while STC trades at $65.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STC's competition here
SAFT vs SLDE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while SLDE trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SLDE's competition here
SAFT vs HMN Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HMN trades at $46.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HMN's competition here
SAFT vs SKWD Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while SKWD trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SKWD's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AHL-PE trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -80.41. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PE's competition here
SAFT vs AFGB Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFGB trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGB's competition here
SAFT vs AFGD Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFGD trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGD's competition here
SAFT vs AFGC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFGC trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGC's competition here
SAFT vs KMPR Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while KMPR trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPR's competition here
SAFT vs KMPB Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while KMPB trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KMPB's competition here
SAFT vs AFGE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFGE trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFGE's competition here
SAFT vs PRA Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while PRA trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRA's competition here
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while UFCS trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UFCS's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO's competition here
SAFT vs UVE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while UVE trades at $37.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UVE's competition here
SAFT vs MHLA Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while MHLA trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MHLA's competition here
SAFT vs ASIC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 978.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ASIC trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ASIC's competition here
SAFT vs SIGIP Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 975.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while SIGIP trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check SIGIP's competition here
SAFT vs BOW Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 845.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while BOW trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check BOW's competition here
SAFT vs ROOT Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ROOT trades at $53.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ROOT's competition here
SAFT vs DGICB Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 708.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while DGICB trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICB's competition here
SAFT vs HRTG Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 672.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HRTG trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HRTG's competition here
SAFT vs DGICA Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 631.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while DGICA trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check DGICA's competition here
SAFT vs ACIC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ACIC trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ACIC's competition here
SAFT vs GBLI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while GBLI trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLI's competition here
SAFT vs UIHC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UIHC's competition here
SAFT vs AII Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AII trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AII's competition here
SAFT vs NODK Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 304.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while NODK trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -70.81. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NODK's competition here
SAFT vs PRHIZ Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while PRHIZ trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRHIZ's competition here
SAFT vs KINS Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while KINS trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check KINS's competition here
SAFT vs CNFR Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFR's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRZ Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRZ's competition here
SAFT vs PRHI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while PRHI trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check PRHI's competition here
SAFT vs UNAM Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check UNAM's competition here
SAFT vs HALL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check HALL's competition here
SAFT vs ARGO-PA Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
SAFT vs CNFRL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check CNFRL's competition here
SAFT vs AFHBL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFHBL's competition here
SAFT vs Y Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check Y's competition here
SAFT vs MILE Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILE's competition here
SAFT vs GBLIL Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GBLIL's competition here
SAFT vs STFC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check STFC's competition here
SAFT vs ENH Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check ENH's competition here
SAFT vs MILEW Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check MILEW's competition here
SAFT vs AFSI Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AFSI's competition here
SAFT vs FNHC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check FNHC's competition here
SAFT vs NSEC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check NSEC's competition here
SAFT vs AHL-PC Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check AHL-PC's competition here
SAFT vs GFZ Comparison June 2026
SAFT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAFT stands at 1B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SAFT is priced at $70.27, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAFT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.61, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAFT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAFT is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAFT.Check GFZ's competition here