D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | $30.14 | +2.20% | 11.1B | -26.43 | -$1.14 | N/A |
| DELL | $420.91 | +32.76% | 284.4B | 48.48 | $8.69 | +0.53% |
| ANET | $159.47 | +2.70% | 200.9B | 54.84 | $2.91 | N/A |
| STX | $879.80 | -0.10% | 197.3B | 83.55 | $10.53 | +0.34% |
| WDC | $531.21 | +0.01% | 183.1B | 31.75 | $16.73 | +0.09% |
| HPE | $43.04 | +12.63% | 57.2B | -253.44 | -$0.17 | +1.27% |
| NTAP | $174.29 | +22.39% | 34.5B | 27.45 | $6.35 | +1.17% |
| PSTG | $86.22 | +9.14% | 28.5B | 156.76 | $0.55 | N/A |
| SMCI | $46.09 | +11.60% | 27.7B | 24.26 | $1.90 | N/A |
| IONQ | $72.07 | +2.75% | 26.9B | 184.77 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QBTS vs DELL Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 284.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while DELL trades at $420.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 48.48. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DELL's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DELL's competition here
QBTS vs ANET Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while ANET trades at $159.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 54.84. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ANET's competition here
QBTS vs STX Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 197.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while STX trades at $879.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 83.55. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to STX's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STX's competition here
QBTS vs WDC Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 183.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while WDC trades at $531.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check WDC's competition here
QBTS vs HPE Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while HPE trades at $43.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is -253.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HPE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HPE's competition here
QBTS vs NTAP Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while NTAP trades at $174.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NTAP's competition here
QBTS vs PSTG Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while PSTG trades at $86.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check PSTG's competition here
QBTS vs SMCI Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while SMCI trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SMCI's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while IONQ trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is 184.77. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IONQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ's competition here
QBTS vs HPQ Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while HPQ trades at $27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HPQ's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ-WT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while IONQ-WT trades at $60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
QBTS vs CAJ Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAJ's competition here
QBTS vs LOGI Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while LOGI trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LOGI's competition here
QBTS vs RGTI Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while RGTI trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTI's competition here
QBTS vs QBTS-WT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
QBTS vs SNDKV Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SNDKV's competition here
QBTS vs RGTIW Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while RGTIW trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTIW's competition here
QBTS vs INFQ Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while INFQ trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -115.79. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check INFQ's competition here
QBTS vs QUBT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while QUBT trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QUBT's competition here
QBTS vs RCAT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while RCAT trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RCAT's competition here
QBTS vs CRSR Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while CRSR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is 134.89. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRSR's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG-WT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
QBTS vs SSYS Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 908.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while SSYS trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SSYS's competition here
QBTS vs CRCT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 871.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while CRCT trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRCT's competition here
QBTS vs DDD Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while DDD trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DDD's competition here
QBTS vs VELO Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 465.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while VELO trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VELO's competition here
QBTS vs OSS Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while OSS trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -454.50. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check OSS's competition here
QBTS vs NNDM Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while NNDM trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NNDM's competition here
QBTS vs BGIN Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 328.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while BGIN trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check BGIN's competition here
QBTS vs CAN Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while CAN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAN's competition here
QBTS vs TIO Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TIO's competition here
QBTS vs DM Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DM's competition here
QBTS vs QTEX Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QTEX has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while QTEX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas QTEX's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QTEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QTEX's competition here
QBTS vs ALOT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while ALOT trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -50.39. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ALOT's competition here
QBTS vs MICT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MICT's competition here
QBTS vs AMCI Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while AMCI trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check AMCI's competition here
QBTS vs VTIX Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while VTIX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VTIX's competition here
QBTS vs INVE Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while INVE trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check INVE's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG's competition here
QBTS vs QXL Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while QXL trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QXL's competition here
QBTS vs QMCO Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while QMCO trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QMCO's competition here
QBTS vs YIBO Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while YIBO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check YIBO's competition here
QBTS vs UAVS Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while UAVS trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check UAVS's competition here
QBTS vs TACT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while TACT trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -89.40. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TACT's competition here
QBTS vs KTCC Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while KTCC trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check KTCC's competition here
QBTS vs FATH Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH's competition here
QBTS vs EBON Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while EBON trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check EBON's competition here
QBTS vs SGE Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SGE's competition here
QBTS vs VLD-WT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD-WT's competition here
QBTS vs VLD Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD's competition here
QBTS vs SCKT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while SCKT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SCKT's competition here
QBTS vs VJET Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VJET's competition here
QBTS vs STRCW Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STRCW's competition here
QBTS vs ZSPC Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 175K. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while ZSPC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ZSPC's competition here
QBTS vs XPLR Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check XPLR's competition here
QBTS vs QLGC Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QLGC's competition here
QBTS vs LXK Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LXK's competition here
QBTS vs VMEM Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VMEM's competition here
QBTS vs HILL Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HILL's competition here
QBTS vs FATH-WT Comparison June 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 11.1B. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $30.14, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.43, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH-WT's competition here