International Paper Company (IP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | $33.47 | +0.45% | 17.7B | -6.45 | -$5.19 | +5.50% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $41.15 | +0.32% | 21.6B | 57.14 | $0.72 | +4.29% |
| PKG | $218.91 | +0.35% | 19.5B | 26.64 | $8.22 | +2.29% |
| AMCR | $38.82 | -1.10% | 18B | 31.06 | $1.25 | +6.61% |
| BALL | $54.67 | -2.79% | 14.6B | 15.94 | $3.43 | +1.45% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $159.07 | -1.31% | 12.2B | 17.92 | $8.88 | +2.35% |
| CCK | $95.08 | -2.46% | 10.6B | 15.12 | $6.29 | +1.27% |
| BERY | $67.58 | +3.97% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IP vs BLL Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BLL's competition here
IP vs SW Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while SW trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SW's competition here
IP vs PKG Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while PKG trades at $218.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PKG's competition here
IP vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while AMCR trades at $38.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AMCR's competition here
IP vs BALL Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while BALL trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BALL's competition here
IP vs WRK Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check WRK's competition here
IP vs AVY Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while AVY trades at $159.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AVY's competition here
IP vs CCK Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while CCK trades at $95.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check CCK's competition here
IP vs BERY Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BERY's competition here
IP vs SEE Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SEE's competition here
IP vs SON Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while SON trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SON's competition here
IP vs REYN Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while REYN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check REYN's competition here
IP vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while SLGN trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SLGN's competition here
IP vs GPK Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while GPK trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GPK's competition here
IP vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PTVE's competition here
IP vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while GEF-B trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GEF-B's competition here
IP vs GEF Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while GEF trades at $63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GEF's competition here
IP vs AMBP Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while AMBP trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -402.50. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AMBP's competition here
IP vs TRS Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while TRS trades at $40.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 116.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TRS's competition here
IP vs OI Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while OI trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check OI's competition here
IP vs MYE Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 857.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while MYE trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check MYE's competition here
IP vs FFHL Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check FFHL's competition here
IP vs PACK Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 589.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while PACK trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PACK's competition here
IP vs KRT Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 541.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while KRT trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check KRT's competition here
IP vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check OCTO's competition here
IP vs TUP Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TUP's competition here
IP vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while MGIH trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check MGIH's competition here
IP vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while YHGJ trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check YHGJ's competition here
IP vs DSS Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while DSS trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check DSS's competition here
IP vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TYDE's competition here
IP vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IP has daily volatility of 3.49 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
IP vs ARD Comparison June 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 17.7B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $33.47, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.45, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check ARD's competition here