Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BOOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOOT | $168.61 | -1.91% | 5.2B | 23.20 | $7.36 | N/A |
| TJX | $158.72 | +3.27% | 174.5B | 30.78 | $5.13 | +1.11% |
| ROST | $232.00 | +3.65% | 75.2B | 32.43 | $7.17 | +0.72% |
| BURL | $321.58 | +0.16% | 20.8B | 34.04 | $9.73 | N/A |
| LULU | $125.38 | -0.86% | 15.1B | 9.51 | $13.25 | N/A |
| ONON | $37.20 | -2.94% | 13.1B | 39.10 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $21.30 | -0.05% | 7.6B | 8.41 | $2.52 | +3.16% |
| URBN | $73.08 | +1.13% | 6.5B | 13.96 | $5.20 | N/A |
| VSCO | $77.57 | -3.11% | 5.9B | 38.68 | $1.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BOOT vs TJX Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while TJX trades at $158.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check TJX's competition here
BOOT vs ROST Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while ROST trades at $232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ROST's competition here
BOOT vs BURL Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while BURL trades at $321.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check BURL's competition here
BOOT vs LULU Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while LULU trades at $125.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check LULU's competition here
BOOT vs ONON Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while ONON trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ONON's competition here
BOOT vs GPS Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GPS's competition here
BOOT vs GAP Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while GAP trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GAP's competition here
BOOT vs URBN Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while URBN trades at $73.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check URBN's competition here
BOOT vs VSCO Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while VSCO trades at $77.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 38.68. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check VSCO's competition here
BOOT vs ANF Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while ANF trades at $76.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ANF's competition here
BOOT vs AEO Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while AEO trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check AEO's competition here
BOOT vs FL Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check FL's competition here
BOOT vs BKE Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while BKE trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check BKE's competition here
BOOT vs CRI Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while CRI trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CRI's competition here
BOOT vs HIBB Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check HIBB's competition here
BOOT vs CHS Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CHS's competition here
BOOT vs GES Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GES's competition here
BOOT vs SFIX Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while SFIX trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check SFIX's competition here
BOOT vs SCVL Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 468.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while SCVL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check SCVL's competition here
BOOT vs DBI Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 443.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while DBI trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -51.47. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DBI's competition here
BOOT vs GCO Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 434.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while GCO trades at $39.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check GCO's competition here
BOOT vs ZUMZ Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while ZUMZ trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check ZUMZ's competition here
BOOT vs CTRN Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while CTRN trades at $47.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CTRN's competition here
BOOT vs JILL Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while JILL trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check JILL's competition here
BOOT vs CURV Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while CURV trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CURV's competition here
BOOT vs TLYS Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while TLYS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check TLYS's competition here
BOOT vs DLTH Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while DLTH trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DLTH's competition here
BOOT vs PLCE Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while PLCE trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check PLCE's competition here
BOOT vs CATO Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while CATO trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -336.00. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CATO's competition here
BOOT vs DXLG Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while DXLG trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DXLG's competition here
BOOT vs DBGIW Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DBGIW's competition here
BOOT vs LVLU Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while LVLU trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check LVLU's competition here
BOOT vs RENT Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while RENT trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check RENT's competition here
BOOT vs DBGI Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while DBGI trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check DBGI's competition here
BOOT vs EXPR Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check EXPR's competition here
BOOT vs JEM Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while JEM trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check JEM's competition here
BOOT vs COX Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check COX's competition here
BOOT vs LDG Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check LDG's competition here
BOOT vs CLE Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check CLE's competition here
BOOT vs TSA Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check TSA's competition here
BOOT vs FINL Comparison June 2026
BOOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BOOT stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BOOT is priced at $168.61, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BOOT currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BOOT's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BOOT is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BOOT.Check FINL's competition here