Sonoco Products Company (SON) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SON | $47.49 | -0.73% | 4.7B | 7.77 | $6.11 | +4.50% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $41.28 | -2.37% | 21.7B | 57.35 | $0.72 | +4.27% |
| PKG | $222.82 | -0.83% | 19.9B | 27.11 | $8.22 | +2.25% |
| IP | $33.61 | -0.80% | 17.8B | -6.48 | -$5.19 | +5.54% |
| AMCR | $38.13 | +1.30% | 17.6B | 30.75 | $1.24 | +6.83% |
| BALL | $52.92 | +0.42% | 14.1B | 15.43 | $3.43 | +1.52% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $155.18 | +1.26% | 11.9B | 17.49 | $8.87 | +2.47% |
| CCK | $93.38 | +0.34% | 10.4B | 14.85 | $6.29 | +1.31% |
Stock Comparison
SON vs BLL Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BLL's competition here
SON vs SW Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while SW trades at $41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 57.35. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SW's competition here
SON vs PKG Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while PKG trades at $222.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PKG's competition here
SON vs IP Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while IP trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check IP's competition here
SON vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while AMCR trades at $38.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AMCR's competition here
SON vs BALL Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while BALL trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BALL's competition here
SON vs WRK Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check WRK's competition here
SON vs AVY Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while AVY trades at $155.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AVY's competition here
SON vs CCK Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while CCK trades at $93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check CCK's competition here
SON vs BERY Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BERY's competition here
SON vs SEE Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SEE's competition here
SON vs REYN Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while REYN trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check REYN's competition here
SON vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while SLGN trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SLGN's competition here
SON vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PTVE's competition here
SON vs GPK Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while GPK trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GPK's competition here
SON vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while GEF-B trades at $79.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GEF-B's competition here
SON vs GEF Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while GEF trades at $63.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GEF's competition here
SON vs AMBP Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while AMBP trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -394.00. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AMBP's competition here
SON vs TRS Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while TRS trades at $39.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 111.91. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TRS's competition here
SON vs OI Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while OI trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check OI's competition here
SON vs MYE Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 891M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while MYE trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check MYE's competition here
SON vs FFHL Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check FFHL's competition here
SON vs PACK Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while PACK trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PACK's competition here
SON vs KRT Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 568M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while KRT trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check KRT's competition here
SON vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check OCTO's competition here
SON vs TUP Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TUP's competition here
SON vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while MGIH trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check MGIH's competition here
SON vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while YHGJ trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check YHGJ's competition here
SON vs DSS Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while DSS trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check DSS's competition here
SON vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TYDE's competition here
SON vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SON has daily volatility of 2.35 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
SON vs ARD Comparison June 2026
SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.7B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $47.49, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SON currently has a P/E ratio of 7.77, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check ARD's competition here