Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMN | $45.53 | -1.17% | 1.8B | 11.38 | $3.98 | +3.13% |
| CB | $317.14 | +1.56% | 121.3B | 11.06 | $28.28 | +1.24% |
| PGR | $197.14 | +0.16% | 113.1B | 9.84 | $19.67 | +7.18% |
| TRV | $295.08 | +1.10% | 61.7B | 8.65 | $33.52 | +1.52% |
| ALL | $212.90 | +1.16% | 53.9B | 4.63 | $45.19 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PB | $25.85 | +0.17% | 53.9B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| ALL-PH | $19.98 | -0.79% | 49.5B | 3.33 | $5.98 | +1.98% |
| HIG | $128.17 | +0.79% | 34.5B | 8.87 | $14.20 | +1.84% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.98% |
| CINF | $160.81 | +1.78% | 24.4B | 9.03 | $17.49 | +2.25% |
Stock Comparison
HMN vs CB Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while CB trades at $317.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check CB's competition here
HMN vs PGR Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while PGR trades at $197.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check PGR's competition here
HMN vs TRV Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while TRV trades at $295.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check TRV's competition here
HMN vs ALL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ALL trades at $212.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ALL's competition here
HMN vs ALL-PB Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ALL-PB trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ALL-PB's competition here
HMN vs ALL-PH Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ALL-PH trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ALL-PH's competition here
HMN vs HIG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HIG trades at $128.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HIG's competition here
HMN vs ALL-PG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ALL-PG's competition here
HMN vs CINF Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while CINF trades at $160.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check CINF's competition here
HMN vs WRB Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while WRB trades at $67.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check WRB's competition here
HMN vs MKL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while MKL trades at $1,797.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check MKL's competition here
HMN vs L Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while L trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check L's competition here
HMN vs HIG-PG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HIG-PG trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HIG-PG's competition here
HMN vs CNA Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while CNA trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check CNA's competition here
HMN vs AFG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFG trades at $130.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFG's competition here
HMN vs WRB-PE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while WRB-PE trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check WRB-PE's competition here
HMN vs WRB-PF Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while WRB-PF trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check WRB-PF's competition here
HMN vs AXS-PE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AXS-PE trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AXS-PE's competition here
HMN vs AXS Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AXS trades at $95.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AXS's competition here
HMN vs ALL-PJ Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
HMN vs KNSL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while KNSL trades at $298.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check KNSL's competition here
HMN vs THG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while THG trades at $189.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check THG's competition here
HMN vs WRB-PG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while WRB-PG trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check WRB-PG's competition here
HMN vs WRB-PH Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while WRB-PH trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check WRB-PH's competition here
HMN vs MCY Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while MCY trades at $97.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check MCY's competition here
HMN vs SIGI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while SIGI trades at $87.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check SIGI's competition here
HMN vs WTM Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while WTM trades at $2,043.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check WTM's competition here
HMN vs ALL-PI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ALL-PI trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ALL-PI's competition here
HMN vs RLI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while RLI trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check RLI's competition here
HMN vs LMND Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while LMND trades at $53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -24.95. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check LMND's competition here
HMN vs HGTY-WT Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
HMN vs HGTY Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HGTY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HGTY's competition here
HMN vs AHL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AHL's competition here
HMN vs PLMR Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while PLMR trades at $104.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check PLMR's competition here
HMN vs AHL-PD Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AHL-PD trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -81.36. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AHL-PD's competition here
HMN vs HCI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HCI trades at $152.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HCI's competition here
HMN vs STC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while STC trades at $64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check STC's competition here
HMN vs SLDE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while SLDE trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check SLDE's competition here
HMN vs AHL-PE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AHL-PE trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.30. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AHL-PE's competition here
HMN vs AFGB Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFGB trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFGB's competition here
HMN vs SKWD Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while SKWD trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check SKWD's competition here
HMN vs AFGD Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFGD trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFGD's competition here
HMN vs AFGC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFGC trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFGC's competition here
HMN vs KMPB Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while KMPB trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check KMPB's competition here
HMN vs KMPR Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while KMPR trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check KMPR's competition here
HMN vs AFGE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFGE trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFGE's competition here
HMN vs PRA Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while PRA trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check PRA's competition here
HMN vs UFCS Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while UFCS trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check UFCS's competition here
HMN vs ARGO Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ARGO's competition here
HMN vs MHLA Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while MHLA trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check MHLA's competition here
HMN vs SAFT Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while SAFT trades at $69.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check SAFT's competition here
HMN vs UVE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while UVE trades at $36.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check UVE's competition here
HMN vs SIGIP Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 974.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while SIGIP trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check SIGIP's competition here
HMN vs ASIC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 920.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ASIC trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ASIC's competition here
HMN vs BOW Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 798.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while BOW trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check BOW's competition here
HMN vs ROOT Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ROOT trades at $54.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ROOT's competition here
HMN vs DGICB Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 663.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while DGICB trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check DGICB's competition here
HMN vs HRTG Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 634M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HRTG trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HRTG's competition here
HMN vs DGICA Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 606.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while DGICA trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check DGICA's competition here
HMN vs ACIC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ACIC trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ACIC's competition here
HMN vs GBLI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 386.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while GBLI trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check GBLI's competition here
HMN vs UIHC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check UIHC's competition here
HMN vs AII Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AII trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AII's competition here
HMN vs NODK Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 294.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while NODK trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -68.38. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check NODK's competition here
HMN vs PRHIZ Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while PRHIZ trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check PRHIZ's competition here
HMN vs KINS Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while KINS trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check KINS's competition here
HMN vs CNFR Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check CNFR's competition here
HMN vs PRHI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while PRHI trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check PRHI's competition here
HMN vs CNFRZ Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check CNFRZ's competition here
HMN vs UNAM Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check UNAM's competition here
HMN vs HALL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check HALL's competition here
HMN vs ARGO-PA Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
HMN vs AFHBL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFHBL's competition here
HMN vs GFZ Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check GFZ's competition here
HMN vs MILE Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check MILE's competition here
HMN vs ENH Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check ENH's competition here
HMN vs Y Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check Y's competition here
HMN vs MILEW Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check MILEW's competition here
HMN vs STFC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check STFC's competition here
HMN vs AFSI Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AFSI's competition here
HMN vs FNHC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check FNHC's competition here
HMN vs GBLIL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check GBLIL's competition here
HMN vs NSEC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check NSEC's competition here
HMN vs AHL-PC Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check AHL-PC's competition here
HMN vs CNFRL Comparison June 2026
HMN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HMN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HMN is priced at $45.53, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HMN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.38, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HMN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HMN is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HMN.Check CNFRL's competition here