ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while IBM trades at $225.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check IBM's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while ACN trades at $176.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check ACN's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while INFY trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check INFY's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check FI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CTSH trades at $57.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CTSH's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while FISV trades at $46.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check FISV's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while BR trades at $163.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check BR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while FIS trades at $35.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check FIS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CDW trades at $135.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CDW's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while WIT trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check WIT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while IREN trades at $44.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -30.64. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check IREN's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while LDOS trades at $123.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check LDOS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while GIB trades at $67.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check GIB's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CACI trades at $618.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CACI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while IT trades at $187.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check IT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while WSE trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check WSE's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while JKHY trades at $147.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check JKHY's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while APLD trades at $26.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -27.06. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check APLD's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CIFR trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CIFR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while GDS trades at $32.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check GDS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while INGM trades at $26.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check INGM's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while EPAM trades at $108.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check EPAM's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while G trades at $33.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas G's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to G. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check G's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SAIC trades at $132.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SAIC's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while EXLS trades at $34.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check EXLS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while NSIT trades at $159.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check NSIT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while PSN trades at $43.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check PSN's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check NCR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check WNS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check PRFT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CSQR trades at $17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CSQR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while KD trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check KD's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while KEEL trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check KEEL's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while INOD trades at $69.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 52.43. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check INOD's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SHAZ trades at $54.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SHAZ's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while VNET trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check VNET's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while FORTY trades at $114.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check FORTY's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while DXC trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to DXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check DXC's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CNXC trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CNXC's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while MGRT trades at $121.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 700.00. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check MGRT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while GLOB trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check GLOB's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check TWKS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while EFOR trades at $33.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check EFOR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check BBAI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while BITF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check BITF's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check BTCM's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CLVT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 974.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while VYX trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check VYX's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check ASGN's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SLAI trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SLAI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 864.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while HIVE trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check HIVE's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check MGIC's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CTLP's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 781.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 757.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while WYFI trades at $19.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check WYFI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 754.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while NABL trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check NABL's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 739.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while TASK trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check TASK's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 628.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while GDYN trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check GDYN's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check PHLT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while IBEX trades at $44.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check IBEX's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 492.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while VRRM trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check VRRM's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while TLS trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check TLS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 290.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while ALIT trades at $11.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check ALIT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while TSSI trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check TSSI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check BULLZ's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CNDT trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CNDT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 252.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while HCKT trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check HCKT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SRT's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, LAWR has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while LAWR trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LAWR's P/E ratio is -53.57. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LAWR's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to LAWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check LAWR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CTG's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while UIS trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check UIS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while KORE trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check KORE's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check ALYA's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while DAVA trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check DAVA's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while YB trades at $12.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 2.59. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to YB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to YB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check YB's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CSPI trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -110.14. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CSPI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CHRN trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CHRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CHRN's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while QXL trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to QXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check QXL's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while TTEC trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check TTEC's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CTM trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -47.84. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CTM's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SAIH trades at $30.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SAIH's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while WYY trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -41.73. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check WYY's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SIFYR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while EKSO trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check EKSO's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CLPS trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CLPS's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while JFU trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check JFU's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, DRK has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while DRK trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DRK's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to DRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check DRK's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while CHOW trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check CHOW's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while ALAR trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check ALAR's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while GLE trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to GLE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check GLE's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SGLB's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while LZMH trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check LZMH's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while VEEA trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check VEEA's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while ARBB trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is more volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check ARBB's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while DTST trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check DTST's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while TDTH trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check TDTH's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to SASI's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check SASI's competition here

ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZENA stands at 87.8M. In comparison, DAIC has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZENA is priced at $1.42 on the NASDAQ, while DAIC trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZENA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.88, whereas DAIC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ZENA's ROE is -1.18%, compared to DAIC's ROE of +37.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZENA is less volatile compared to DAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZENA.Check DAIC's competition here