IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IONQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ | $68.28 | -1.44% | 26.6B | 182.97 | $0.39 | N/A |
| DELL | $414.74 | -10.99% | 289.2B | 50.22 | $8.67 | +0.51% |
| ANET | $175.09 | +2.58% | 220.8B | 60.46 | $2.90 | N/A |
| STX | $937.59 | +1.77% | 207.8B | 87.75 | $10.56 | +0.31% |
| WDC | $589.56 | +7.94% | 194.1B | 33.66 | $16.73 | +0.08% |
| HPE | $54.73 | +16.44% | 74.5B | 52.47 | $1.07 | +0.98% |
| NTAP | $179.79 | +0.05% | 34.8B | 27.70 | $6.34 | +1.19% |
| SMCI | $45.91 | -2.08% | 30.2B | 26.41 | $1.90 | N/A |
| PSTG | $86.22 | +9.14% | 28.5B | 156.76 | $0.55 | N/A |
| HPQ | $26.13 | -10.96% | 24.9B | 10.10 | $2.70 | +4.30% |
Stock Comparison
IONQ vs DELL Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 289.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while DELL trades at $414.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 50.22. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DELL's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check DELL's competition here
IONQ vs ANET Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 220.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while ANET trades at $175.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check ANET's competition here
IONQ vs STX Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while STX trades at $937.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 87.75. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STX's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check STX's competition here
IONQ vs WDC Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 194.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while WDC trades at $589.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check WDC's competition here
IONQ vs HPE Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while HPE trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check HPE's competition here
IONQ vs NTAP Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while NTAP trades at $179.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check NTAP's competition here
IONQ vs SMCI Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while SMCI trades at $45.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check SMCI's competition here
IONQ vs PSTG Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while PSTG trades at $86.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check PSTG's competition here
IONQ vs HPQ Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while HPQ trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check HPQ's competition here
IONQ vs IONQ-WT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while IONQ-WT trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
IONQ vs CAJ Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check CAJ's competition here
IONQ vs LOGI Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while LOGI trades at $119.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check LOGI's competition here
IONQ vs QBTS Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QBTS trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -26.24. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QBTS's competition here
IONQ vs RGTI Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while RGTI trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check RGTI's competition here
IONQ vs QBTS-WT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
IONQ vs SNDKV Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check SNDKV's competition here
IONQ vs RGTIW Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while RGTIW trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check RGTIW's competition here
IONQ vs INFQ Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while INFQ trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -152.92. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check INFQ's competition here
IONQ vs QUBT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QUBT trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -47.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QUBT's competition here
IONQ vs RCAT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while RCAT trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -21.99. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check RCAT's competition here
IONQ vs CRSR Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while CRSR trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is 128.11. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check CRSR's competition here
IONQ vs MKFG-WT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
IONQ vs SSYS Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 904.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while SSYS trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check SSYS's competition here
IONQ vs CRCT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 871.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while CRCT trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check CRCT's competition here
IONQ vs DDD Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while DDD trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check DDD's competition here
IONQ vs OSS Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while OSS trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -498.75. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check OSS's competition here
IONQ vs VELO Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while VELO trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VELO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check VELO's competition here
IONQ vs NNDM Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while NNDM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check NNDM's competition here
IONQ vs BGIN Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 293.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while BGIN trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check BGIN's competition here
IONQ vs CAN Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 185.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while CAN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check CAN's competition here
IONQ vs TIO Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check TIO's competition here
IONQ vs DM Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check DM's competition here
IONQ vs MICT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check MICT's competition here
IONQ vs ALOT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while ALOT trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -49.29. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check ALOT's competition here
IONQ vs AMCI Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while AMCI trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check AMCI's competition here
IONQ vs VTIX Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while VTIX trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check VTIX's competition here
IONQ vs QTEX Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QTEX has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QTEX trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QTEX's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QTEX's competition here
IONQ vs INVE Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 100.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while INVE trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check INVE's competition here
IONQ vs MKFG Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check MKFG's competition here
IONQ vs QMCO Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QMCO trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QMCO's competition here
IONQ vs QXL Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QXL trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QXL's competition here
IONQ vs YIBO Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while YIBO trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check YIBO's competition here
IONQ vs UAVS Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while UAVS trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check UAVS's competition here
IONQ vs TACT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while TACT trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -91.60. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check TACT's competition here
IONQ vs KTCC Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while KTCC trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check KTCC's competition here
IONQ vs FATH Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check FATH's competition here
IONQ vs EBON Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while EBON trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check EBON's competition here
IONQ vs SGE Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check SGE's competition here
IONQ vs VLD-WT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check VLD-WT's competition here
IONQ vs VLD Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check VLD's competition here
IONQ vs SCKT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while SCKT trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check SCKT's competition here
IONQ vs VJET Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check VJET's competition here
IONQ vs STRCW Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check STRCW's competition here
IONQ vs ZSPC Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 235.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while ZSPC trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check ZSPC's competition here
IONQ vs QLGC Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check QLGC's competition here
IONQ vs FATH-WT Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check FATH-WT's competition here
IONQ vs HILL Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check HILL's competition here
IONQ vs VMEM Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check VMEM's competition here
IONQ vs LXK Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check LXK's competition here
IONQ vs XPLR Comparison June 2026
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 26.6B. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $68.28, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of 182.97, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.Check XPLR's competition here