The Cato Corporation (CATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATO | $3.09 | -1.59% | 55.9M | -311.99 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TJX | $153.69 | +0.62% | 170.1B | 29.90 | $5.14 | +1.14% |
| ROST | $223.82 | -0.11% | 72.4B | 31.21 | $7.17 | +0.74% |
| BURL | $321.07 | +2.25% | 20.2B | 33.06 | $9.71 | N/A |
| LULU | $126.47 | -4.25% | 15.1B | 9.54 | $13.26 | N/A |
| ONON | $38.32 | -3.31% | 13.3B | 40.34 | $0.95 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $21.31 | +1.67% | 7.8B | 10.01 | $2.13 | +3.12% |
| URBN | $72.26 | +1.03% | 6.5B | 13.90 | $5.20 | N/A |
| BOOT | $171.89 | +1.21% | 5.2B | 23.35 | $7.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CATO vs TJX Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 170.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while TJX trades at $153.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TJX's competition here
CATO vs ROST Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while ROST trades at $223.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ROST's competition here
CATO vs BURL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while BURL trades at $321.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BURL's competition here
CATO vs LULU Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while LULU trades at $126.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LULU's competition here
CATO vs ONON Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while ONON trades at $38.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ONON's competition here
CATO vs GPS Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GPS's competition here
CATO vs GAP Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while GAP trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GAP's competition here
CATO vs URBN Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while URBN trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check URBN's competition here
CATO vs BOOT Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while BOOT trades at $171.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BOOT's competition here
CATO vs VSCO Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while VSCO trades at $54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check VSCO's competition here
CATO vs ANF Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while ANF trades at $76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ANF's competition here
CATO vs AEO Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while AEO trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check AEO's competition here
CATO vs FL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FL's competition here
CATO vs BKE Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while BKE trades at $44.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BKE's competition here
CATO vs CRI Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while CRI trades at $39.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CRI's competition here
CATO vs HIBB Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check HIBB's competition here
CATO vs CHS Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CHS's competition here
CATO vs GES Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GES's competition here
CATO vs SFIX Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 480.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while SFIX trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -18.53. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SFIX's competition here
CATO vs SCVL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while SCVL trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SCVL's competition here
CATO vs DBI Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while DBI trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -50.65. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBI's competition here
CATO vs GCO Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 429M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while GCO trades at $39.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GCO's competition here
CATO vs ZUMZ Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while ZUMZ trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ZUMZ's competition here
CATO vs CTRN Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 385.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while CTRN trades at $46.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 73.19. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CTRN's competition here
CATO vs CURV Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while CURV trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CURV's competition here
CATO vs JILL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 151.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while JILL trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JILL's competition here
CATO vs TLYS Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 133.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while TLYS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TLYS's competition here
CATO vs DLTH Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while DLTH trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DLTH's competition here
CATO vs PLCE Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while PLCE trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check PLCE's competition here
CATO vs DXLG Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while DXLG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DXLG's competition here
CATO vs DBGIW Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGIW's competition here
CATO vs LVLU Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while LVLU trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LVLU's competition here
CATO vs RENT Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while RENT trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check RENT's competition here
CATO vs DBGI Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while DBGI trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGI's competition here
CATO vs EXPR Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check EXPR's competition here
CATO vs JEM Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while JEM trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JEM's competition here
CATO vs TSA Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TSA's competition here
CATO vs COX Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check COX's competition here
CATO vs CLE Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CLE's competition here
CATO vs FINL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FINL's competition here
CATO vs LDG Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 55.9M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.09, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -311.99, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LDG's competition here