Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LULU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LULU | $126.03 | -0.35% | 15.1B | 9.51 | $13.25 | N/A |
| TJX | $157.90 | +2.74% | 174.5B | 30.78 | $5.13 | +1.11% |
| ROST | $232.62 | +3.93% | 75.2B | 32.43 | $7.17 | +0.72% |
| BURL | $328.70 | +2.38% | 20.8B | 34.04 | $9.73 | N/A |
| ONON | $37.52 | -2.09% | 13.1B | 39.10 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $21.19 | -0.56% | 7.6B | 8.41 | $2.52 | +3.16% |
| URBN | $72.57 | +0.43% | 6.5B | 13.96 | $5.20 | N/A |
| VSCO | $74.66 | -6.74% | 5.9B | 38.68 | $1.93 | N/A |
| BOOT | $170.69 | -0.70% | 5.2B | 23.20 | $7.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LULU vs TJX Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while TJX trades at $157.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check TJX's competition here
LULU vs ROST Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while ROST trades at $232.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ROST's competition here
LULU vs BURL Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while BURL trades at $328.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BURL's competition here
LULU vs ONON Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while ONON trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ONON's competition here
LULU vs GPS Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GPS's competition here
LULU vs GAP Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while GAP trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GAP's competition here
LULU vs URBN Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while URBN trades at $72.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check URBN's competition here
LULU vs VSCO Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while VSCO trades at $74.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 38.68. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check VSCO's competition here
LULU vs BOOT Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while BOOT trades at $170.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BOOT's competition here
LULU vs ANF Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while ANF trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ANF's competition here
LULU vs AEO Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while AEO trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check AEO's competition here
LULU vs FL Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check FL's competition here
LULU vs BKE Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while BKE trades at $43.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check BKE's competition here
LULU vs CRI Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while CRI trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CRI's competition here
LULU vs HIBB Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check HIBB's competition here
LULU vs CHS Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CHS's competition here
LULU vs GES Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GES's competition here
LULU vs SFIX Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while SFIX trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check SFIX's competition here
LULU vs SCVL Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 468.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while SCVL trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check SCVL's competition here
LULU vs DBI Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 443.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while DBI trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -51.47. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DBI's competition here
LULU vs GCO Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 434.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while GCO trades at $38.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check GCO's competition here
LULU vs ZUMZ Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while ZUMZ trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check ZUMZ's competition here
LULU vs CTRN Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while CTRN trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CTRN's competition here
LULU vs JILL Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while JILL trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check JILL's competition here
LULU vs CURV Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while CURV trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CURV's competition here
LULU vs TLYS Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while TLYS trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check TLYS's competition here
LULU vs DLTH Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while DLTH trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DLTH's competition here
LULU vs PLCE Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while PLCE trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check PLCE's competition here
LULU vs CATO Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while CATO trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -336.00. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CATO's competition here
LULU vs DXLG Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while DXLG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DXLG's competition here
LULU vs DBGIW Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DBGIW's competition here
LULU vs LVLU Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while LVLU trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check LVLU's competition here
LULU vs RENT Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while RENT trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check RENT's competition here
LULU vs DBGI Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while DBGI trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check DBGI's competition here
LULU vs EXPR Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check EXPR's competition here
LULU vs JEM Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while JEM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check JEM's competition here
LULU vs COX Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check COX's competition here
LULU vs LDG Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check LDG's competition here
LULU vs CLE Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check CLE's competition here
LULU vs TSA Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check TSA's competition here
LULU vs FINL Comparison June 2026
LULU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LULU stands at 15.1B. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LULU is priced at $126.03, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LULU currently has a P/E ratio of 9.51, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LULU's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.Check FINL's competition here