Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMBP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBP | $3.94 | -1.13% | 2.4B | -397.50 | -$0.01 | +10.11% |
| SW | $41.47 | -1.56% | 22.2B | 58.75 | $0.72 | +4.18% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| PKG | $223.13 | -0.56% | 20B | 27.34 | $8.22 | +2.23% |
| IP | $33.65 | +0.73% | 17.9B | -6.53 | -$5.19 | +5.49% |
| AMCR | $37.76 | -0.33% | 17.4B | 30.35 | $1.24 | +6.88% |
| BALL | $52.91 | +0.14% | 14B | 15.36 | $3.43 | +1.52% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $154.32 | -1.01% | 11.7B | 17.28 | $8.87 | +2.50% |
| CCK | $93.07 | -1.52% | 10.4B | 14.79 | $6.29 | +1.31% |
Stock Comparison
AMBP vs SW Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while SW trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SW's competition here
AMBP vs BLL Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BLL's competition here
AMBP vs PKG Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while PKG trades at $223.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PKG's competition here
AMBP vs IP Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while IP trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check IP's competition here
AMBP vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while AMCR trades at $37.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check AMCR's competition here
AMBP vs BALL Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while BALL trades at $52.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BALL's competition here
AMBP vs WRK Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check WRK's competition here
AMBP vs AVY Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while AVY trades at $154.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check AVY's competition here
AMBP vs CCK Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while CCK trades at $93.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check CCK's competition here
AMBP vs BERY Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BERY's competition here
AMBP vs SEE Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SEE's competition here
AMBP vs SON Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while SON trades at $47.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SON's competition here
AMBP vs REYN Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while REYN trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check REYN's competition here
AMBP vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while SLGN trades at $36.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SLGN's competition here
AMBP vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PTVE's competition here
AMBP vs GPK Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while GPK trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GPK's competition here
AMBP vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while GEF-B trades at $79.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GEF-B's competition here
AMBP vs GEF Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while GEF trades at $63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GEF's competition here
AMBP vs TRS Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while TRS trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 113.00. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TRS's competition here
AMBP vs OI Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while OI trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check OI's competition here
AMBP vs MYE Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 893.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while MYE trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check MYE's competition here
AMBP vs FFHL Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check FFHL's competition here
AMBP vs PACK Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 588.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while PACK trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PACK's competition here
AMBP vs KRT Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 561.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while KRT trades at $28.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check KRT's competition here
AMBP vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check OCTO's competition here
AMBP vs TUP Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TUP's competition here
AMBP vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while MGIH trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check MGIH's competition here
AMBP vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while YHGJ trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check YHGJ's competition here
AMBP vs DSS Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while DSS trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check DSS's competition here
AMBP vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TYDE's competition here
AMBP vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. AMBP has daily volatility of 2.77 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
AMBP vs ARD Comparison June 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $3.94, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -397.50, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check ARD's competition here