Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | $93.35 | -1.22% | 10.4B | 14.79 | $6.29 | +1.31% |
| SW | $41.59 | -1.26% | 22.2B | 58.75 | $0.72 | +4.18% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| PKG | $222.98 | -0.63% | 20B | 27.34 | $8.22 | +2.23% |
| IP | $33.63 | +0.67% | 17.9B | -6.53 | -$5.19 | +5.49% |
| AMCR | $38.02 | +0.37% | 17.4B | 30.35 | $1.24 | +6.88% |
| BALL | $53.05 | +0.42% | 14B | 15.36 | $3.43 | +1.52% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $154.87 | -0.66% | 11.7B | 17.28 | $8.87 | +2.50% |
| BERY | $67.58 | +3.97% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCK vs SW Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while SW trades at $41.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 58.75. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SW's competition here
CCK vs BLL Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check BLL's competition here
CCK vs PKG Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while PKG trades at $222.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check PKG's competition here
CCK vs IP Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while IP trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.53. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check IP's competition here
CCK vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while AMCR trades at $38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check AMCR's competition here
CCK vs BALL Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while BALL trades at $53.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check BALL's competition here
CCK vs WRK Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check WRK's competition here
CCK vs AVY Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while AVY trades at $154.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check AVY's competition here
CCK vs BERY Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check BERY's competition here
CCK vs SEE Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SEE's competition here
CCK vs SON Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while SON trades at $47.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SON's competition here
CCK vs REYN Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while REYN trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check REYN's competition here
CCK vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while SLGN trades at $36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SLGN's competition here
CCK vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check PTVE's competition here
CCK vs GPK Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while GPK trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check GPK's competition here
CCK vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while GEF-B trades at $79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check GEF-B's competition here
CCK vs GEF Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while GEF trades at $63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check GEF's competition here
CCK vs AMBP Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while AMBP trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -397.50. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check AMBP's competition here
CCK vs TRS Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while TRS trades at $39.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 113.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check TRS's competition here
CCK vs OI Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while OI trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check OI's competition here
CCK vs MYE Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 893.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while MYE trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check MYE's competition here
CCK vs FFHL Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check FFHL's competition here
CCK vs PACK Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 588.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while PACK trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check PACK's competition here
CCK vs KRT Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 561.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while KRT trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check KRT's competition here
CCK vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check OCTO's competition here
CCK vs TUP Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check TUP's competition here
CCK vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while MGIH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check MGIH's competition here
CCK vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while YHGJ trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check YHGJ's competition here
CCK vs DSS Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while DSS trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check DSS's competition here
CCK vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check TYDE's competition here
CCK vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CCK has daily volatility of 1.70 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
CCK vs ARD Comparison June 2026
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $93.35, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check ARD's competition here