Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation (FATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATH | $5.05 | -4.17% | 34.7M | 2.15 | $2.35 | N/A |
| DELL | $420.91 | +32.76% | 284.4B | 48.48 | $8.69 | +0.53% |
| ANET | $159.47 | +2.70% | 200.9B | 54.84 | $2.91 | N/A |
| STX | $879.80 | -0.10% | 197.3B | 83.55 | $10.53 | +0.34% |
| WDC | $531.21 | +0.01% | 183.1B | 31.75 | $16.73 | +0.09% |
| HPE | $43.04 | +12.63% | 57.2B | -253.44 | -$0.17 | +1.27% |
| NTAP | $174.29 | +22.39% | 34.5B | 27.45 | $6.35 | +1.17% |
| PSTG | $86.22 | +9.14% | 28.5B | 156.76 | $0.55 | N/A |
| SMCI | $46.09 | +11.60% | 27.7B | 24.26 | $1.90 | N/A |
| IONQ | $72.07 | +2.75% | 26.9B | 184.77 | $0.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FATH vs DELL Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 284.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DELL trades at $420.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 48.48. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DELL's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check DELL's competition here
FATH vs ANET Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ANET trades at $159.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 54.84. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check ANET's competition here
FATH vs STX Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 197.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STX trades at $879.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 83.55. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STX's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check STX's competition here
FATH vs WDC Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 183.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while WDC trades at $531.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check WDC's competition here
FATH vs HPE Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while HPE trades at $43.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is -253.44. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HPE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check HPE's competition here
FATH vs NTAP Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while NTAP trades at $174.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check NTAP's competition here
FATH vs PSTG Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while PSTG trades at $86.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check PSTG's competition here
FATH vs SMCI Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SMCI trades at $46.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SMCI's competition here
FATH vs IONQ Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while IONQ trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is 184.77. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IONQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check IONQ's competition here
FATH vs HPQ Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while HPQ trades at $27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check HPQ's competition here
FATH vs IONQ-WT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while IONQ-WT trades at $60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
FATH vs CAJ Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CAJ's competition here
FATH vs LOGI Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while LOGI trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check LOGI's competition here
FATH vs QBTS Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QBTS trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -26.43. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QBTS's competition here
FATH vs RGTI Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RGTI trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check RGTI's competition here
FATH vs QBTS-WT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
FATH vs SNDKV Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SNDKV's competition here
FATH vs RGTIW Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RGTIW trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check RGTIW's competition here
FATH vs INFQ Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while INFQ trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -115.79. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check INFQ's competition here
FATH vs QUBT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QUBT trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QUBT's competition here
FATH vs RCAT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while RCAT trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check RCAT's competition here
FATH vs CRSR Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CRSR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is 134.89. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CRSR's competition here
FATH vs MKFG-WT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
FATH vs SSYS Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 908.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SSYS trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SSYS's competition here
FATH vs CRCT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 871.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CRCT trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CRCT's competition here
FATH vs DDD Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DDD trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check DDD's competition here
FATH vs VELO Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 465.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VELO trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VELO's competition here
FATH vs OSS Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while OSS trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -454.50. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check OSS's competition here
FATH vs NNDM Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while NNDM trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check NNDM's competition here
FATH vs BGIN Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 328.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while BGIN trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check BGIN's competition here
FATH vs CAN Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while CAN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check CAN's competition here
FATH vs TIO Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check TIO's competition here
FATH vs DM Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check DM's competition here
FATH vs QTEX Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QTEX has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QTEX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QTEX's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QTEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QTEX's competition here
FATH vs ALOT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ALOT trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -50.39. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check ALOT's competition here
FATH vs MICT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check MICT's competition here
FATH vs AMCI Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while AMCI trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check AMCI's competition here
FATH vs VTIX Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VTIX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VTIX's competition here
FATH vs INVE Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while INVE trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check INVE's competition here
FATH vs MKFG Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check MKFG's competition here
FATH vs QXL Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QXL trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QXL's competition here
FATH vs QMCO Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QMCO trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QMCO's competition here
FATH vs YIBO Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while YIBO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check YIBO's competition here
FATH vs UAVS Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while UAVS trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check UAVS's competition here
FATH vs TACT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while TACT trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -89.40. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check TACT's competition here
FATH vs KTCC Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while KTCC trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check KTCC's competition here
FATH vs EBON Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while EBON trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check EBON's competition here
FATH vs SGE Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SGE's competition here
FATH vs VLD-WT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VLD-WT's competition here
FATH vs VLD Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VLD's competition here
FATH vs SCKT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while SCKT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check SCKT's competition here
FATH vs VJET Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VJET's competition here
FATH vs STRCW Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check STRCW's competition here
FATH vs ZSPC Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 175K. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while ZSPC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check ZSPC's competition here
FATH vs XPLR Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check XPLR's competition here
FATH vs FATH-WT Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check FATH-WT's competition here
FATH vs VMEM Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check VMEM's competition here
FATH vs LXK Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check LXK's competition here
FATH vs HILL Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check HILL's competition here
FATH vs QLGC Comparison June 2026
FATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FATH stands at 34.7M. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FATH is priced at $5.05, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FATH currently has a P/E ratio of 2.15, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FATH's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FATH is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FATH.Check QLGC's competition here