One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSS | $16.80 | -11.70% | 467.1M | -471.50 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| DELL | $394.48 | -6.32% | 280.2B | 48.66 | $8.67 | +0.52% |
| ANET | $154.12 | -11.61% | 209.1B | 57.08 | $2.91 | N/A |
| STX | $860.05 | -8.57% | 207.6B | 87.85 | $10.54 | +0.31% |
| WDC | $523.10 | -11.95% | 198.4B | 34.44 | $16.71 | +0.08% |
| HPE | $49.34 | -10.53% | 71.1B | 50.21 | $1.07 | +1.01% |
| NTAP | $168.41 | -7.00% | 35.4B | 28.21 | $6.34 | +1.17% |
| PSTG | $86.22 | +9.14% | 28.5B | 156.76 | $0.55 | N/A |
| SMCI | $41.64 | -12.19% | 28.2B | 24.68 | $1.90 | N/A |
| IONQ | $57.26 | -16.08% | 24.5B | 168.26 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OSS vs DELL Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 280.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while DELL trades at $394.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 48.66. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DELL's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check DELL's competition here
OSS vs ANET Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while ANET trades at $154.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 57.08. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check ANET's competition here
OSS vs STX Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 207.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while STX trades at $860.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 87.85. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STX's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check STX's competition here
OSS vs WDC Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while WDC trades at $523.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check WDC's competition here
OSS vs HPE Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while HPE trades at $49.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 50.21. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check HPE's competition here
OSS vs NTAP Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while NTAP trades at $168.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check NTAP's competition here
OSS vs PSTG Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while PSTG trades at $86.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check PSTG's competition here
OSS vs SMCI Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while SMCI trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check SMCI's competition here
OSS vs IONQ Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while IONQ trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is 168.26. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IONQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check IONQ's competition here
OSS vs HPQ Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while HPQ trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check HPQ's competition here
OSS vs CAJ Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check CAJ's competition here
OSS vs IONQ-WT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while IONQ-WT trades at $45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
OSS vs LOGI Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while LOGI trades at $113.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check LOGI's competition here
OSS vs QBTS Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QBTS trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -24.25. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QBTS's competition here
OSS vs RGTI Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while RGTI trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check RGTI's competition here
OSS vs QBTS-WT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
OSS vs SNDKV Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check SNDKV's competition here
OSS vs RGTIW Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while RGTIW trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check RGTIW's competition here
OSS vs INFQ Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while INFQ trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -121.11. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check INFQ's competition here
OSS vs RCAT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while RCAT trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check RCAT's competition here
OSS vs QUBT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QUBT trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -43.04. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QUBT's competition here
OSS vs CRSR Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while CRSR trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is 110.22. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check CRSR's competition here
OSS vs MKFG-WT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
OSS vs CRCT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while CRCT trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check CRCT's competition here
OSS vs SSYS Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 823.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while SSYS trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check SSYS's competition here
OSS vs DDD Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 450.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while DDD trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check DDD's competition here
OSS vs VELO Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while VELO trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check VELO's competition here
OSS vs NNDM Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while NNDM trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check NNDM's competition here
OSS vs BGIN Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 307.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while BGIN trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check BGIN's competition here
OSS vs CAN Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while CAN trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check CAN's competition here
OSS vs TIO Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check TIO's competition here
OSS vs DM Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check DM's competition here
OSS vs MICT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check MICT's competition here
OSS vs AMCI Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while AMCI trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check AMCI's competition here
OSS vs ALOT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while ALOT trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -49.13. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check ALOT's competition here
OSS vs VTIX Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while VTIX trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check VTIX's competition here
OSS vs INVE Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while INVE trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check INVE's competition here
OSS vs QMCO Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QMCO trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QMCO's competition here
OSS vs MKFG Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check MKFG's competition here
OSS vs QTEX Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QTEX has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QTEX trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QTEX's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QTEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to QTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QTEX's competition here
OSS vs QXL Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QXL trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QXL's competition here
OSS vs YIBO Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while YIBO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check YIBO's competition here
OSS vs TACT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while TACT trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -93.20. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check TACT's competition here
OSS vs UAVS Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while UAVS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check UAVS's competition here
OSS vs KTCC Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while KTCC trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check KTCC's competition here
OSS vs FATH Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check FATH's competition here
OSS vs EBON Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while EBON trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check EBON's competition here
OSS vs SGE Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check SGE's competition here
OSS vs VLD-WT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check VLD-WT's competition here
OSS vs VLD Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check VLD's competition here
OSS vs SCKT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while SCKT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check SCKT's competition here
OSS vs VJET Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check VJET's competition here
OSS vs STRCW Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check STRCW's competition here
OSS vs ZSPC Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 224.3K. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while ZSPC trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check ZSPC's competition here
OSS vs LXK Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check LXK's competition here
OSS vs XPLR Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check XPLR's competition here
OSS vs VMEM Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check VMEM's competition here
OSS vs FATH-WT Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check FATH-WT's competition here
OSS vs HILL Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check HILL's competition here
OSS vs QLGC Comparison June 2026
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 467.1M. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $16.80, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -471.50, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.Check QLGC's competition here